IMDb रेटिंग
5.5/10
4.5 हज़ार
आपकी रेटिंग
वर्तमान के निकारागुआ में फंसी एक युवा अमेरिकी पत्रकार को एक रहस्यमय अंग्रेज से प्यार हो जाता है जो उसे वहाँ से निकलने का सबसे अच्छा मौका प्रतीत होता है. वह जल्द ही महसूस करती है कि वह वर्तमा... सभी पढ़ेंवर्तमान के निकारागुआ में फंसी एक युवा अमेरिकी पत्रकार को एक रहस्यमय अंग्रेज से प्यार हो जाता है जो उसे वहाँ से निकलने का सबसे अच्छा मौका प्रतीत होता है. वह जल्द ही महसूस करती है कि वह वर्तमान से भी अधिक खतरे में हो सकती है.वर्तमान के निकारागुआ में फंसी एक युवा अमेरिकी पत्रकार को एक रहस्यमय अंग्रेज से प्यार हो जाता है जो उसे वहाँ से निकलने का सबसे अच्छा मौका प्रतीत होता है. वह जल्द ही महसूस करती है कि वह वर्तमान से भी अधिक खतरे में हो सकती है.
- पुरस्कार
- 1 जीत और कुल 5 नामांकन
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
Seems most of the reviewers missed the point of this film. Or perhaps they've seen/ read the previous material it's based on and had some expectations. I came upon this film without any knowledge of prior material or expectations.
This little film is great as an exploration of how human attraction and bonding works.... when it's put into an accelerating circumstances of life threatening situation. And as a look at sudden intimacy, even codependency, between the "last two people on earth" (well not really, but there's that feel to it) it's actually achieves a lot of depth and freshness, probably because the director is a European woman.
However I can see how some could expect something else from it. The director almost completely disregarded a coherent explanation of what's really going on in the country that puts them in danger. Like yeah the main male character is doing something shady or that's what CIA wants you to think, during tough tumultuous times in a Central American country and gets in trouble for it, but that's practically it. Perhaps she felt it's not important because that's not what she's focusing on, and perhaps if she had focused more on that the film would be more of "casserole" lol and that would not necessarily work or help... But I must agree with some reviewers that the way it's presented now in the film it kind of does give off colonial or even white European/ American colonial vibe. Like, times have changed since the 80s when the original came out (or was it the book that came out then? Not sure), and Americans and Western Europeans are not necessarily seen as the nice guys anymore, and she kind of tried to present too, but it fell flat somehow. Not sure why though... was it the fault of the source material that came out in the 80s or is it the result of Western European sense of elitism, even superiority that they still have? I can't quite put my finger on it yet.
This little film is great as an exploration of how human attraction and bonding works.... when it's put into an accelerating circumstances of life threatening situation. And as a look at sudden intimacy, even codependency, between the "last two people on earth" (well not really, but there's that feel to it) it's actually achieves a lot of depth and freshness, probably because the director is a European woman.
However I can see how some could expect something else from it. The director almost completely disregarded a coherent explanation of what's really going on in the country that puts them in danger. Like yeah the main male character is doing something shady or that's what CIA wants you to think, during tough tumultuous times in a Central American country and gets in trouble for it, but that's practically it. Perhaps she felt it's not important because that's not what she's focusing on, and perhaps if she had focused more on that the film would be more of "casserole" lol and that would not necessarily work or help... But I must agree with some reviewers that the way it's presented now in the film it kind of does give off colonial or even white European/ American colonial vibe. Like, times have changed since the 80s when the original came out (or was it the book that came out then? Not sure), and Americans and Western Europeans are not necessarily seen as the nice guys anymore, and she kind of tried to present too, but it fell flat somehow. Not sure why though... was it the fault of the source material that came out in the 80s or is it the result of Western European sense of elitism, even superiority that they still have? I can't quite put my finger on it yet.
At the beginning we are introduced to the main character of the story who is suppose to be an American journalist in Nicaragua. She is a drunk and sleeps with men to earn money to buy shampoo !! She meets a British character and again sleeps with him for $50 !!
For the next two hours we are suppose to believe her romance with this guy and feel thrilled by their cat and mouse activities with authorities in this country. This film does not have a romantic angle nor a political intrigue to it. You have to insure long sex scenes and useless terrible story line that doesn't go anywhere. I don't understand what was Denis had in mind making this film, probably she loved the book and didn't realize 80s South America doesn't translate good to 2020s. At least she could have spend some time going through the politics of the country or the region. Once again Cannes Film Festival showed they give out their prizes based on whose turn it is to win rather than the quality of what is presented.
For the next two hours we are suppose to believe her romance with this guy and feel thrilled by their cat and mouse activities with authorities in this country. This film does not have a romantic angle nor a political intrigue to it. You have to insure long sex scenes and useless terrible story line that doesn't go anywhere. I don't understand what was Denis had in mind making this film, probably she loved the book and didn't realize 80s South America doesn't translate good to 2020s. At least she could have spend some time going through the politics of the country or the region. Once again Cannes Film Festival showed they give out their prizes based on whose turn it is to win rather than the quality of what is presented.
Unlikeable characters and cast.
Possibly would have been better with different lead actors?
Script seemed poor, and situations unbelievable.
But hey, you may like it? But it wasn't for me.
Possibly would have been better with different lead actors?
Script seemed poor, and situations unbelievable.
But hey, you may like it? But it wasn't for me.
I can't understand the low imdb rating! Dont trust the bad ratings!
Beautifully crafted and perfectly and nicely put together! Stunningly beautifully cinematography! A intimate, erotic, fragile, raw, deep and thrilling story about love, escaping and conspiracy! Amazingly filmed and edited! The work with light is amazing! Gorgeous visuals!
Deserves all its nominations and awards!
Great acting which feels very authentic. Manuscript is perfect with depth.
Acting is very good!
PURE CINEMATIC ART!
Unfortunately a bit too long maybe, the last hour is a bit boring.
I totally recommend this!!!!
Beautifully crafted and perfectly and nicely put together! Stunningly beautifully cinematography! A intimate, erotic, fragile, raw, deep and thrilling story about love, escaping and conspiracy! Amazingly filmed and edited! The work with light is amazing! Gorgeous visuals!
Deserves all its nominations and awards!
Great acting which feels very authentic. Manuscript is perfect with depth.
Acting is very good!
PURE CINEMATIC ART!
Unfortunately a bit too long maybe, the last hour is a bit boring.
I totally recommend this!!!!
Claire Denis once again delivers a film of nuance, sensuality, secrecy. We are treated to excellent performances by Ms. Qualley, & Mr. Alwyn. Supporting roles by Mr. Romano, Mr. Ramirez, & Mr. Safdie contribute well. This world is one of heat, sweat, ruins.
Our protagonists are desperate people. There is subterfuge. There is danger. There's sex. There are secrets. There's heat, in the air and in their touch.
Qualley is riveting. She's on the move. Desperation emanates from her skin. Her glib retorts belie the fear darting from her wide eyes. She is relentless in her ability to look for allies.
Alwyn is at first slow, measured, calm. Later, there's anxiety building within his edifice of control. He is abandoned. He is left.
These are two people caught up in circumstances beyond their control. Each has lost their moorings. Needing each other, yet hesitant to fully trust. They are in their own singular world for which they are ill equipped & poorly prepared.
Sex brings comfort; momentary perhaps, yet with a sense of intimacy and security. They are thrown together on the run.
Denis creates a milieu of darkness, where one cannot see well. Then there cracks letting streaks of light in. Could it be love?
Our protagonists are desperate people. There is subterfuge. There is danger. There's sex. There are secrets. There's heat, in the air and in their touch.
Qualley is riveting. She's on the move. Desperation emanates from her skin. Her glib retorts belie the fear darting from her wide eyes. She is relentless in her ability to look for allies.
Alwyn is at first slow, measured, calm. Later, there's anxiety building within his edifice of control. He is abandoned. He is left.
These are two people caught up in circumstances beyond their control. Each has lost their moorings. Needing each other, yet hesitant to fully trust. They are in their own singular world for which they are ill equipped & poorly prepared.
Sex brings comfort; momentary perhaps, yet with a sense of intimacy and security. They are thrown together on the run.
Denis creates a milieu of darkness, where one cannot see well. Then there cracks letting streaks of light in. Could it be love?
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाRobert Pattinson was originally cast alongside Margaret Qualley as the lead, but had to leave the project due to filming commitments for द बैटमैन (2022) following delays of shooting due to the Covid-19 pandemic. Taron Egerton was cast as Pattinson's replacement, however he dropped out as well before filming started due to personal reasons and Joe Alwyn took the role.
- भाव
Teen Travel Agent: Fuck is a good word. Fuck is the property of the whole world.
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
- How long is Stars at Noon?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
विवरण
बॉक्स ऑफ़िस
- दुनिया भर में सकल
- $2,25,509
- चलने की अवधि2 घंटे 15 मिनट
- रंग
- ध्वनि मिश्रण
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 2.39 : 1
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें