अपनी भाषा में प्लॉट जोड़ेंA bride-to-be becomes suspicious of her fiancee's family while planning their wedding at his remote countryside estate.A bride-to-be becomes suspicious of her fiancee's family while planning their wedding at his remote countryside estate.A bride-to-be becomes suspicious of her fiancee's family while planning their wedding at his remote countryside estate.
Anna Hutchison
- Deanna
- (as Anna Hutchinson)
Nicholas David King
- Chauffeur
- (as Nick King)
Sarah Cleveland
- Vivica
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
Karl Licht
- Wedding Guest
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
Benjamin Worth Bingham Miller
- Detective
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
Michelle Peter
- Rehersal Dinner and Wedding guest
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
I agree with ALL of the negative comments on here, but I would like to include the set, clothing and the groom to be!!! The set is SO TACKY!!! EVERYTHING is HORRIBLE! ! A tiger rug with the head and everything?!!! Come on! SO 70's! The brides dress?!! The dress is off white and the veil is bright white?!! The dress looks all used and abused like from a thrift store! TACKY! Audrey Landers dress and CLEAR heels?! SO 80's! She needs to go back to the set of Knott's Landing or what ever show she used to be on!!! And hubby to be Karl? He looks EXTREMELY sickly! It was VERY distracting! JUST SAY NO!
A woman is swept off her feet and goes to her boyfriend's family home for the wedding. There she meets her future Mother in law played by the still beautiful Audrey Landers. And her future sister in law who was adopted and very close to her Brother. Something mysterious happened to his previous fiancé who burned to death. The story is promising for this kind of Lifetime thriller. It's not annoying but it's slow in the middle. Still want to see it to the end.
It's so bad it almost makes your eyes bleed. Nonsense storyline, terrible acting. Absolute rubbish.
Borrowing some text from another reviewr.
As soon as the female protagonist reveals her coconut allergy, it is clear that this is going to be used to advance the plot. When her Epipen is found in the rubbish, no one really questions it.{ END }
So many of these thriller plots rely on a victim having A fatal reaction to one allergy or other. Yet the affected person keeps the antidote in their luggage, in their purse even a car. Why not on their person always at hand and less likely to be stolen ?
Am I the only one who finds this strange ?
Commenting on the story. The identity of the killer is telegraphed almost at the beginning of the film. So no surprise by the end
As soon as the female protagonist reveals her coconut allergy, it is clear that this is going to be used to advance the plot. When her Epipen is found in the rubbish, no one really questions it.{ END }
So many of these thriller plots rely on a victim having A fatal reaction to one allergy or other. Yet the affected person keeps the antidote in their luggage, in their purse even a car. Why not on their person always at hand and less likely to be stolen ?
Am I the only one who finds this strange ?
Commenting on the story. The identity of the killer is telegraphed almost at the beginning of the film. So no surprise by the end
So I get that LMN movies are meant to be very dramatic.... But they could have found someone else to play the adopted sister. She sounds like she is reading straight from her script.... Not to mention being super nasally.
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
विवरण
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें