IMDb रेटिंग
6.0/10
57 हज़ार
आपकी रेटिंग
तीन युवतियां गलती से सैंडर्सन सिस्टर्स को आधुनिक सलेम में वापस ले आती हैं और उन्हें यह पता लगाना होगा कि बच्चे की भूखी चुड़ैलों को दुनिया पर कहर बरपाने से कैसे रोका जाए.तीन युवतियां गलती से सैंडर्सन सिस्टर्स को आधुनिक सलेम में वापस ले आती हैं और उन्हें यह पता लगाना होगा कि बच्चे की भूखी चुड़ैलों को दुनिया पर कहर बरपाने से कैसे रोका जाए.तीन युवतियां गलती से सैंडर्सन सिस्टर्स को आधुनिक सलेम में वापस ले आती हैं और उन्हें यह पता लगाना होगा कि बच्चे की भूखी चुड़ैलों को दुनिया पर कहर बरपाने से कैसे रोका जाए.
- 3 प्राइमटाइम एमी के लिए नामांकित
- 2 जीत और कुल 16 नामांकन
Juju Journey Brener
- Young Sarah
- (as Juju Brener)
सारांश
Reviewers say 'Hocus Pocus 2' is appreciated for nostalgic elements, the return of the Sanderson sisters, and fun performances. Callbacks and new songs are enjoyed, though humor is sometimes criticized as too kid-friendly or forced. The film's exploration of sisterhood and emotional moments resonate, yet it faces criticism for a weak plot, underdeveloped new characters, and a lack of the original's magic. Despite mixed reviews, it is seen as a fun, if imperfect, sequel.
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
Not bad but super lackluster compared to the original!
It lacked sincerity and feeling. In fact, I didn't feel much of anything throughout except frustration. Whereas the first one made me laugh and cry the whole way through, this one was really ho-hum, except for the very end- and I only laughed once!
Like I said, there is a feeling of insincerity to this one. It's basically a parody of itself, whereas the original feels like a genuine classic. And a lot of the stuff in this felt forced and just annoying.
Also, no Max, Dani, or Allison in this one, and I was really looking forward to their return!
Glad I watched, but overall, a letdown and super lame.
UPDATE: Okay, it's only lame in comparison to the original, but not lame overall. I just can't stay mad at a Hocus Pocus movie- anything with these 3 sisters is cool with me, and I hope there are more sequels!
It lacked sincerity and feeling. In fact, I didn't feel much of anything throughout except frustration. Whereas the first one made me laugh and cry the whole way through, this one was really ho-hum, except for the very end- and I only laughed once!
Like I said, there is a feeling of insincerity to this one. It's basically a parody of itself, whereas the original feels like a genuine classic. And a lot of the stuff in this felt forced and just annoying.
Also, no Max, Dani, or Allison in this one, and I was really looking forward to their return!
Glad I watched, but overall, a letdown and super lame.
UPDATE: Okay, it's only lame in comparison to the original, but not lame overall. I just can't stay mad at a Hocus Pocus movie- anything with these 3 sisters is cool with me, and I hope there are more sequels!
Took sheer will power to get through the first 10 minutes it was like watching a middle school play. The 3 young witches were acting like they were waiting for us audience members to clap for how "cute" they were acting and it wasn't cute. So goofy! In a bad way. Terrible over the top acting!!! Everyone was trying way too hard. The first one felt grounded in reality within the fantasy of it, we could relate to the characters and it is such a great comfort movie I have watched every Halloween. This movie belongs at the bottom of the trash bin in what I would label as generic. All the actors were acting with a capital A! It's trying way too hard. The one playing the boyfriend, Froy something was so animatedly over acting it was painful. You may like this film if you're of the brainless and passive influencer crowd, but I don't know how a fan of the original could love this. I feel violated. Casting and films today are all about cheap optics and not good story telling.
Why? Why? Why?
I wanted to like this, I tried desperately to find an ounce of the old magic. Alas, it was.gone.
A contrived, unimaginative senseless film that should've been more.
It wasn't bad, but I hoped for so much better. It felt dull and lacklustre. The music scenes seemed shoehorned in for the sake of it.
Oddly enough, there was some good bits and incidental comedy, hence the 4 stars. Sadly there wasn't enough.
In my opinion, the casting was ok. The script could've so much better though.
It reminded me of the ghost busters film reboot, it added nothing and took so much more away.
On the whole, it was ok.
I wanted to like this, I tried desperately to find an ounce of the old magic. Alas, it was.gone.
A contrived, unimaginative senseless film that should've been more.
It wasn't bad, but I hoped for so much better. It felt dull and lacklustre. The music scenes seemed shoehorned in for the sake of it.
Oddly enough, there was some good bits and incidental comedy, hence the 4 stars. Sadly there wasn't enough.
In my opinion, the casting was ok. The script could've so much better though.
It reminded me of the ghost busters film reboot, it added nothing and took so much more away.
On the whole, it was ok.
I'll try my best to not spoil it...
It was a fun film, has nothing on the original sadly.
Referring to the 1993 movie with someone in the film watching the original! How's that possible!
I feel they tried too hard here at times Some of the jokes just over the top As much as the sets looked good, they also looked fake I feel kids will like it but the long time fans will enjoy it just not love it as much as the original
Lots of links to the first and hooks to match them up, but 3 key people missing with no real mention yet the evens were.
As I said it's fun, very "camp" can I say that?
I didn't have much hope for it and I was right for that, I also predicted the store for the main character
Also, the story of where Book came from was changed for this film
Will I watch it again, yeah of course and in time it more than likely might become a classic no brain power needed movie.
But the original will never be beaten that's for sure.
Disney just don't do a Ghostbuster on us now... I feel that could happen
As as for the 2 cut scenes.
It was a fun film, has nothing on the original sadly.
Referring to the 1993 movie with someone in the film watching the original! How's that possible!
I feel they tried too hard here at times Some of the jokes just over the top As much as the sets looked good, they also looked fake I feel kids will like it but the long time fans will enjoy it just not love it as much as the original
Lots of links to the first and hooks to match them up, but 3 key people missing with no real mention yet the evens were.
As I said it's fun, very "camp" can I say that?
I didn't have much hope for it and I was right for that, I also predicted the store for the main character
Also, the story of where Book came from was changed for this film
Will I watch it again, yeah of course and in time it more than likely might become a classic no brain power needed movie.
But the original will never be beaten that's for sure.
Disney just don't do a Ghostbuster on us now... I feel that could happen
As as for the 2 cut scenes.
I don't understand how fans of the first film would want to trash this.
The story offers a mix of prequel information, first film nostalgia and a decent revival of our characters. It isn't without flaws but after nearly thirty years, I found the plot interesting and fun to watch. The characters are older but still gave nice performances and the new characters weren't awful.
Most sequels fail to live up to the original film and you know this before sitting down but that doesn't mean they aren't fun to watch. I personally liked seeing the characters brought back and can honestly say that I enjoyed the experience. In my opinion, had the 1993 original not been made, simply cutting the references to it would've made this a fine stand alone film.
To each their own.
The story offers a mix of prequel information, first film nostalgia and a decent revival of our characters. It isn't without flaws but after nearly thirty years, I found the plot interesting and fun to watch. The characters are older but still gave nice performances and the new characters weren't awful.
Most sequels fail to live up to the original film and you know this before sitting down but that doesn't mean they aren't fun to watch. I personally liked seeing the characters brought back and can honestly say that I enjoyed the experience. In my opinion, had the 1993 original not been made, simply cutting the references to it would've made this a fine stand alone film.
To each their own.
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाOn the podcast Inside of You (2018), Doug Jones said that the wig he wears as Billy Butcherson in this movie is the same one he wore in the first movie.
- गूफ़Gilbert states that as a child, he witnessed the climatic finale of the first movie, but in said film, all the children of Salem were under Sarah's trance at this point, marching towards the Sanderson cottage. Gilbert is clearly capable of performing magic and therefore, it's possible, he may be immune, like the Sanderson Sisters.
- भाव
Winifred Sanderson: [from trailer] Lock up your children! Yes, Salem, we're back!
- क्रेज़ी क्रेडिटSPOILER: There is a scene after the closing credits: Cobweb the black cat jumps onto a shelf next to a box containing a second Black Flame candle.
- कनेक्शनEdited from Hocus Pocus (1993)
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
- How long is Hocus Pocus 2?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
विवरण
- रिलीज़ की तारीख़
- कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
- आधिकारिक साइट
- भाषा
- इस रूप में भी जाना जाता है
- Abracadabra 2
- फ़िल्माने की जगहें
- Newport Rhode Island, संयुक्त राज्य अमेरिका(Washington Square, aka: Eisenhower Park and Touro Street)
- उत्पादन कंपनियां
- IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें
बॉक्स ऑफ़िस
- बजट
- $10,00,00,000(अनुमानित)
- चलने की अवधि1 घंटा 43 मिनट
- रंग
- ध्वनि मिश्रण
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 2.20 : 1
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें