Grrr...

This movie is plain DULL. The songs and the lyrics are worst. The makers should be eaten by lion.

There is zero creativity. The end.

This movie is plain DULL. The songs and the lyrics are worst. The makers should be eaten by lion.

There is zero creativity. There is zero creativity.

This movie is plain DULL. The songs and the lyrics are worst. The makers should be eaten by lion. There is zero creativity. There is zero creativity.

This movie is plain DULL. The songs and the lyrics are worst. The makers should be eaten by lion. This movie is plain DULL. The songs and the lyrics are worst. The makers should be eaten by lion.

*** Grrr Malayalam Movie Review ***

Directed by Jay. K starring Kunchacko Boban Suraj Venjaramoodu in lead roles. Also starring Anagha, Sruti Ramchandran, Manju Pillai & Rajesh Madhavan

One Line Review : Expected Laughter got shot by a tranquilizer gun.

The story is about Rajimon Nadar played by Kunchacko getting drunk and falling into the lion's den in a Zoo located in Trivandrum. Now how the security officer Haridas played by Suraj Venjaramoodu and other rescue people tries to rescue forms the rest part.

When I came to know the movie is directed by Ezra Malayalam Movie Director & post seeing the teaser and trailer of Grrr there were expectations but it was not as per the expectation.

Laughter moments the movie produced but it was being severly shot by tranquilizer in the form of week screenplay.

When Haridas also gets stuck up along with Rajimon in lion's den till they are safely taken out there were laughter moments but it was up to mark

The film should have focused more on the survival part with some twists, turns, tension blended with laughter but it didn't capture which made the film fail.

Performance wise, Suraj able to perform his safe zone but that too was limited. Kunchacko Boban was feeling a kind of mis-cast.

Overall a one time watchable over an OTT platform.

Lack of Depth in the Story: While the film is based on an unusual incident, the story lacks depth and feels shallow.

* Flat Comedy: Despite being marketed as a comedy, the humor falls flat in many parts. Most jokes feel forced and fail to elicit laughter from the audience.

* Average Acting: The acting performances from some of the actors are mediocre. They struggle to fully embody their characters.

* Special Effects: The special effects, especially the lion scenes, appear inadequate and out of place.

* Screenplay: The screenplay has several weaknesses, such as unnecessarily long scenes and weak dialogues.

* Direction: The direction lacks a clear vision. The film's pacing is slow, and it fails to move the story forward effectively.

Specific Negative Reviews (Without Watching the Film): * "The story is so unbelievable that it's hard to believe it's based on a true incident." * "The comedy is offensive to the audience. The jokes are not funny at all." * "The acting is so bad that it's painful to watch." * "The special effects are so poor that it seems like a children's film." * "The screenplay has no emotion. It's just a sequence of events." * "The director had no vision for making such a film." If you can provide more information about the film, I can create a more specific and accurate review.

* Have you watched the film?

* What did you like and dislike about the film?

* What kind of films do you prefer?

Based on your feedback, I can tailor a more personalized review.

Other potential negative points: * The film's length might be excessive.

* The background music might seem faded.

* The film's message might not be clearly conveyed.

Grrr is a straightforward comedic show with no complex structure or storyline. In the film, a young man who becomes drunk and goes into the lion's cage at the zoo is saved. You will undoubtedly laugh for a long time. But there's no sign of acting prowess. A movie that is typically only seen once. Director obviously tried to add something to the movie. However, everything proved to be a nightmare. Because you can only experience the movie's content if you give it some thought. It might have been seen for some time without any further transgressions. The presence of a lion suggests that something interesting will occur. It is possible to argue that the movie is insufficient even with additions. The direction and the screenplay are both mediocre.

I'm not getting how kunjako boben is not concerned with the script. I hole he blindly pick movies. The only good character is done by suraj venjaramud.

I'm not getting how kunjako boben is not concerned with the script. I hole he blindly pick movies. The only good character is done by suraj venjaramud.

I'm not getting how kunjako boben is not concerned with the script. I hole he blindly pick movies. The only good character is done by suraj venjaramud.

I'm not getting how kunjako boben is not concerned with the script. I hole he blindly pick movies. The only good character is done by suraj venjaramud.