गेम ऑफ थ्रोन्स की घटनाओं से दो सौ साल पहले, हाउस टार्गैरियन की कहानी को दर्शाया गया है.गेम ऑफ थ्रोन्स की घटनाओं से दो सौ साल पहले, हाउस टार्गैरियन की कहानी को दर्शाया गया है.गेम ऑफ थ्रोन्स की घटनाओं से दो सौ साल पहले, हाउस टार्गैरियन की कहानी को दर्शाया गया है.
- 2 प्राइमटाइम एमी जीते
- 22 जीत और कुल 97 नामांकन
एपिसोड ब्राउज़ करें
8.3495.9K
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
सारांश
Reviewers say 'House of the Dragon' is acclaimed for its storytelling, political intrigue, and Targaryen saga. Exceptional performances by Paddy Considine, Emma D'Arcy, and Matt Smith are highlighted. Stunning production design, elaborate costumes, and CGI dragons are praised. The show balances epic scale with intimate drama and stays true to George R. R. Martin's lore. However, some note pacing issues and lack of emotional connection.
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
The True Reign: A Perfect Return to Westeros
House of the Dragon is not merely a prequel; it's a masterfully crafted tragedy that complements Game of Thrones very well by filling in the rich historical tapestry of Westeros. Instead of trying to replicate the sprawling, world-spanning chaos of the original series, it wisely chooses a more focused and intimate approach, zeroing in on a single, doomed family. This laser-like focus allows for a deeper exploration of its characters and their devastating political machinations, driven by ambition, legacy, and patriarchal expectations. It successfully captures the same moral ambiguity and high-stakes political intrigue that made its predecessor a global phenomenon.
A significant part of the show's success lies in its excellent CG, which brings the age of dragons to vivid and terrifying life. The dragons here are not just CGI props; they are fully realized characters with their own personalities and relationships to their riders. Each one, from the ancient and colossal Vhagar to the fierce Caraxes, is rendered with stunning detail and a sense of weight that makes every flight and every fiery breath feel truly epic. The visual effects team deserves immense credit for making these mythical beasts feel so grounded in the world, allowing the story's spectacle to feel both grand and emotionally resonant.
While a few pacing choices in the first season felt rushed, House of the Dragon is an undeniable triumph. It is a compelling, beautiful, and faithful return to a world we thought we knew, proving that even a story we know the end of can still be an unforgettable journey.
Summary: A beautifully shot and compelling prequel that enriches the lore of Westeros, featuring stunning visuals and a more contained, character-driven plot. A must-watch for any fan.
A significant part of the show's success lies in its excellent CG, which brings the age of dragons to vivid and terrifying life. The dragons here are not just CGI props; they are fully realized characters with their own personalities and relationships to their riders. Each one, from the ancient and colossal Vhagar to the fierce Caraxes, is rendered with stunning detail and a sense of weight that makes every flight and every fiery breath feel truly epic. The visual effects team deserves immense credit for making these mythical beasts feel so grounded in the world, allowing the story's spectacle to feel both grand and emotionally resonant.
While a few pacing choices in the first season felt rushed, House of the Dragon is an undeniable triumph. It is a compelling, beautiful, and faithful return to a world we thought we knew, proving that even a story we know the end of can still be an unforgettable journey.
Summary: A beautifully shot and compelling prequel that enriches the lore of Westeros, featuring stunning visuals and a more contained, character-driven plot. A must-watch for any fan.
Season 2 wasn't very good
Being a huge fan of Game of Thrones I couldn't wait until House of the Dragon came out. Then when it did I actually enjoyed it. Season 1 was pretty good, not GoT good but still good. Well, it didn't last because season 2 was a major drop off in quality. The thing I disliked the most was the time jump came, it just came way too early. I would've liked to seen more of the earlier episode years before they jumped ahead. I'm hoping season 3 will be better but I'm adjusting my expectations.
Not as good as Game of Thrones
I loved Game of Thrones but wasn't really sure what to expect when I first heard about this but the trailers looked pretty good so I gave it a chance. Then after reading the critics reviews and listening to all hype that was surrounding the show I was expecting this to be the next great series. It's not. I should have known since the reviews are so mixed but people were hyping it up for months and again the trailers were pretty good. I'm a few episodes into season 2 right now and it's going to be a struggle to finish the rest of the season. It definitely hasn't been nearly as good as I thought it would be and judging by the mixed reviews I'm guessing the rest of the season will be much of the same.
House of the Dragons Season 1
Good first season. Some of the events feel skimmed through because of the time skip, some of the consequences to what happens during the course of the show take place off air because of the abruptly timed time skip. One of the main examples for this would be Viserys' reaction to the illicit relationship between his daughter and Daemon on multiple occasions when she was a child or Lord Corlys' long term response to Viserys' rejection of his proposal. And the relationship between Rhanerya and Daemon itself seemed under developed, the only possible reason Rhanerya had to wed him was it would strengthen her claim to the throne, other than their whole relationship was built on cryptic conversation that takes place in the Valryian language. Other than that the show is too immersive and it's hard to take sides as both of them have done many wrongs and are good in certain instances, it was nice to see all that slow burn drama that took place to unfold.
Was hoping for better
Game of Thrones was one of my favorite shows of all-time so I couldn't wait for House of the Dragon. I've now caught up and seen every episode so far and my main takeaway is...this should be and could've been a lot better. While it's already another hit for HBO I think that has to be on name alone. If this wasn't a spin-off I don't think it would be doing so well. People have to be watching because they liked GoT and are waiting for this to be as good. Well, we're now two seasons into it and this is not GoT quality. I've never read the books to these shows so I had no expectations when it came to that but I wouldn't care if it varied from the source material even if I did. I don't get why so many people care if a movie/show is different from the source material. As long as it's entertaining...who cares? They have to adapt these books for the screen. Well, this is not entertaining. Sure, there are a few minutes here and there but overall disappointing.
साउंडट्रैक
यहां साउंडट्रैक का पूर्वावलोकन करें और Amazon Music पर सुनना जारी रखें.
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाThe Iron Throne has been greatly redesigned from Game of Thrones (2011). It is larger and more asymmetrical to more closely match the description in George R.R. Martin's novels, although it is still nowhere near that big: the throne in the books is a 40-foot, immovable, asymmetrical behemoth made from 1000 swords welded together, with the seat 20 feet above the ground, and only accessible by a flight of stairs; the person sitting on it addresses people down below from 40 feet away.
- क्रेज़ी क्रेडिटThe first season's title sequence is centered on a model of the Old Valyria citadel, with blood trails running across the land and marked by symbols of the Targeryn family.
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
विवरण
- रिलीज़ की तारीख़
- कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
- आधिकारिक साइटें
- भाषा
- इस रूप में भी जाना जाता है
- La casa del dragón
- फ़िल्माने की जगहें
- उत्पादन कंपनियां
- IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें
- चलने की अवधि
- 1 घं(60 min)
- रंग
- ध्वनि मिश्रण
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें






