Le corps d'un homme est retrouvé dans un parking de Valence, poignardé à sept reprises. Tout porte à croire qu'il s'agit d'un crime passionnel. Une inspectrice et son équipe entament une enq... Tout lireLe corps d'un homme est retrouvé dans un parking de Valence, poignardé à sept reprises. Tout porte à croire qu'il s'agit d'un crime passionnel. Une inspectrice et son équipe entament une enquête qui les mènera à Maje, la veuve de l'homme.Le corps d'un homme est retrouvé dans un parking de Valence, poignardé à sept reprises. Tout porte à croire qu'il s'agit d'un crime passionnel. Une inspectrice et son équipe entament une enquête qui les mènera à Maje, la veuve de l'homme.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
Àngel Fígols
- Promotor
- (as Ángel Fígols)
Ania Hernández
- Amiga Maje
- (voix)
Avis à la une
I am Spaniard so I have watched this one without subtitles, what is a plus.
So, If you love Spanish series like "El cuerpo en llamas", A window's game is for you. The movie is amazingly real as cruel the case it is.
First, the case is sad and at the same time makes you think about how cruel a woman can be.
Second, cast is superb. Great acting from Tristan Ulloa and Carmen Machi. Ivana Baquero is great too.
Last, the settings and production are superb. Pretty close to reality. Around 95% of the movie happened. Also the scenarios are real too.
So, overall an ugly crime, but a great movie. I mean, if you love true crime, this one is for you.
So, If you love Spanish series like "El cuerpo en llamas", A window's game is for you. The movie is amazingly real as cruel the case it is.
First, the case is sad and at the same time makes you think about how cruel a woman can be.
Second, cast is superb. Great acting from Tristan Ulloa and Carmen Machi. Ivana Baquero is great too.
Last, the settings and production are superb. Pretty close to reality. Around 95% of the movie happened. Also the scenarios are real too.
So, overall an ugly crime, but a great movie. I mean, if you love true crime, this one is for you.
A widows game is based on a true story though like some of these films certain aspects are changed to make it more appealing. We start with maje upset then we go back at certain points to see how we got here with police chief eva trying to work it out. Its clear though maje is up to something and never really cared for her husband salvo ever since they married. Its an interesting watch all the way through but unfortunatly we have been here before with films like this. Predictable is the word but I still liked to see how maniplitive maje was. Acting was good and overall its a decent true crime film.
Portraying a true crime on screen is always a dangerous game: either you build an unsustainable-and perhaps insensitive-mystery, or you opt for a cold, factual retelling that too often feels predictable. A Widow's Game doesn't hide its cards: from the very first move, we know who died (the husband), who survived (the widow), and who most likely wielded the knife. The mystery, therefore, isn't the point. Instead, the film is a sequence of well-worn moves, leaving the viewer to decide whether they want to watch the pieces fall or simply confirm that, yes, everything collapsed exactly as expected.
And collapse it did. The protagonist, Maje-practically a black widow lifted from a rushed femme fatale handbook-parades through the story with subtle ambition and calculated hunger, manipulating men like someone changing outfits. The script occasionally seems interested in exploring her erotic, lethal edge, but it quickly retreats to the safety of factual reconstruction: she cheated, she seduced, she planned, she used. There's no room for deep psychological complexity here, just the linear trajectory of a woman who turned desire and survival into a sharpened weapon. Was there a lack of venom? Perhaps. A lack of the hesitation that humanizes-or corrupts-such characters? Undoubtedly.
The film's structure relies on that classic device of starting with the investigation-led by Eva, a detective as tough as she is sharp-only to shuffle between past and present, back and forth, adding no real layers, just reiterating what we already suspect. The narrative is preoccupied with dissecting who was manipulated, who hid what, who stumbled first. Salva, the manipulated man, is one of those who falls headfirst into the widow's web, convinced he can pull a few strings himself. In the end, of course, he's tangled, suffocated, and-ironically-still believing he can outmaneuver the woman who played him.
This double game-he thinks he's manipulating, but she's always two steps ahead-might be the film's only truly compelling dynamic. Not because it's novel, but because of the morbid pleasure in watching the ruin of a man deluded enough to think he could master someone who plays by her own rules. It's in this clash of wills, this push-and-pull of power, that the film briefly comes alive. And yet, when the house of cards finally collapses, the script seems more interested in documenting the fall than in hinting at its cracks. There's no perverse thrill, no mounting suspense-just the inevitable crash, filmed competently but without fire.
In the end, A Widow's Game is more report than reinvention, more chronicle than tragedy. It's efficient, even good-but it lacks the kind of risk that Maje herself embodies and that the film, ironically, refuses to take. What lingers is this feeling: the game was played, the house fell, the pieces scattered-but for the audience, the match ended long before checkmate.
And collapse it did. The protagonist, Maje-practically a black widow lifted from a rushed femme fatale handbook-parades through the story with subtle ambition and calculated hunger, manipulating men like someone changing outfits. The script occasionally seems interested in exploring her erotic, lethal edge, but it quickly retreats to the safety of factual reconstruction: she cheated, she seduced, she planned, she used. There's no room for deep psychological complexity here, just the linear trajectory of a woman who turned desire and survival into a sharpened weapon. Was there a lack of venom? Perhaps. A lack of the hesitation that humanizes-or corrupts-such characters? Undoubtedly.
The film's structure relies on that classic device of starting with the investigation-led by Eva, a detective as tough as she is sharp-only to shuffle between past and present, back and forth, adding no real layers, just reiterating what we already suspect. The narrative is preoccupied with dissecting who was manipulated, who hid what, who stumbled first. Salva, the manipulated man, is one of those who falls headfirst into the widow's web, convinced he can pull a few strings himself. In the end, of course, he's tangled, suffocated, and-ironically-still believing he can outmaneuver the woman who played him.
This double game-he thinks he's manipulating, but she's always two steps ahead-might be the film's only truly compelling dynamic. Not because it's novel, but because of the morbid pleasure in watching the ruin of a man deluded enough to think he could master someone who plays by her own rules. It's in this clash of wills, this push-and-pull of power, that the film briefly comes alive. And yet, when the house of cards finally collapses, the script seems more interested in documenting the fall than in hinting at its cracks. There's no perverse thrill, no mounting suspense-just the inevitable crash, filmed competently but without fire.
In the end, A Widow's Game is more report than reinvention, more chronicle than tragedy. It's efficient, even good-but it lacks the kind of risk that Maje herself embodies and that the film, ironically, refuses to take. What lingers is this feeling: the game was played, the house fell, the pieces scattered-but for the audience, the match ended long before checkmate.
"A Widow's Game" was a compelling watch. As a true-crime enthusiast, I appreciated its deep dive into a real Spanish murder case I knew nothing about.
The actress playing María (Ivana Baquero) delivered a strong performance, skillfully portraying a manipulative character who exploited men's weaknesses in relationships. The film's overall story about manipulation in love was well-told.
My main critique is the lack of chronological clarity at times, which made following the sequence of events a bit challenging. Also, I would have liked to see real footage or photos of the protagonists at the end, which often enhances true-crime adaptations.
Despite these minor points, it's a worthwhile and thought-provoking film, recommended for fans of true crime and psychological thrillers.
The actress playing María (Ivana Baquero) delivered a strong performance, skillfully portraying a manipulative character who exploited men's weaknesses in relationships. The film's overall story about manipulation in love was well-told.
My main critique is the lack of chronological clarity at times, which made following the sequence of events a bit challenging. Also, I would have liked to see real footage or photos of the protagonists at the end, which often enhances true-crime adaptations.
Despite these minor points, it's a worthwhile and thought-provoking film, recommended for fans of true crime and psychological thrillers.
This film is based on a true event, and honestly, nothing about it is surprising. Everything is highly predictable. Maybe I'm old, but I found it ridiculous-despite the involvement of some genuinely good actors. The story itself is just plain stupid. It's hard to believe that people in the real world, even in 2017, could think they could get away with such a crime. I simply cannot comprehend how this was even possible. It's truly frustrating to know that this actually happened. As for the movie itself, it's not great-there's nothing particularly fascinating or memorable about it.
I can't really tell why it has been on my Netflix recommendations. But, I did watch it. It's a great start, and at the end I was expecting a twist because everything was highly predictable. You need to be 12 years old to find it surprising. Good actors, so-so writing. And there was no reason to have a nudity and that too in the middle of the story. What for ?
I can't really tell why it has been on my Netflix recommendations. But, I did watch it. It's a great start, and at the end I was expecting a twist because everything was highly predictable. You need to be 12 years old to find it surprising. Good actors, so-so writing. And there was no reason to have a nudity and that too in the middle of the story. What for ?
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThe story is based on the real murder of Antonio Navarro Cerdán that occurred on 16 August 2017.
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
Détails
- Durée2 heures 2 minutes
- Couleur
- Mixage
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant