Romeo and Juliet: Beyond Words

A great way to present a difficult genre. The use of location filming and cinema techniques works brilliantly and brings something genuinely new to the art. I can imagine that some purists may not enjoy it but this is very accessible and may well bring a new audience to ballet who would not normally seek it out.

Francesca Hayward's Juliet is absolutely beautiful. She's adapted the role from the stage production to the big screen in a way that other ballerinas with more years behind them would struggle to do. All of the RB's dancers did very well in a heritage piece for the company and should be proud.

However:

All of the shots are really badly blocked and framed. People in the courtyard and Capulet ball scenes were consistently walking in front of the camera and across the shot, with the iconic balcony & bedroom pas de deuxs being obstructed by plants and curtains. Not to mention the fountain directly in the middle of one of the courtyard scenes that was shown about 20 times for no particular reason. In a regular film, this would be bad, but with dancers it works even less due to their lower bodies being constantly cut off. The genius subtleties of Kenneth Macmillan's choreography (e.g., Juliet's bourrées around the Nurse in the scene where she first meets Paris that are echoed just before she decides to drink poison) are lost imo.

The bad blocking is most evident at the beginning when the Capulet & Montague boys fight. It's hard to describe if you haven't seen the stage production, but onstage it works perfectly and the first sword fight scene leaves you in awe - but since basic rules of cinematography aren't followed throughout, the scene becomes cramped and messy so you have no sense of anybody's location. What's supposed to be a peak moment of the ballet seems confusing and small-scale when it should be grandiose. It's a similar problem with the Capulet ball scene.

I understand why this filming style was chosen. R&J Beyond Words is meant to look realistic. Unfortunately, it hinders the choreography and just comes off more peeping Tom.

I hope that Balletboyz continue to make more ballets into films. R&J was a solid attempt that still works because the combo of talented dancers and classic stories can't really fail. I think film cinematographers and people that specialise in translating choreography to film are needed.

I know, beautiful is not the fair term about a ballet adaptation . But it works in this case for so many motifs. Each scene is precise seductive. The film represents admirable demonstration of the force of Royal Ballet. The spirit of play is reflected in splendid manner. All is seductive and precise and poetic and, ater other adaptations, this seems not only precious , not the best but just the fair one, giving all the tension, fragility, drama and poetry of the play. So, jut, just, just beautiful.

R&J Beyond Words is the first ballet movie I saw. I also haven't seen this ballet on the stage and won't be able to compare it.

1. Actors play. Francesca Hayward looked essential in her role - young, naive, and delicate. Juliets feelings are understandable event there is no single line. The character is fully uncovered and understandable. Unfortunately, all others do not bring the same feelings. I didn't get the temper, intentions, and philosophy of any other character. Random face mimics, characters appear and disappear, randomly their mood is changed without a clear reason why. Without lines, the only cinema language here would be - face mimics, body moves, and music. Neither faces nor bodies told me a story.

2. Choreography. Impressed with Francesca again. Probably if there were more solos of each main character - I would understand them better. But everything was mixed in a chaotic way + hard to follow because of really bad camera work.

3. Camera & Film editing. Dance scenes were often cut... I can see a dancer in a medium shot at the beginning and suddenly his legs are partially cut? Then I can see a close-up of the static face with no emotions while they dance? Lots of close-ups are just not justified and useless. While the dance is missed. Framing. In the scene when Juliet dances for Romeo - she is cut, the rule of thirds again failed, lots of people close/around her, and no Romeo. We can see him montaged in close-ups a couple of times... I want to see both actors in the same medium shot scene. The tension between them and do not care about other people's faces. They are secondary. But instead, Juliet looks standalone. In close-ups, faces are often... blurred. If that was on purpose - then I didn't get the point.

4. Music. All fans would hate me here. But, in 2020 we might need more tragedy in really sad moments. For example - the finale scene. Romeo died and Juliet wakes up - light and delicate music (Yes, I am sorry for not knowing what is the title of this composition). Then she sees Romeo and her face screams - but the music is the same. The mood is changed - but the sound remains the same. I can't share her pain with the kind and optimistic composition.

In general, I love the idea. I would not watch it again because of the camera and editing. But hope that if we have more such movies - it would become better. If anyone knows a good example of camera work for a ballet movie - I would be thankful if you share it with me :)

Romeo And Juliet: Beyond Words (Ballet) (2019) -

At the beginning, apart from the lovely legs and bums in tights, which I enjoyed greatly, I wasn't sure what to make of this film in its slightly less traditional dance format, although I did know that there was a balletic version available.

I had recently watched Baz Luhrmann's 'William Shakespeare's Romeo And Juliet' (1996) and Josh O'Connor in 'Romeo And Juliet' (2021 TV Movie), both delivering the story in a way that was entertaining and in the case of the latter, quite stunning, but I hadn't been expecting this one to be a ballet, especially not based on the synopsis I had read, which said and I quote "In a language we all understand", leaving me to believe it was going to be delivered in modern English rather than movement.

Moving on from the surprise I found the whole thing incredibly frantic and if I hadn't known the story beforehand, I believed that I would have been completely lost. I actually wasn't entirely sure what was going on despite my recent refresh thanks to Leo and Josh.

The street scenes distracted from the dancing, because there was too much background action taking place to focus on the ballet.

The supporting artists and the cast not in immediate use, were all moving around too prominently and pulling focus from the main cast.

And some of the dances, the group numbers in particular, looked something more likely to be found on an amateur stage than in a professional production.

I felt that I might be watching an outdoor theatre/stage performance in a castle grounds or stately home, by a local am-dram society, because it definitely lacked the lustre of a cinematic film, including the skilled lighting, camera direction and overall direction that it should have had. That might have quietened the visuals to allow the beauty of the dances to shine. The ones that didn't look as amateur that is.

However, the costumes were beautiful and the set seemed apt. A spoken word version touring through the same location would probably have worked very well and the spaces were ample for the dances in the ball scenes and so on.

What I also couldn't get along with though was having seen or rather heard it used for so many other things, I did feel that the "The Apprentice" (2005-) soundtrack (The music for the ballet by Sergei Prokofiev) was a tad alarmist for what it was trying to depict as well. It seemed that it was more like a fight with a wolf than a romantic dance or canoodling.

Honestly, I probably only made it as far as I did, before I turned it off, because of Romeo's (William Bracewell) bottom in those strides, but I just couldn't finish it.

I had already turned off another film that evening, so maybe it just wasn't my night and my mood was off, but even a few days later I can't imagine that this would be something that I might try to watch again.

Unscored as unfinished.