Some Kind of Justice

Comments about the film have no validity when they are attacking one of the actors for personal beliefs. The comments made about Elizabeth Brinkley are libelous and I hope the site will identify the person to Elizabeth, thereby allowing her to institute a law suit against the individual.

Elizabeth is known for her stance on animal welfare, and she is not an animal rights person. There is a difference!

This site is no place to display one's ignorance and make personal insults instead of giving a critique of the film. Sorry this doesn't, either...but I hope whoever is in charge of this site removes the personal attack against one of the actors in the film.

Films are information for a viewers discretion not for personal attacks on the actors(es). I personally have not seen the movie. I do not watch much TV due to the nudity & profanity that is shown in most films. A personal attack on Elizabeth Brinkley is not only absurd but shows exactly the paranoid mental state this person is in by attacking this woman professionally. The agenda of PeTA & HSUS is to stop ALL EATING, KEEPING, BREEDING & Using of ALL Animals. "Higher Court" and others like him are terrorists who live among us and are destroying our freedom and the world as we known it. His opinions of Elizabeth Brinkley are of personal opinion and is not one of her acting ability. Please delete this mans comments of Elizabeth Brinkley.

The movie was great- I am a big fan of mysteries. And I agree that black and white is usually best (For me at least) when dealing with graphic violence.

But the animal rights twit who wrote a bad review of Elizabeth Brinkley's presence in the film, without mentioning her performance, is typical of the mindset we animal lovers see more and more daily. What does Elizabeth's fight for our right to own pets (PeTA's agenda is to eliminate all animal ownership as soon as possible- read their literature on site) have to do with a great performance in a film? The animal rights drones are ruining every aspect of life for those of us who love our pets and anyone who likes to wear something other than pleather.

This is a movie you need to watch more than once.

It has a very interesting cult-like feeling and a rawness at times that is super real. The acting is uneven at times but in general doesn't really hurt the film's story line. There are also some funny moments between the detectives, the police chef and the profiler.

I liked the fact that the profiler really enjoyed getting into the sicko head of the killer. The use of flash backs can get a bit confusing. You have to remember them to get to the bottom of this complicated story. This is why you may want to watch it more than once. Be aware there is some graphic nudity. Good thing it is in B&W

If you like RAW and feeling like a voyeur in an odd story, you will like this.

I particularly enjoyed the tension between FBI Agent Morgan and Private Investigator Brodski as they are both determined to solve the case before the other, and the total lack of protocol by Morgan (who doesn't get any respect from his subordinates). The relationship between these two could have been developed further in this film. Also enjoyable was the Profiler delving into the psyche of the serial killer. I thought the nudity wasn't overly done and did not detract the quality of this film. Pay attention to flashback scenes. After hearing and reading the news in Harrisburg the last month or so, this story could actually have happened!