न्यूयॉर्क शहर में स्थिति, निर्मम हेरफेर और उच्च-दाँव वाले सत्ता के खेलों की इस निओ-नुआर शैली की थ्रिलर फ़िल्म में कोई भी वैसा नहीं है जैसे वे दिखाई देते हैं।न्यूयॉर्क शहर में स्थिति, निर्मम हेरफेर और उच्च-दाँव वाले सत्ता के खेलों की इस निओ-नुआर शैली की थ्रिलर फ़िल्म में कोई भी वैसा नहीं है जैसे वे दिखाई देते हैं।न्यूयॉर्क शहर में स्थिति, निर्मम हेरफेर और उच्च-दाँव वाले सत्ता के खेलों की इस निओ-नुआर शैली की थ्रिलर फ़िल्म में कोई भी वैसा नहीं है जैसे वे दिखाई देते हैं।
- पुरस्कार
- 1 जीत
Giullian Yao Gioiello
- Jack
- (as Giullian Gioiello)
Samara Joy
- Singer
- (as Samara Joy McLendon)
कहानी
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाThe chess piece (knight) that Max steals from Richards apartment appears in the Sandra chapter - in the training montage.
- गूफ़In the overhead shot when Tom is walking toward Sandra with the bag containing the money, he hands it to her and she puts it over her right shoulder, and then they start walking. However in the next immediate cut which is a close up of them standing and talking, the action of Tom handing her the bag and Sandra putting it over her right shoulder is repeated.
- कनेक्शनReferenced in OWV Updates: The Seventh OWV Awards - Last Update of 2022 (2022)
- साउंडट्रैकRuler of My Heart
Written by Allen Toussaint (as Naomi Neville)
Performed by Irma Thomas
Courtesy of Capitol Records, LLC under licence from Universal Music Operations Ltd.
फीचर्ड रिव्यू
'Sharper' is my kind of movie. But there's a reason we don't get many of them these days, which I'll get to shortly. It saddens me but I also completely understand it. Still, this movie was a lot of fun and is the kind of film I'm happy to accept will never be perfect.
The problem with the con-artist genre was that the audience became too aware of every move in the playbook. I never call films predictable - and I detest it when people do, because a simple possibility running through your brain at some point in the run time and turning out to be correct does not make something predictable - however this is the kind of film where I can at least forgive that word being thrown around here and there.
Which is ironic because these films were basically designed to be the least predictable of all the genres. They were designed to hit you with a dozen twists, each more shocking than the last. But soon audiences caught on that everything was the opposite of what it seemed and suddenly the films weren't as fun any more.
So anyway, back to 'Sharper'. We see the film from each character's perspective in different segments. It's a really good format for a film like this. We are always getting new information, but we are also seeing information we thought we already knew from a different and altered point of view. It does a great job of keeping the audience invested and on their toes.
The film has good dialogue, a good cast and great pacing. The two hours will fly by even though there is almost nothing in the way of action sequences. For a genre that some might consider DOA, I think 'Sharper' was a pretty good all around effort. 8/10.
The problem with the con-artist genre was that the audience became too aware of every move in the playbook. I never call films predictable - and I detest it when people do, because a simple possibility running through your brain at some point in the run time and turning out to be correct does not make something predictable - however this is the kind of film where I can at least forgive that word being thrown around here and there.
Which is ironic because these films were basically designed to be the least predictable of all the genres. They were designed to hit you with a dozen twists, each more shocking than the last. But soon audiences caught on that everything was the opposite of what it seemed and suddenly the films weren't as fun any more.
So anyway, back to 'Sharper'. We see the film from each character's perspective in different segments. It's a really good format for a film like this. We are always getting new information, but we are also seeing information we thought we already knew from a different and altered point of view. It does a great job of keeping the audience invested and on their toes.
The film has good dialogue, a good cast and great pacing. The two hours will fly by even though there is almost nothing in the way of action sequences. For a genre that some might consider DOA, I think 'Sharper' was a pretty good all around effort. 8/10.
- jtindahouse
- 18 फ़र॰ 2023
- परमालिंक
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
- How long is Sharper?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
विवरण
- चलने की अवधि1 घंटा 56 मिनट
- रंग
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 2.39 : 1
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें