अपने अठारहवें जन्मदिन का इंतजार कर रही सारा नियंत्रित करने वाले अपने पिता से दूर जाने का इंतजार कर रही है. वह ऐसा कर सके इससे पहले ही उसके पिता उसे उनके घर के तहखाने में कैद कर लेता है.अपने अठारहवें जन्मदिन का इंतजार कर रही सारा नियंत्रित करने वाले अपने पिता से दूर जाने का इंतजार कर रही है. वह ऐसा कर सके इससे पहले ही उसके पिता उसे उनके घर के तहखाने में कैद कर लेता है.अपने अठारहवें जन्मदिन का इंतजार कर रही सारा नियंत्रित करने वाले अपने पिता से दूर जाने का इंतजार कर रही है. वह ऐसा कर सके इससे पहले ही उसके पिता उसे उनके घर के तहखाने में कैद कर लेता है.
- पुरस्कार
- कुल 1 नामांकन
Michael Lawson
- Investigative Police Officer
- (as Mac Wells)
Alnisa Chislom
- Hospital Reception
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
Shayla Harris
- Nurse Giving CPR
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
I knew something was off the moment our main antagonist delivered his first line of dialogue. He was such an atrociously bad actor throughout the entire film that it genuinely felt like a school project at times. It wasn't until the first cut to black during a tense moment that I realized this is a Lifetime made for TV type movie. With that taken into consideration, it held my attention well enough. What trumps even the poor acting and cinematography was the method of story telling. They attempt the classic move where they show a scene from near he end of the movie and then jump back 20 years earlier, slowly building back up to that moment to continue from it. The problem is that this particular scene shows us that any attempt at escape we see throughout the first hour will be unsuccessful, killing any tension and momentum. This was based off the harrowing real story of Elisabeth Fritzl, and more justice could have been done with it in the film realm.
This film is inspired by the life of Elisabeth Fritzl and the abuse she suffered at the hands of her father, Josef.
I knew going into this that it is not a big budget movie. This is a lifetime movie. I know that people like to hate on these simplistic made for TV films but I happen to enjoy them regardless. As long as the acting is tolerable and the storyline is decently put together. This film met my requirements.
No. It doesn't have the greatest actors but considering the subject matter they were portraying, I thought they were fairly good. The subject matter is awful but there is no need to feel as though you will be watching horror level violence or sexual assaults of an overly graphic nature. This is tame in those regards.
I personally liked the film. I found it to be a decent watch. If you like Lifetime movies, this is going to be right up your alley. If you don't care for those types of films, don't watch it.
I knew going into this that it is not a big budget movie. This is a lifetime movie. I know that people like to hate on these simplistic made for TV films but I happen to enjoy them regardless. As long as the acting is tolerable and the storyline is decently put together. This film met my requirements.
No. It doesn't have the greatest actors but considering the subject matter they were portraying, I thought they were fairly good. The subject matter is awful but there is no need to feel as though you will be watching horror level violence or sexual assaults of an overly graphic nature. This is tame in those regards.
I personally liked the film. I found it to be a decent watch. If you like Lifetime movies, this is going to be right up your alley. If you don't care for those types of films, don't watch it.
This did not come off like the usual Lifetime movie - my comments:
1. Nice to see Judd Nelson working, though the part of the dad is light years away from the Breakfast Club. 2. Though there was not a lot of it, the violence was shocking. 3. The dad character was completely unsympathetic. 4. The ending was satisfying, yet left a lot of questions.
1. Nice to see Judd Nelson working, though the part of the dad is light years away from the Breakfast Club. 2. Though there was not a lot of it, the violence was shocking. 3. The dad character was completely unsympathetic. 4. The ending was satisfying, yet left a lot of questions.
Why would they hire actress Elisabeth Röhm, to direct this film, when she's never been behind a camera before? This was such a troubling and horrific true story event, it needed professionals to tell it. The screenplay was on point, but Röhm's failure to direct her cast and scenes properly, really failed this film. Performances were adequate to decent, but that was strictly from the merits of the actors following a screenplay. Stefanie Scott's performance got better as the movie progressed, but I'm sure that was due to her getting comfortable with her character. Even Judd Nelson's performance was stale and amateurish, that with a better director, he would've shined. Had a seasoned director been involved, this could've been much more gut-wrenching and epic film. Nevertheless, it's a story that needed to be told, and I'm glad it was; It was a bold move for Lifetime to produce this. I just wish it was told in a better way. It's a generous 6/10 from me.
Well done and definitely toned down for TV. I personally think people need to start making movies that actually depict the true horror of the reality we live in. Her true events were 1,000 times more horrific. It doesn't do the victims justice by making the father out to be better than he was. He is pure evil. Men like her father should be tortured every second for the rest of their life.
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाBased on the infamous true story of Elisabeth Fritzl, who was locked up and abused for 24 years (from 1984 to 2008) by her father Josef in Amstetten (Austria). In these years of imprisonment she became the mother of seven children as a result of these abuses.
- गूफ़When the police officer is investigating Sarah's "disappearance", Chris is named as the person who last saw Sarah. When the officer says he wants to go talk to him, Amy says she's going to get Chris' number. The cop then leaves the house before Amy can come back with the phone number, an important lead when conducting an investigation. When Chris comes to bring Sarah the motorcycle helmet, he mentions to Don that the police did question him.
- भाव
Don Cody: When you live in my house, you follow my rules!
Sarah Cody: Get off me!
Irene Cody: Hey! Hey! What's going on here?
- कनेक्शनFeatures Wolf! Wolf! (1944)
- साउंडट्रैकWherever I May Go
Performed by Jake Etheridge and Stefanie Scott
Written by Jake Etheridge and Marie Hines
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
विवरण
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें