IMDb रेटिंग
6.4/10
17 हज़ार
आपकी रेटिंग
परिवार की ताकत और अमेरिकन ड्रीम की पीढ़ीगत खोज के बारे में एक गहरी व्यक्तिगत आने वाली कहानी.परिवार की ताकत और अमेरिकन ड्रीम की पीढ़ीगत खोज के बारे में एक गहरी व्यक्तिगत आने वाली कहानी.परिवार की ताकत और अमेरिकन ड्रीम की पीढ़ीगत खोज के बारे में एक गहरी व्यक्तिगत आने वाली कहानी.
- पुरस्कार
- 3 जीत और कुल 19 नामांकन
Dane Zagarino
- Topper Lowell
- (as Dane West)
Jacob MacKinnon
- Edgar Romanelli
- (as Jacob Mackinnon)
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
I grew up in NYC and went to PS 154 around the same time Banks Repeta's character did, so I can totally relate to the story. That doesn't mean it makes this film better for me. In fact. I kept thinking "so what?". This entire story is a reality that almost everyone has experienced, whatever side of the coin you're on, so it's absolutely nothing revolutionary, and for that matter, it was rather hollow and bland. It was at least 30 mins too long, and the pacing was too slow to maintain engagement with the narrative. It was all basic filler with very little substance. Nevertheless, the young actors delivered convincing performances, as did the A-listers - although we have to expect that from them. I want to say it's a decent one-time watch for a reason I can't find, so I wont. You'll basically see great performances, a great score and soundtrack, excellent cinematography, but no compelling narrative. It's a generous 6/10 from me, only because it brought back memories when I was growing up in that era and neighborhood.
Thia is the only idea that caught my attention in this film.
Being a thirteen or so young boy with a caring full family that loves you, and protects you, this is a privilege.
But no boy at that age is going to realise it despite all the trouble he seems to adore.
I actually hoped the film will focus on the idea of art at that time and originality, but apparently they had other plans.
I think the film discussed and focused at that period of time as a whole and its after effects on the new generation of young boys. Honestly, i didn't feel connected to the boy. I wasn't engaged.
Other than all that, the acting was very good and Sir Anthony Hopkins is always nice to see.
Being a thirteen or so young boy with a caring full family that loves you, and protects you, this is a privilege.
But no boy at that age is going to realise it despite all the trouble he seems to adore.
I actually hoped the film will focus on the idea of art at that time and originality, but apparently they had other plans.
I think the film discussed and focused at that period of time as a whole and its after effects on the new generation of young boys. Honestly, i didn't feel connected to the boy. I wasn't engaged.
Other than all that, the acting was very good and Sir Anthony Hopkins is always nice to see.
James Gray really can write psychologically and morally complex characters better than the vast majority of filmmakers working today. The central family portrayed in his latest film showcases this.
The people in Gray's 1980 New York are all remarkably flawed with objectionable traits and tendencies, yet they have tangible human qualities that make watching them a constantly riveting experience. They struggle to live and love and Gray gives them all little satisfying moments to grow.
As for the performances, they're equally awe-inspiring, especially Anne Hathaway and Anthony Hopkins. But the young boy, Banks Repeta, is also a standout and manages to carry most of the film on his own.
Plot-wise, however, the film is seriously lacking in momentum and substance. There really is no inviting incident nor is there even a real central conflict in the film; just small subplots that begin and sometimes come to an end over the course of the movie.
The lack of tangible pacing and progress makes the story's conclusion feel a bit hollow and empty, but the journey itself is packed with little rewarding moments and powerful scenes that make the overall experience a mostly satisfying one.
The people in Gray's 1980 New York are all remarkably flawed with objectionable traits and tendencies, yet they have tangible human qualities that make watching them a constantly riveting experience. They struggle to live and love and Gray gives them all little satisfying moments to grow.
As for the performances, they're equally awe-inspiring, especially Anne Hathaway and Anthony Hopkins. But the young boy, Banks Repeta, is also a standout and manages to carry most of the film on his own.
Plot-wise, however, the film is seriously lacking in momentum and substance. There really is no inviting incident nor is there even a real central conflict in the film; just small subplots that begin and sometimes come to an end over the course of the movie.
The lack of tangible pacing and progress makes the story's conclusion feel a bit hollow and empty, but the journey itself is packed with little rewarding moments and powerful scenes that make the overall experience a mostly satisfying one.
If director Gray thinks Reagan mentioning Armageddon was traumatic, he ought to talk to those of us who lived through the Cuban Missile Crisis! Other than being scared by the suggestion of nuclear war rather than actually being on the brink of it, this film is lackluster and derivitive. Nothing original and nothing new to say, with pedestrian direction, and an uninspired script. This is a movie that thinks it has a lot to say but it just doesn't have anything interesting to say. It's hard to become invested in such silly, shallow, and self-absorbed characters. An excellent cast does the best they can but it all adds up to very little indeed.
You've seen it many times before, watching other people grow up's such a chore, we've all been adolescent, distracted and pubescent, it's a boring set of takes and you will snore. Perhaps if it had something new to say, portrayed a family more uniquely in their way, a novel circumstance, to catch your eye, a second glance, not monotony of children in their play. If you make it to the end you might just wonder, why fine actors chose to loot your time and plunder, must be quite a fallow year, to want to make this and appear, in something that's so dull, it makes you want to slumber.
Although it also makes you wonder whether an aging Welshman is the only person who could have filled that specific role.
Although it also makes you wonder whether an aging Welshman is the only person who could have filled that specific role.
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाThe film's title is a reference to the song "Armagideon Time" by The Clash, as well as a reference to Ronald Reagan, who James Gray said was "always talking about the armageddon." He said Reagan was, "always mentioning the world ending. It was cultural trauma. That weighed on kids in 1980. In the [Reagan interview] clip you see in the movie, he's actually talking about Armageddon as a result of homosexuality, which is crazy. He's talking about Sodom and Gomorrah."
- गूफ़Paul is sent to Forest Manor School, which is overseen and financed by Frederick Trump. Trump never oversaw or financed a school. He sat on the board of Kew-Forest, which his children Maryanne and Donald attended. That said, this *goof* was likely intentional on the part of the filmmakers.
- भाव
Paul Graff: Sometimes kids at school say bad words about the Black kids.
Grandpa Aaron Rabinowitz: What do you do when that happens?
Paul Graff: Obviously, nothing, of course.
Grandpa Aaron Rabinowitz: Do you think that's smart?
- साउंडट्रैकAlley Cat
Written by Bent Fabricius-Bjerre
Performed by Bill Justis
Courtesy of Mercury Records
Under license from Universal Music Enterprises
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
- How long is Armageddon Time?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
विवरण
बॉक्स ऑफ़िस
- बजट
- $1,50,00,000(अनुमानित)
- US और कनाडा में सकल
- $18,72,625
- US और कनाडा में पहले सप्ताह में कुल कमाई
- $70,275
- 30 अक्टू॰ 2022
- दुनिया भर में सकल
- $65,38,820
- चलने की अवधि
- 1 घं 54 मि(114 min)
- रंग
- ध्वनि मिश्रण
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 2.39 : 1
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें