IMDb रेटिंग
2.8/10
63 हज़ार
आपकी रेटिंग
इसमें हँसाने वाले रोमांटिक कॉमेडी हैं, जो एक आदमी (कैंपबेल), उसके क्रश (हनिगन), उसके माता-पिता (कूलिज, विलार्ड) और उसके पिता (ग्रिफिन) पर केंद्रित है।इसमें हँसाने वाले रोमांटिक कॉमेडी हैं, जो एक आदमी (कैंपबेल), उसके क्रश (हनिगन), उसके माता-पिता (कूलिज, विलार्ड) और उसके पिता (ग्रिफिन) पर केंद्रित है।इसमें हँसाने वाले रोमांटिक कॉमेडी हैं, जो एक आदमी (कैंपबेल), उसके क्रश (हनिगन), उसके माता-पिता (कूलिज, विलार्ड) और उसके पिता (ग्रिफिन) पर केंद्रित है।
- पुरस्कार
- 4 जीत और 1 नामांकन
Valery M. Ortiz
- Jell-O
- (as Valery Ortiz)
Charlie Dell
- Justice of the Peace
- (as Charles Dell)
कहानी
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाThis movie was screened for critics before release, which is rare for a Seltzer and Friedberg movie.
- गूफ़When Julia is doing her "Milkshake" dance, she starts dancing to the taxi driver. In a side shot, the camera is reflected in the side of the taxi.
- भाव
Roz Fockyerdoder: [gives Julia the present after the wedding] It's a vaginal thermometer. It's been in our family for generations.
Linda Jones: It lets you know when your ovulating.
Roz Fockyerdoder: And if you wanna keep it a lucky one, don't ever wash it.
- इसके अलावा अन्य वर्जनThe 85-minute extended, unrated version is only about 2 minutes longer and there are some changes:
- In the scene spoofing The Bachelor, the dialogue introducing Grant is different.
- The scene with the cat on the toilet is longer.
- There is some extra dialogue after the wizard gets kicked in the crotch.
- Grant's last name is "Fockyerdoder" instead of "Funkyerdoder".
- Julia shows Jack two extra cards.
- When Nicky is thinking about the honeymoon, the dialogue is different.
- The scene where Roz & Linda are talking is much more explicit.
- Andy's introduction is longer and more suggestive.
- कनेक्शनFeatured in 20 to 1: Adults Only 20 to 01: Sexiest Movie Scenes (2009)
- साउंडट्रैकBridal Chorus
Written by Richard Wagner
Arranged by James Harpham and John Gale
Courtesy of 5 Alarm Music
फीचर्ड रिव्यू
This is probably the most reviewed title among those I really felt like writing about, but still I think it can go with yet another mini-essay on how bad it was.
Being in a mood for something light and hearing "there's something about a funny fat girl on TV" i sat down to watch. For a reason unknown I thought about an original story about a fat girl who finds happiness or something like that. However, the fat girl was replaced with a thin girl, paired with a boy and a collection of unrelated idiotic scenes followed.
The supposed meaning behind these unrelated scenes was a parody of scenes from all well known American date movies. The problem is that date movies are often referred to as "romantic comedies" and you really can't make a comedy being a parody of a comedy. Funny turned into "funnier" results in RETARDED and romantic/erotic element made into "funny" becomes GROSS.
The cross-references to popular date movies are possible to grasp only if you remember a particular scene from this or that comedy. There is no parody of the style or genre, but only situations and gestures are copied from scenes from other movies and put in a different context or more precisely, into non-context. Every scene seems more pointless and less funny than another. Even if you are not a demanding viewer, in a mood for something silly, enjoying toilet humor and soft porn from time to time you may not be able to watch the whole of it. In my opinion to switch it off during a cat's attempt at sexual activity with a dried human corpse is already a few scenes too far. The question remains: when would YOU switch it off?
Being in a mood for something light and hearing "there's something about a funny fat girl on TV" i sat down to watch. For a reason unknown I thought about an original story about a fat girl who finds happiness or something like that. However, the fat girl was replaced with a thin girl, paired with a boy and a collection of unrelated idiotic scenes followed.
The supposed meaning behind these unrelated scenes was a parody of scenes from all well known American date movies. The problem is that date movies are often referred to as "romantic comedies" and you really can't make a comedy being a parody of a comedy. Funny turned into "funnier" results in RETARDED and romantic/erotic element made into "funny" becomes GROSS.
The cross-references to popular date movies are possible to grasp only if you remember a particular scene from this or that comedy. There is no parody of the style or genre, but only situations and gestures are copied from scenes from other movies and put in a different context or more precisely, into non-context. Every scene seems more pointless and less funny than another. Even if you are not a demanding viewer, in a mood for something silly, enjoying toilet humor and soft porn from time to time you may not be able to watch the whole of it. In my opinion to switch it off during a cat's attempt at sexual activity with a dried human corpse is already a few scenes too far. The question remains: when would YOU switch it off?
- thislizard
- 16 अप्रैल 2010
- परमालिंक
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
विवरण
- रिलीज़ की तारीख़
- कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
- भाषा
- इस रूप में भी जाना जाता है
- Untitled Aaron Seltzer/Jason Friedberg Project
- फ़िल्माने की जगहें
- Church of the Angels - 1100 Avenue 64, पासडेना, कैलिफोर्निया, संयुक्त राज्य अमेरिका(Exterior shot - Location for Julia and Grant's wedding)
- उत्पादन कंपनियां
- IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें
बॉक्स ऑफ़िस
- बजट
- $2,00,00,000(अनुमानित)
- US और कनाडा में सकल
- $4,85,48,426
- US और कनाडा में पहले सप्ताह में कुल कमाई
- $1,90,76,261
- 19 फ़र॰ 2006
- दुनिया भर में सकल
- $8,57,49,034
- चलने की अवधि1 घंटा 23 मिनट
- रंग
- ध्वनि मिश्रण
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 1.85 : 1
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें