IMDb रेटिंग
5.2/10
6.8 हज़ार
आपकी रेटिंग
1934. मिरांडा ग्रीन और पांच अन्य अजनबियों को अरबपति लुईस फाइंडली के दूरस्थ द्वीप हवेली में आमंत्रित किया गया है. जैसे-जैसे सप्ताहांत बढ़ता है, उन्हें क्यों आमंत्रित किया गया है, इस बारे में ... सभी पढ़ें1934. मिरांडा ग्रीन और पांच अन्य अजनबियों को अरबपति लुईस फाइंडली के दूरस्थ द्वीप हवेली में आमंत्रित किया गया है. जैसे-जैसे सप्ताहांत बढ़ता है, उन्हें क्यों आमंत्रित किया गया है, इस बारे में सुराग एक भयावह रहस्य के साथ सामने आने लगते हैं.1934. मिरांडा ग्रीन और पांच अन्य अजनबियों को अरबपति लुईस फाइंडली के दूरस्थ द्वीप हवेली में आमंत्रित किया गया है. जैसे-जैसे सप्ताहांत बढ़ता है, उन्हें क्यों आमंत्रित किया गया है, इस बारे में सुराग एक भयावह रहस्य के साथ सामने आने लगते हैं.
Bianca A. Santos
- Carmen Blanco
- (as Bianca Santos)
Pete Berwick
- Patron
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
Miranda Green (Mischa Barton) is a florist in 30's England. She is skilled in observing and is obsessed with murder mystery books especially those of Agatha Christie. She receives a mysterious invitation from unknown textile tycoon Lord Findley. She joins five other guests on a passenger train to his island estate. There are three staff members but Lord Findley is apparently late in arriving. Soon, Miranda gets her murder mystery to solve.
I liked about two thirds of this movie. It has the Agatha Christie feel. Initially, the main problem is its artificial tone. It doesn't help that these people are going to this place for nothing more than curiosity. Miranda would do it, but only one other seems to have the motivation. It's a murder mystery whodunnit. It's fun. Then the last section tries to solve the mystery quickly and randomly. I don't like a lot of the last third. In the age of streaming, this needs more time and this could be two or three part series. In an aside, I did not recognize Mischa Barton. I assumed that she's some random English actress.
I liked about two thirds of this movie. It has the Agatha Christie feel. Initially, the main problem is its artificial tone. It doesn't help that these people are going to this place for nothing more than curiosity. Miranda would do it, but only one other seems to have the motivation. It's a murder mystery whodunnit. It's fun. Then the last section tries to solve the mystery quickly and randomly. I don't like a lot of the last third. In the age of streaming, this needs more time and this could be two or three part series. In an aside, I did not recognize Mischa Barton. I assumed that she's some random English actress.
So the acting in this flick is absolutely terrible but it certainly did not get any help from the writing. I am a life long fan of Agatha Christie and other mystery authors, as well as some film noir and I'm a little crazy about giallos. I also love a good mystery-comedy like the 1985 classic, Clue: The Movie with Tim Curry and Madeline Kahn. I would go as far as to say that Clue is one of my top five favorite films of all time. I thought more recent films like Knives Out and See How They Run were both fun and entertaining, while not being up to my highest standards. BUT THIS....did a teenager write this screenplay as fan fiction or what?
Casting a middle aged woman as the obnoxious but lovable, brilliant Hercule Poirot in a skirt could have worked. Could have. An older, curvier Mischa Barton can't plod through movies on her youthful glamorous looks anymore - she's borderline unrecognizable as an average, curvy blonde of about 40 - but that's not the problem: she can't act.
At bottom it is the writing that is terrible, though, that much is clear by the multiple caricatures which should be delightful and funny but just end up coming across as wooden and ridiculous.
There is a enormous dark house with chandeliers, and I do love a nice pair of vintage curtains.
Casting a middle aged woman as the obnoxious but lovable, brilliant Hercule Poirot in a skirt could have worked. Could have. An older, curvier Mischa Barton can't plod through movies on her youthful glamorous looks anymore - she's borderline unrecognizable as an average, curvy blonde of about 40 - but that's not the problem: she can't act.
At bottom it is the writing that is terrible, though, that much is clear by the multiple caricatures which should be delightful and funny but just end up coming across as wooden and ridiculous.
There is a enormous dark house with chandeliers, and I do love a nice pair of vintage curtains.
A bit slow and plodding with some questionable acting and some atrocious attempts at acents. The script writing is somewhat lacking and the there's not much of a plot. By the time the titles roll at the ninety minute mark it feels like it's been half an hour too long. The characters are all a bit wooden and the actors seemed to be simply going through the motions. None of them seemed to engage with their character and I couldn't engage with them either.
Has a made for TV feel to it and I would strongly suggest it's not worth going to the cinema to see.
It's not terrible but it's not good either. If you're really bored then maybe give it a whirl.
Has a made for TV feel to it and I would strongly suggest it's not worth going to the cinema to see.
It's not terrible but it's not good either. If you're really bored then maybe give it a whirl.
This is a murder mystery in a setting similar to films like Murder on the Orient Express and Clue, sadly as much as this isn't a terrible movie, it isn't up there with those classics.
On the plus side, the story is quite compelling and doesn't go in the obvious direction. It's also not stuffed with too much filler.
Unfortunately there are some major criticisms i have with this, not least the atrocious accents that range from Traditional English to Pantomine Dame. However it's the main character where's i have most issues. First off, she looks like she's walked in right off the catwalk, not Mid 20th Century England, but worse than that, is how her character behaves. Are we really to believe a group of Adults, most older than her, are going to be bossed around like school Children by a Florist. She even gives orders to the Detective. Why on Earth would anyone let a normal civilian interrogate and order them around, even if she was good at selling murders. At least Jesscia Fletcher of Murder she wrote had the decency to speak to people with respect, this woman was a trumped up snob that in reality would be laughed at. This is a shame, because it's so distracting from the movie, it means it's quite hard to get into.
Still, if you have 90 mins free and there's no better options, it should prevent boredom.
On the plus side, the story is quite compelling and doesn't go in the obvious direction. It's also not stuffed with too much filler.
Unfortunately there are some major criticisms i have with this, not least the atrocious accents that range from Traditional English to Pantomine Dame. However it's the main character where's i have most issues. First off, she looks like she's walked in right off the catwalk, not Mid 20th Century England, but worse than that, is how her character behaves. Are we really to believe a group of Adults, most older than her, are going to be bossed around like school Children by a Florist. She even gives orders to the Detective. Why on Earth would anyone let a normal civilian interrogate and order them around, even if she was good at selling murders. At least Jesscia Fletcher of Murder she wrote had the decency to speak to people with respect, this woman was a trumped up snob that in reality would be laughed at. This is a shame, because it's so distracting from the movie, it means it's quite hard to get into.
Still, if you have 90 mins free and there's no better options, it should prevent boredom.
Seems to be a remake of agatha christie's novel "and then there were none". They even mention christie by name in the first minute! Micha barton is miranda green. She notices little details. So when guests at an estate start dying, she's determined to figure it out before the police arrive. Alex hyde white (plays sean, the butler) is the son of wilfrid hyde white, who was in the 1965 version of ten little indians! And in some other pretty big films too. My fair lady, third man. It's mostly good. Never gets too suspenseful, but there are some twists and turns. The guests' stories near the end really slow down the story. They seem to drag on and on. And one demerit for some silly little mistakes that a solid christie fan probably would not make. Directed by stephen shimek.
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाAlex Hyde-White (Sean) is the son of Wilfrid Hyde-White who appeared in the film 'Ten Little Indians', an adaptation of the Agatha Christie novel that inspired this film
- गूफ़Miranda reads in a book that Findley is worth billions. In the time in which this movie is set, in Britain, a billion is not a thousand million but a million million. As such, there was nobody worth billions in the world, and a British book would not have made that claim about anybody.
- कनेक्शनFollowed by Murder at the Embassy
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
- How long is Invitation to a Murder?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
विवरण
- रिलीज़ की तारीख़
- कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
- आधिकारिक साइट
- भाषा
- इस रूप में भी जाना जाता है
- Invitación a un asesinato
- फ़िल्माने की जगहें
- उत्पादन कंपनियां
- IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें
बॉक्स ऑफ़िस
- दुनिया भर में सकल
- $12,860
- चलने की अवधि
- 1 घं 32 मि(92 min)
- रंग
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 2.39:1
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें