Overrun

If you've ever wanted to see Cenk Uygur pretend to be an ex-marine super assassin, this is the movie for you.

The fights are unconvincing, the fight sequences have many obvious plot gaps the size of Alaska (you literally see a guy cover a live grenade with his hat and the only thing to get shredded is his pants).

It wants to be Tarantino, but ends up an inept, poor copy of the genre. Entirely unrealistic, but not in the good Tarantino way, generic and bland. And the main protagonist... sorry, was Danny DeVito unavailable?

Only reason I watched this was of Bruce Dern. IMDB gives a 7.9 rating must watch. Worst movie ever!! No plot, no acting, no nothing. Nothing in this movie is worth watching. Stupid, no action and fake moves. Main actor, and all other actors showed no talent. Big regrets for watching this flick. Doesn't even rate a "B" class. Who the hell gives it such a high rating? Sick!

I checked this film out on a whim and it was a real treat. It's not the greatest movie of all time but it is for sure one of the best low budget films I've seen in awhile.

The story is very simple but that's also what makes it fun as it chooses a more stylistic approach over a heavy concept. It's less of a morality tale and more of a roller coaster ride, driving you from one scene to the next at break neck speed. Its characters are over the top and intriguing.

Speaking of characters the cast does a great job of bringing them to life. While some performances are definitely stronger than others, the ones that work really work. The stand out for me was the hacker, Auggie played by Jack Griffo. His wit and comedic timing stole every scene he was in. All the characters managed to pull me in and made me care about this over the top world that the filmmakers created.

The fights and the effects were extremely well done, especially for a film of this level. There were areas where you could tell they pushed the limits of their budget but nothing was so off that it took me out of the experience.

Overall it was a fun watch that kept me entertained as long as you're okay with a more "style over substance" type of film. If you're a fan of action and zany characters this give this a shot.

Seriously, who gave this 6.8 stars? Did the person watch the movie at all? Very poor acting and predictable scenes. Don't waste your time.

Square to the bitter end, its an attempt , and with just a loose story and in my opinion wrong use of a 100% clear picture filming, instead of smoky and hazy environments you have almost a sterile and even a facemasked environment, a kitchen without damp and smoke. And the location settings so slick and free of anything that might disturb your attention, its just too nicely made , and leads me back to bbc.tv productions from the late 1970's, where the crystal is so clear...

but its an actioncomedy where the protagonist eats the opportunist and the antagonist plays high voltage snooker with the agonists, purely made for the fans of mockup movies, there are sections that are just brilliantly fun, but they are short and drowns in its badly made action scenes, dead men that cant stand still, and well groomed stallion-hudlum- actors that just waits and seeks the uppercuts and meatgrinding jackets made of solid lead, a script composed for the untrained part of the cast, and uses bruce dern for all he is worth just to make a poster with a name we all know.

So the grumpy old man delivers a weak 5 stars to this remnants of a supernova living its afterlife as a brown dwarf, its definately not a film that should be seen rather a could be seen movie along with a beer and your buddies, cause it has its moments of caricatour caracters that will make you smile, even though the superhero and revenge feeling fails to come.