IMDb रेटिंग
6.4/10
3.6 हज़ार
आपकी रेटिंग
तीन असंबद्ध लोग धीरे-धीरे अनुभव करते हैं कि वे एक ही स्वप्न के अलग-अलग हिस्से सपने में देख रहे हैं।तीन असंबद्ध लोग धीरे-धीरे अनुभव करते हैं कि वे एक ही स्वप्न के अलग-अलग हिस्से सपने में देख रहे हैं।तीन असंबद्ध लोग धीरे-धीरे अनुभव करते हैं कि वे एक ही स्वप्न के अलग-अलग हिस्से सपने में देख रहे हैं।
- पुरस्कार
- 3 कुल नामांकन
एपिसोड ब्राउज़ करें
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
So I am watching season 1 am now on episode 5 and to be honest I am no wiser on what is going on than I was 4 episodes ago? I neither understand connections in reality to the main characters or that in dreams and sometimes I am at a loss as to which is dream v reality?
In a previous review sombody compared this show to Sense8 and advised the viewer to watch that instead. Not sure I agree on the comparison however I totally agree that it is a far superior show and addictive sadly cut short of its full potential by the networks non renewing.
Being a masocist I will most likely continue watching this show in the hope that at some stage the story will fall into some coherence at which point I would most probably rewatch it to realise what I missed from the beginning and add things together. Unless it never happens then I will be angry at the wasted time I spent on such trash. At the moment it's heading in that direction sadly.,
Ok I am now on season 2 after prevailing and I have been able to know understand mostly the story which has improved my viewing experience a lot hence I have increased my rating to a 7 if the first season had been more explicit in script/storyline I would have given a 8 so prevail it Defo got better and more enjoyable
OMG how annoying to prevail through 2 seasons and they cancel the show before any answers or conclusions are revealed!! I have just watched the last episode of season 2 left on a pretty large cliffhanger and now I feel robbed would have been better if they had cancelled it after season 1 than allow another season! DAM NETWORKS!
In a previous review sombody compared this show to Sense8 and advised the viewer to watch that instead. Not sure I agree on the comparison however I totally agree that it is a far superior show and addictive sadly cut short of its full potential by the networks non renewing.
Being a masocist I will most likely continue watching this show in the hope that at some stage the story will fall into some coherence at which point I would most probably rewatch it to realise what I missed from the beginning and add things together. Unless it never happens then I will be angry at the wasted time I spent on such trash. At the moment it's heading in that direction sadly.,
Ok I am now on season 2 after prevailing and I have been able to know understand mostly the story which has improved my viewing experience a lot hence I have increased my rating to a 7 if the first season had been more explicit in script/storyline I would have given a 8 so prevail it Defo got better and more enjoyable
OMG how annoying to prevail through 2 seasons and they cancel the show before any answers or conclusions are revealed!! I have just watched the last episode of season 2 left on a pretty large cliffhanger and now I feel robbed would have been better if they had cancelled it after season 1 than allow another season! DAM NETWORKS!
I'd be interested in to know the backstory on why the critics have taken such a negative view of this series right off the bat. The Rotten Tomatoes consensus (dating from the very first episode) is "Falling Water attempts complexity and intrigue but churns out an unimaginative concept lacking a redeemable payoff."
The fact is the concept is highly original--I have spent my life reading and viewing science-fiction and have never come across this theme before. And how can they possibly know that it is "lacking a redeemable payoff"?
Is it possible that these reviewers receive a whole series plot development along with the copy of the first episode? I mean, if they know how the series develops and,for that reason, they know it is a dud, this should be acknowledged up-front somewhere.
The fact is the concept is highly original--I have spent my life reading and viewing science-fiction and have never come across this theme before. And how can they possibly know that it is "lacking a redeemable payoff"?
Is it possible that these reviewers receive a whole series plot development along with the copy of the first episode? I mean, if they know how the series develops and,for that reason, they know it is a dud, this should be acknowledged up-front somewhere.
Watched the first 6 episodes now, and i absolutely love it.
It is not the standard kind of series, it is unique in the way that it tells the story. You have to make some effort to follow, especially during the first episode you need to accustom. But that is why I love it: not just another one of the many TV-shows around, it is not straight to the point and all predictable. It is dreamy, mysterious and bewildering. Sometimes you even don't know for sure whether the characters are awake or dreaming.
A must see I think, at least if you are capable of absorbing a different style of TV- making :)
It is not the standard kind of series, it is unique in the way that it tells the story. You have to make some effort to follow, especially during the first episode you need to accustom. But that is why I love it: not just another one of the many TV-shows around, it is not straight to the point and all predictable. It is dreamy, mysterious and bewildering. Sometimes you even don't know for sure whether the characters are awake or dreaming.
A must see I think, at least if you are capable of absorbing a different style of TV- making :)
10ssimon55
The show is about 3 strangers who are all subconsciously connected through their dreams. The characters are a mother who is looking for her lost child, whom she is told by the hospital doesn't exist, a man looking for his missing girlfriend & a detective trying to cure his catatonic mother.
The directing is great, it plays out like a movie. Fortuately it does not resemble Inception, except for the fact the the theme revolves around dreams & the subconscious. The acting is also good too, especially by one of the leads, Lizzy Brochere who plays Tess.
This seems like one of those shows that will be a long mini-series, or play out like an extended movie, because it's difficult to see how the plot can carry out more than 1 or 2 seasons without the mysteries being resolved. It's a unique plot and very entertaining to watch. The pilot already had a few twists!
The directing is great, it plays out like a movie. Fortuately it does not resemble Inception, except for the fact the the theme revolves around dreams & the subconscious. The acting is also good too, especially by one of the leads, Lizzy Brochere who plays Tess.
This seems like one of those shows that will be a long mini-series, or play out like an extended movie, because it's difficult to see how the plot can carry out more than 1 or 2 seasons without the mysteries being resolved. It's a unique plot and very entertaining to watch. The pilot already had a few twists!
So I've never written a review before so bare with me.
Falling Water's preview was intriguing. Dreams, the sub-conscious mind, connecting on another level along with the required dose of mystery and the hint of coming answers. It looked to have all of the necessary ingredients for a tasty, high intellect sci-fi drama soufflé.
So, my highly intellectual, overly dramatic sci-fi loving mind insisted that I take a bite.
Bittersweet.Or rather "sweetbitter". It swirled around in my head like a slightly old chunk of dark chocolate would on my tongue, but in reverse.
For what little you get from the first episode the idea is very sweet having most of the qualities a TV series of this genre should.
But then you get the bitter.
The writing is harsh to say the least. Cliché, dis-jointed and seemingly lacking much direction. It just didn't flow very well and that took a toll on the episode as a whole.
I'll watch a few more episodes with the hopes that this was noticed by whoever is in charge of the writing and can somehow remedy the cheesiness. Maybe have the writers watch a few old Chris Carter X-Files episodes to get a "taste" of some excellent episode writing.
So, to summarize, you should take a bite of this treat but expect the bitter taste of sub-standard writing along with the sweet aroma that the premise creates.
Bon Appetit. ;)
Falling Water's preview was intriguing. Dreams, the sub-conscious mind, connecting on another level along with the required dose of mystery and the hint of coming answers. It looked to have all of the necessary ingredients for a tasty, high intellect sci-fi drama soufflé.
So, my highly intellectual, overly dramatic sci-fi loving mind insisted that I take a bite.
Bittersweet.Or rather "sweetbitter". It swirled around in my head like a slightly old chunk of dark chocolate would on my tongue, but in reverse.
For what little you get from the first episode the idea is very sweet having most of the qualities a TV series of this genre should.
But then you get the bitter.
The writing is harsh to say the least. Cliché, dis-jointed and seemingly lacking much direction. It just didn't flow very well and that took a toll on the episode as a whole.
I'll watch a few more episodes with the hopes that this was noticed by whoever is in charge of the writing and can somehow remedy the cheesiness. Maybe have the writers watch a few old Chris Carter X-Files episodes to get a "taste" of some excellent episode writing.
So, to summarize, you should take a bite of this treat but expect the bitter taste of sub-standard writing along with the sweet aroma that the premise creates.
Bon Appetit. ;)
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाKumiko's art work was all created by production designed Scott Murphy, who used the work of Lee Bontecou for inspiration.
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
- How many seasons does Falling Water have?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
विवरण
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें