अपनी भाषा में प्लॉट जोड़ेंA family takes a long delayed trip to Europe and finds an unending series of comedy adventures.A family takes a long delayed trip to Europe and finds an unending series of comedy adventures.A family takes a long delayed trip to Europe and finds an unending series of comedy adventures.
- निर्देशक
- लेखक
- स्टार
- 2 ऑस्कर के लिए नामांकित
- 2 कुल नामांकन
Howard Smith
- Judge Henderson
- (as Howard I. Smith)
Max Showalter
- The Tight Suit
- (as Casey Adams)
George Boyce
- Ship Passenger
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
George Bruggeman
- Ship Passenger
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
During the 1955-65 golden era of Disney live action movies targeting baby boomers, there were many hits and only a rare miss; what with huge pre-sold theater audiences who automatically lapped up any Disney comedy that came to their local theaters. There was little risk to studio and to viewer because these things utilized a proven formula and featured a narrow ensemble of likable Disney actors. Interestingly "Bon Voyage!", released in May 1962, was probably the studio's biggest miss.
It is likely I was one of those who paid money that summer to see this film, but if so it made so little of an impression on me that during a recent viewing my normally excellent memory failed to find anything familiar enough convince me that I had seen it 50+ years ago. But assuming that I had seen it and given my sudden and extreme infatuation with Deborah Walley after seeing her one year later in "Summer Magic", "Bon Voyage!" must have been completely erased from my memory within hours of viewing it as I am certain I never connected Walley's Cousin Julia to Amy Willard.
The only virtue of "Bon Voyage!" today is that it evokes a nostalgic reaction of baby boomer family vacations in general and to ocean liner and Paris family vacations in particular. But in the early sixties such a future would not have been a factor in green lighting a production. If you look back on the successful Disney comedies of the era you can easily see the standard formula that was pitched to the studios. Familiar inoffensive actors playing wholesome characters, mild comedy that disparaged no one and was typically at the expense of a harried but well meaning father, and most importantly a hook or gimmick that engaged the audience and made them willing to suspend their disbelief and identify with whichever character targeted their demographic.
Disney first would find a tried and tested hook and then use their stock elements to build a movie around it. "Flubber" was the best of these hooks and worked across several movies, although it was just an unoriginal reprise of "It Happens Every Spring". "Summer Magic" was the application of acute nostalgia to "Mother Carey's Chickens". "Swiss family Robinson", "Babes In Toyland" and "Mary Poppins" were established children's stories given a magical Disney flourish. Apparently something convinced the studio in 1962 that the family European vacation hook was foolproof and the pitch for "Bon Voyage!" got the green light.
Compared to their standard film the concept was original, relatively big budget, and full of location shooting. Making it an odd blend of Disney nature documentary and light comedy. So its crash and burn taught the studio to not be seduced by originally. And also that a inoffensive ensemble of lightweight actors could not save a production doomed by a faulty concept and an extraordinarily weak script.
I suspect that the fundamental failure of the film was in just having too many stories, none of which fostered much viewer identification or otherwise connected with the audience. One of lame bumbling father comedy (Fred MacMurray), one of boringly overwrought romantic melodrama (Walley), and one of gratuitous sleaze (Tommy Kirk). The standard Disney audience was willing to suspend disbelief and even go with a self-knowing whimsy; but only if they strongly identified with one or more of the central characters.
Then again, what do I know? I'm only a child.
It is likely I was one of those who paid money that summer to see this film, but if so it made so little of an impression on me that during a recent viewing my normally excellent memory failed to find anything familiar enough convince me that I had seen it 50+ years ago. But assuming that I had seen it and given my sudden and extreme infatuation with Deborah Walley after seeing her one year later in "Summer Magic", "Bon Voyage!" must have been completely erased from my memory within hours of viewing it as I am certain I never connected Walley's Cousin Julia to Amy Willard.
The only virtue of "Bon Voyage!" today is that it evokes a nostalgic reaction of baby boomer family vacations in general and to ocean liner and Paris family vacations in particular. But in the early sixties such a future would not have been a factor in green lighting a production. If you look back on the successful Disney comedies of the era you can easily see the standard formula that was pitched to the studios. Familiar inoffensive actors playing wholesome characters, mild comedy that disparaged no one and was typically at the expense of a harried but well meaning father, and most importantly a hook or gimmick that engaged the audience and made them willing to suspend their disbelief and identify with whichever character targeted their demographic.
Disney first would find a tried and tested hook and then use their stock elements to build a movie around it. "Flubber" was the best of these hooks and worked across several movies, although it was just an unoriginal reprise of "It Happens Every Spring". "Summer Magic" was the application of acute nostalgia to "Mother Carey's Chickens". "Swiss family Robinson", "Babes In Toyland" and "Mary Poppins" were established children's stories given a magical Disney flourish. Apparently something convinced the studio in 1962 that the family European vacation hook was foolproof and the pitch for "Bon Voyage!" got the green light.
Compared to their standard film the concept was original, relatively big budget, and full of location shooting. Making it an odd blend of Disney nature documentary and light comedy. So its crash and burn taught the studio to not be seduced by originally. And also that a inoffensive ensemble of lightweight actors could not save a production doomed by a faulty concept and an extraordinarily weak script.
I suspect that the fundamental failure of the film was in just having too many stories, none of which fostered much viewer identification or otherwise connected with the audience. One of lame bumbling father comedy (Fred MacMurray), one of boringly overwrought romantic melodrama (Walley), and one of gratuitous sleaze (Tommy Kirk). The standard Disney audience was willing to suspend disbelief and even go with a self-knowing whimsy; but only if they strongly identified with one or more of the central characters.
Then again, what do I know? I'm only a child.
Wow, this movie is boring. I think it's supposed to be a comedy, but I didn't really find it very funny. It's not one thing or another. It's not really terrible, but then it's not really good either. The scenes when they walk around Paris are better than most of the film, for at least you get to see some of the scenery, but that doesn't really make up for the bland, boring movie that this is. I think the concept is okay and they had a real opportunity to make a decent film, but somehow they just couldn't. I don't think it would have been quite so bad if it hadn't been so long. They could have easily have made a decent film by just cutting about an hour of the movie's runtime. It's not offensive or horrible in any way, however, and it wouldn't hurt to have it on in the background.
This Disney Romantic Comedy is just plain too long for its own good. Fred MacMurray and Jane Wyman star as an Indiana couple finally getting their trip to Paris, but with three "kids" in tow. They get involved in all sorts of complications, especially with the older kids.
Amy (Deborah Walley) has met a rich young man (Michael Callan) who is also taking the ocean liner trip. She's a cold fish and he's a neurotic pain. Elliott (Tommy Kirk) is a sullen little thing, but he perks up when he gets to Paris and meets some girls. Then there's little Skipper (Kevin Corcoran) who makes some trouble for Dad.
While this could have been a fun film, it's so slow and draggy, the pacing kills it dead. Wyman and MacMurray have very little chemistry but go through their paces as the pros they were. Wyman is further hampered by those hideous mid-century clothes and hats.
Jessie Royce Landis provides a punch of fun and color as Callan's flamboyant mother. Ivan Desny makes for a dreary masher. A few other familiar faces like James Milllhollin, Howard Smith, Doris Packer, Max Showalter, and Richard Wattis, don't have much to do. Carol White, a British actress famous (later in the 1960s) for gritty British films like POOR COW, is oddly cast as one of Kirk's girl friends.
MacMurray does have a few good comedy scenes, but there's not enough punch to make this more than an extended sitcom. The film won Oscar nominations for sound and the hideous costumes.
Amy (Deborah Walley) has met a rich young man (Michael Callan) who is also taking the ocean liner trip. She's a cold fish and he's a neurotic pain. Elliott (Tommy Kirk) is a sullen little thing, but he perks up when he gets to Paris and meets some girls. Then there's little Skipper (Kevin Corcoran) who makes some trouble for Dad.
While this could have been a fun film, it's so slow and draggy, the pacing kills it dead. Wyman and MacMurray have very little chemistry but go through their paces as the pros they were. Wyman is further hampered by those hideous mid-century clothes and hats.
Jessie Royce Landis provides a punch of fun and color as Callan's flamboyant mother. Ivan Desny makes for a dreary masher. A few other familiar faces like James Milllhollin, Howard Smith, Doris Packer, Max Showalter, and Richard Wattis, don't have much to do. Carol White, a British actress famous (later in the 1960s) for gritty British films like POOR COW, is oddly cast as one of Kirk's girl friends.
MacMurray does have a few good comedy scenes, but there's not enough punch to make this more than an extended sitcom. The film won Oscar nominations for sound and the hideous costumes.
Fred MacMurray, Tommy Kirk, Kevin Corcoran. 3 classic Disney stars that you can't go wrong with. But somehow this just missed. A good concept but just didn't have laughs. Its more about annoying love spats. I've been watching all of the late 50s and into the 60s live action Disney movies. Some of them are awesome. Some of them are good but a little slow and then by the time you get to the end, the music and the story have you captured. Others yet left a little to be desired but are still good family fare. This one, well it just doesn't make the cut. Well, if you are like me and want to watch every Disney live action movie from the time period, its OK, its not that bad, scenes in France will keep you interested.
This turned out to be a good movie. Fred MacMurray and Jane Wyman finally take the European trip they've always dreamed of, including taking their three children along. Tommy Kirk and Doborah Walley are their teen-aged children and bring along their romantic escapades. On location shooting make for a better than average Disney film. Saw this on the Disney channel.
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाThe Disney studio was aware of Tommy Kirk's homosexuality by this time. Kirk did not get along with Jane Wyman during filming, and his relationship with Fred MacMurray deteriorated as well. He recalled, "I thought Jane Wyman was a hard, cold woman and I got to hate her by the time I was through with Bon Voyage!. Of course, she didn't like me either, so I guess it came natural. I think she had some suspicion that I was gay and all I can say is that, if she didn't like me for that, she doesn't like a lot of people."
- गूफ़The SS United States was famously advertised as being totally fireproof, with wood furnishings banned from her construction and decor. In sound stage version of the ship's library, the space is decorated with wooden tables and chairs.
- भाव
[on the beach at Cannes, Harry and Skipper are watching Elliott chat up a pretty French girl, as the girl's mother looks on disapprovingly]
Skipper Willard: How do you like Elliott's new moustache, Dad?
Harry Willard: I think I like the one on the girl's mother better.
- कनेक्शनFeatured in L'ami public numéro un: L'usine à rêves (1962)
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
- How long is Bon Voyage!?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
विवरण
- रिलीज़ की तारीख़
- कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
- आधिकारिक साइट
- भाषा
- इस रूप में भी जाना जाता है
- Champagner in Paris
- फ़िल्माने की जगहें
- उत्पादन कंपनी
- IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें
बॉक्स ऑफ़िस
- US और कनाडा में सकल
- $1,19,90,000
- चलने की अवधि2 घंटे 10 मिनट
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 1.75 : 1
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें