अपनी भाषा में प्लॉट जोड़ेंInteraction among men of a bombing squadron during the Korean War.Interaction among men of a bombing squadron during the Korean War.Interaction among men of a bombing squadron during the Korean War.
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
Due to adverse weather conditions, a small squadron of bomber pilots and their crews stationed in Okinawa during the Korean War have no choice but to sit in their makeshift barracks while awaiting orders. To that effect, one young, enlisted man named "Buddy Lewis" (Larry Pennell) tries to spend as much time with one of the local women by the name of "Sami" (Marla English), who clearly likes him as well. One particular problem, however, is that an officer he works with named "Captain John Merrill" (John Ireland) also fancies Sammi and thinks nothing of abusing his rank to take advantage of the situation. Another potential situation involves another bomber crew member named "Sergeant Al Trask" (Hugh Beaumont), who is experiencing marital difficulties while stationed overseas, and it's affecting his morale to quite an extent. Now, rather than reveal any more, I will just say that this was an adequate Korean War movie, which started slowly but improved about halfway through. Admittedly, the casting of Marla English as the Japanese love interest wasn't entirely convincing; however, aside from that, this turned out to be an adequate B-movie, and I have rated it accordingly. Average.
I am not the most politically correct person out there, but sometimes you certainly can understand folks being upset at a film. Take "Hell's Horizon", a movie set in the Korean War. The female lead (Marla English) is supposed to be Korean....but she seems about as Korean as a Taco Bell! She's obviously a Caucasian and they made no attempt to get her to look or sound Asian. The same can be said about some of the other 'Koreans'...folks who, in some cases, have painted kin and black wigs! The result of which is just stupid....as well as offensive...but mostly stupid.
So is the movie worth seeing despite all this foolishness? Not especially. The first portion of the film is particularly hard to get past....as the 'soldiers' seemed about as professional as the Three Stooges and it was hard to believe these were America's finest! Terrible writing is the problem with all this. And, sadly, the stupid dialog simply continues until this dopey film reaches the end. The folks who fought in this war deserved better than this drivel.
So is the movie worth seeing despite all this foolishness? Not especially. The first portion of the film is particularly hard to get past....as the 'soldiers' seemed about as professional as the Three Stooges and it was hard to believe these were America's finest! Terrible writing is the problem with all this. And, sadly, the stupid dialog simply continues until this dopey film reaches the end. The folks who fought in this war deserved better than this drivel.
A. flight crew goes on an unescorted bombing run on the bridges over the Yalu River during the Korean War.
It's an interesting cast, with John Ireland, William Schallert, Hugh Beaumont, and Bill Williams in the crew. One of the problems with it is that it fits neatly into the World War Two Flyer Squadrom genre of the period. Change a few lines of dialogue, and convert Marla English from an Okinawan to a Scottish lassie, and you have a decent movie of the previous war. Since most of it is shot on a stage decorated like a bomber's cockpit, it's clearly a very cheap feature, with little to recommend it.
It's an interesting cast, with John Ireland, William Schallert, Hugh Beaumont, and Bill Williams in the crew. One of the problems with it is that it fits neatly into the World War Two Flyer Squadrom genre of the period. Change a few lines of dialogue, and convert Marla English from an Okinawan to a Scottish lassie, and you have a decent movie of the previous war. Since most of it is shot on a stage decorated like a bomber's cockpit, it's clearly a very cheap feature, with little to recommend it.
The Korean War had only one good film in its entirety: The Manchurian Candidate, and 95% of that film has no combat action. The editing in this film borders on the horrendous, as only the characterizations, and the mighty effort of the very talented lead actor save the film.
Another major drawback is using an obviously Caucasian woman and child as Okinawans, when there were plenty of competent Asian actresses and kids who could have easily played those roles.
Other than the editing and casting errors, the film holds up pretty well for the combat sequences, even though they are footage pieces. The romance and Dear John sequences are believable to a lesser degree. The problem with Korean War films is that they are all destined to lose, just like the Vietnam films, but the Vietnam films like Apocalypse Now, and Platoon, as well as Go Tell the Spartans, were all much better produced, as losing can be much more dramatic than winning at times.
Another major drawback is using an obviously Caucasian woman and child as Okinawans, when there were plenty of competent Asian actresses and kids who could have easily played those roles.
Other than the editing and casting errors, the film holds up pretty well for the combat sequences, even though they are footage pieces. The romance and Dear John sequences are believable to a lesser degree. The problem with Korean War films is that they are all destined to lose, just like the Vietnam films, but the Vietnam films like Apocalypse Now, and Platoon, as well as Go Tell the Spartans, were all much better produced, as losing can be much more dramatic than winning at times.
About the best use of stock footage I've seen. Make no mistake, there are ZERO shots of aircraft flying, taking off, even exteriors on the ramp that are shot for this movie, or even models. It's all tent city on a soundstage, interior of a (probably real but scrapped surplus) B29, and stock footage.
But it sorta works. They voice over things like the crew checking out the plane as the stock footage isn't that great resolution, it's mid shots, and one 50s USAF guy in all his gear looks very much like another.
Falls apart a bit in the action scenes where the footage cannot decide what altitude they are at (and it is scripted, sorta matters), the enemy aircraft are several /different/ USAF aircraft, and... oh, they bomb China. That also was briefed, but they forget when picking impact footage.
Well acted, pretty well scripted. Okay photography, and the in-aircraft scenes are awfully well done; the pilot ones are the only with pretty soundstage blocking, others feel very personal. Apparently had a good advisor, everyone does stuff that at least feels very authentic, everything deliberate.
Yes, the Korean love interest is super duper a white chick, and it's not just racist but is distractingly wrong.
Otherwise the worst thing about the film is the editing. It's just indifferent. Many shots too long, some too short and it cuts between unimportant things. The stock footage also falls prey to this; it could have used 90% less of it, and done almost everything from inside the aircraft, not just as a character study but as claustrophobic action. Those were already the best bits.
But it sorta works. They voice over things like the crew checking out the plane as the stock footage isn't that great resolution, it's mid shots, and one 50s USAF guy in all his gear looks very much like another.
Falls apart a bit in the action scenes where the footage cannot decide what altitude they are at (and it is scripted, sorta matters), the enemy aircraft are several /different/ USAF aircraft, and... oh, they bomb China. That also was briefed, but they forget when picking impact footage.
Well acted, pretty well scripted. Okay photography, and the in-aircraft scenes are awfully well done; the pilot ones are the only with pretty soundstage blocking, others feel very personal. Apparently had a good advisor, everyone does stuff that at least feels very authentic, everything deliberate.
Yes, the Korean love interest is super duper a white chick, and it's not just racist but is distractingly wrong.
Otherwise the worst thing about the film is the editing. It's just indifferent. Many shots too long, some too short and it cuts between unimportant things. The stock footage also falls prey to this; it could have used 90% less of it, and done almost everything from inside the aircraft, not just as a character study but as claustrophobic action. Those were already the best bits.
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाThe aircraft used in the film is a B-50, a modified version of the venerable B-29 Superfortress of World War II fame. B-29s were used in the Korean War early on, but by 1952 had been mostly phased out for the somewhat updated B-50 version.
- गूफ़The large aircraft in the background on the movie poster appear to be multiple Boeing B-52 Stratofortresses, which did not enter active service in the U.S. Air Force until 1955, several years after the movie takes place (1952). Also, the mission is specifically assigned as a single plane mission because of the accuracy required in the bombing of the target.
- भाव
Paul Jenkins: You got a Distinguished Flying Cross, let's see you do some distinguished flying.
- कनेक्शनFeatured in Let's Get Lost (1988)
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
विवरण
- चलने की अवधि1 घंटा 20 मिनट
- रंग
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 1.37 : 1
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें