मिशन: इम्पॉसिबल - द फाइनल रेकनिंग
ओरिजिनल टाइटल: Mission: Impossible - The Final Reckoning
लंबे समय से चल रही मिशन इम्पॉसिबल फ्रेंचाइजी में आठवीं प्रविष्टि।लंबे समय से चल रही मिशन इम्पॉसिबल फ्रेंचाइजी में आठवीं प्रविष्टि।लंबे समय से चल रही मिशन इम्पॉसिबल फ्रेंचाइजी में आठवीं प्रविष्टि।
- निर्देशक
- लेखक
- स्टार्स
- पुरस्कार
- 6 जीत और कुल 8 नामांकन
7.2187K
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
सारांश
Reviewers say 'Mission: Impossible - The Final Reckoning' is noteworthy for its spectacular stunts and action sequences, particularly Tom Cruise's death-defying performances in the underwater and airplane scenes. However, many reviewers criticize the film for its pacing, over-reliance on exposition, and lack of a compelling plot. The character development and emotional depth are often seen as lacking, with some reviewers feeling the film prioritizes spectacle over story. Despite these criticisms, the film is generally considered entertaining, with the high-octane action and Cruise's performance being the main draws.
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
Lame
Lamest movie in the series, if not ever! I unfortunately spent money in the theatre to watch this so waste of time as well as money! I don't even want to waste any more words writing this review but unfortunately cannot post this until and unless it contains three hundred words so to sum up... Lamest movie ever!
A great ending?
This movie successfully concluded this 30-year-old franchise. The action was superb but not over-the-top. There are a lot of characters from the past that being brought back naturally, which I feel is a nice touch. It serves their purpose and doesn't feel out of place or forced. However, not all are to my liking - the twist wasn't as impressive as previous movies and the plot felt a bit linear and thin. It's almost 3 hours so I feels like a road trip rather than a roller coaster. Despite this, I enjoyed the ride and it reminded me of what MI is really about: "We live and die in the shadows, for those we hold close, and those we never meet."
"Thank you.. for bringing me back"
It was quite clear this film had lofty ambitions since the previous entry.
And considering what it is, what came before it and the legacy it was meant to conclude.. I was expecting to be wowed! Not bored at the start, anxious for something to happen in the middle, and losing all hope to at least be surprised by the end.
It is almost 3 hours long, and the little that does happen, is buried between too much nothing. Awful pacing, dull and meanders dialogue that often goes nowhere nor builds-up to something, a completely dull villain and threat. And worse of all.. what is the point in a movie that constantly tells you exactly how it is going to go? And by virtue of being what it is, there is absolutely no mystery about its conclusion. Not playing with a viewer's expectation is NOT a requirement in storytelling.. but you have to give them something! A bit of tension and intrigue.
It's a shame because I can see what it wanted to achieve with its premise, but it feels stuck in the past while trying to use more modern tropes.
Still, it is entertaining enough, and provides spectacle-scenes so incredible anyone would be hard pressed to replicate them in such quality. The cast is okay, the locations good, great production, visuals and cinematography.
But a film has to be more than a few set pieces and scenes.. it has to work as a whole and be more than the sum of its parts.
It's a fact that not all previous entries have been stellar. So I'm somewhat sad this is how M. I. "ends".
And considering what it is, what came before it and the legacy it was meant to conclude.. I was expecting to be wowed! Not bored at the start, anxious for something to happen in the middle, and losing all hope to at least be surprised by the end.
It is almost 3 hours long, and the little that does happen, is buried between too much nothing. Awful pacing, dull and meanders dialogue that often goes nowhere nor builds-up to something, a completely dull villain and threat. And worse of all.. what is the point in a movie that constantly tells you exactly how it is going to go? And by virtue of being what it is, there is absolutely no mystery about its conclusion. Not playing with a viewer's expectation is NOT a requirement in storytelling.. but you have to give them something! A bit of tension and intrigue.
It's a shame because I can see what it wanted to achieve with its premise, but it feels stuck in the past while trying to use more modern tropes.
Still, it is entertaining enough, and provides spectacle-scenes so incredible anyone would be hard pressed to replicate them in such quality. The cast is okay, the locations good, great production, visuals and cinematography.
But a film has to be more than a few set pieces and scenes.. it has to work as a whole and be more than the sum of its parts.
It's a fact that not all previous entries have been stellar. So I'm somewhat sad this is how M. I. "ends".
Big Stunts, bloated script - An uneven farewell
The Good:
There are two standout action set pieces here-masterfully shot, expertly choreographed, and absolutely worth the price of admission on their own. When Mission: Impossible leans into what it does best-practical stunts and high-octane tension-it soars. Tom Cruise once again gives it everything, backed by a stacked A-list cast that brings gravitas and charm to the chaos.
The Bad: Unfortunately, the film struggles under the weight of its own ambition. It's long, bloated, and paced like a slog. The exposition dumps are painful-overwritten, unnecessarily complex, and made worse by clunky dialogue that bounces awkwardly between multiple characters and locations mid-scene. It kills momentum and disengages the viewer. The villain is a caricature with little dramatic weight, and despite the runtime, there are surprisingly few action sequences compared to earlier entries. Instead, we get manufactured drama and overwrought tension that never really pays off.
The Verdict: This is still an entertaining ride, but one unlikely to earn many repeat viewings. Ghost Protocol, Rogue Nation, and Fallout remain the high watermark of the series. While Final Reckoning lands a jaw-dropping finale, the first half is too bogged down to call this a great send-off. A fitting end to an epic run-just not the ending it deserved.
The Bad: Unfortunately, the film struggles under the weight of its own ambition. It's long, bloated, and paced like a slog. The exposition dumps are painful-overwritten, unnecessarily complex, and made worse by clunky dialogue that bounces awkwardly between multiple characters and locations mid-scene. It kills momentum and disengages the viewer. The villain is a caricature with little dramatic weight, and despite the runtime, there are surprisingly few action sequences compared to earlier entries. Instead, we get manufactured drama and overwrought tension that never really pays off.
The Verdict: This is still an entertaining ride, but one unlikely to earn many repeat viewings. Ghost Protocol, Rogue Nation, and Fallout remain the high watermark of the series. While Final Reckoning lands a jaw-dropping finale, the first half is too bogged down to call this a great send-off. A fitting end to an epic run-just not the ending it deserved.
What happened?
Quite a mixed bag.
Amazing stunt work but the first half of the movie really tests your patience before getting there.
The formula and sexy intro from 3,4,5,6 and even 7 is not here.
I get the impression they were disappointed with the box office from 7, saw Oppenheimer's success and hastingly tried to restructure what they had already filmed for 8 into a bizarre Mission Impossible - Oppenheimer mixture with a very Nolan-esque talking in riddles first half.
That's exactly what this is. And for me it does not work.
Bringing back ground characters back from previous MI movies, who cares?! Tying the entity to what we saw in MI3. Why? We already had the setup in Dead Reckoning? Why make it any more complicated?!
None of the epic / surprise set pieces such as the Kremlin bombing in Ghost Protocol are here. It very much needed something in the first 90 minutes, such as a nuke going off. Instead we are just told what the threat is and it goes on and on.
No Masks, no Ethan completely surprisingly outsmarting the bad guy. It needed something epic, which I was expecting (Ethan had to outsmart the Entity and be a step ahead according to Luther!) For example Elsa could have surprisingly made it and just faked her death or so (in the party club scene in DR we saw Gabriel knives - I thought Ethan may have swapped them for dummy ones or so, the tools were there to do this).
I'm not sure what they were thinking with this one.
A real shame. Too much talk and hardly any fun.
Worth seeing for the action.
But stick to 4,5,6 and 7 for the best of the Mission movies. Those are funny, action packed and have much more heart.
Amazing stunt work but the first half of the movie really tests your patience before getting there.
The formula and sexy intro from 3,4,5,6 and even 7 is not here.
I get the impression they were disappointed with the box office from 7, saw Oppenheimer's success and hastingly tried to restructure what they had already filmed for 8 into a bizarre Mission Impossible - Oppenheimer mixture with a very Nolan-esque talking in riddles first half.
That's exactly what this is. And for me it does not work.
Bringing back ground characters back from previous MI movies, who cares?! Tying the entity to what we saw in MI3. Why? We already had the setup in Dead Reckoning? Why make it any more complicated?!
None of the epic / surprise set pieces such as the Kremlin bombing in Ghost Protocol are here. It very much needed something in the first 90 minutes, such as a nuke going off. Instead we are just told what the threat is and it goes on and on.
No Masks, no Ethan completely surprisingly outsmarting the bad guy. It needed something epic, which I was expecting (Ethan had to outsmart the Entity and be a step ahead according to Luther!) For example Elsa could have surprisingly made it and just faked her death or so (in the party club scene in DR we saw Gabriel knives - I thought Ethan may have swapped them for dummy ones or so, the tools were there to do this).
I'm not sure what they were thinking with this one.
A real shame. Too much talk and hardly any fun.
Worth seeing for the action.
But stick to 4,5,6 and 7 for the best of the Mission movies. Those are funny, action packed and have much more heart.
Theatrical Releases You Can Stream or Rent
Theatrical Releases You Can Stream or Rent
These big screen releases can now be watched from the comfort of your couch.
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाHayley Atwell was eight and a half months pregnant when she shot a fight scene for the movie.
- गूफ़As the lights go back on around the world, it is simultaneously nighttime in both the eastern and western hemispheres.
- भाव
Luther Stickell: Our lives are not defined by any one action. Our lives are the sum of our choices
- क्रेज़ी क्रेडिट[Netherlands theatrical viewing] Even before the first production/distribution company logos appear on-screen, the movie starts with a personal welcoming word by Tom Cruise himself, briefly mentioning the effort they put in making this movie and wishing the audience a happy viewing.
- कनेक्शनFeatured in The 7PM Project: 16 मई 2025 को प्रसारित एपिसोड (2025)
- साउंडट्रैकMission: Impossible Theme
Written by Lalo Schifrin
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
विवरण
- रिलीज़ की तारीख़
- कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
- आधिकारिक साइटें
- भाषाएं
- इस रूप में भी जाना जाता है
- Mission: Impossible - The Final Reckoning
- फ़िल्माने की जगहें
- उत्पादन कंपनियां
- IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें
बॉक्स ऑफ़िस
- बजट
- $40,00,00,000(अनुमानित)
- US और कनाडा में सकल
- $19,74,13,515
- US और कनाडा में पहले सप्ताह में कुल कमाई
- $6,40,36,428
- 25 मई 2025
- दुनिया भर में सकल
- $59,87,67,057
- चलने की अवधि
- 2 घं 49 मि(169 min)
- रंग
- ध्वनि मिश्रण
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 2.39 : 1
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें




