1979 में, युवा फिल्म निर्माताओं का एक समूह ग्रामीण टेक्सास में एक वयस्क फिल्म बनाने के लिए जाते हैं, लेकिन जब उनके एकांतप्रिय, बुजुर्ग मेजबान उन्हें अभिनय में पकड़ लेते हैं, तब कलाकार खुद को... सभी पढ़ें1979 में, युवा फिल्म निर्माताओं का एक समूह ग्रामीण टेक्सास में एक वयस्क फिल्म बनाने के लिए जाते हैं, लेकिन जब उनके एकांतप्रिय, बुजुर्ग मेजबान उन्हें अभिनय में पकड़ लेते हैं, तब कलाकार खुद को अपने जीवन के लिए लड़ते हुए पाते हैं.1979 में, युवा फिल्म निर्माताओं का एक समूह ग्रामीण टेक्सास में एक वयस्क फिल्म बनाने के लिए जाते हैं, लेकिन जब उनके एकांतप्रिय, बुजुर्ग मेजबान उन्हें अभिनय में पकड़ लेते हैं, तब कलाकार खुद को अपने जीवन के लिए लड़ते हुए पाते हैं.
- पुरस्कार
- 4 जीत और कुल 43 नामांकन
Geoff Dolan
- Deputy
- (as Geoffrey Dolan)
Matthew J. Saville
- Officer Mitchell
- (as Matthew Saville)
सारांश
Reviewers say 'X' is a horror film that blends 1970s slasher aesthetics with modern elements, praised for its atmosphere and visual style. Mia Goth's dual performance is lauded for complexity, while themes of aging and sexuality resonate deeply. The film's practical effects and gore receive mixed opinions. Some appreciate its thematic richness and artistic qualities, while others criticize its slow pace, predictability, and lack of originality. The transition between the film's halves sparks debate, with varied reactions to its pacing and structure. Overall, 'X' is a mixed bag, appealing to horror enthusiasts yet disappointing some with its flaws.
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
I liked it. It's a nice old-fashioned (flawlessly 70's styled) slasher horror-flick, with a fairly original premise. As in any comparable horror movie the motives for the killings are pretty farfetched, but who cares, when they are pictured so relentlessley gruesome, the gore here is definitely not for the tender-hearted. Another strong point is how the movie very gradually builds up the tension, this is a real slow burner, the apprehension of looming doom is palpable throughout the movie. This is helped by a strong direction, a very clever and inventive editing, and some great photography, see for instance the scene of one of the girls swimming in the lake, while... well, I won't give it away, but it's beautiful and hair-raisingly scary at the same time!
Add to all this some very funny dialogues and goings-on at the start, and you're in for a well made, old-school horror flick, maybe not life-changing but absolutely entertaining for those who can apprciate this kind of movie (like me!).
Add to all this some very funny dialogues and goings-on at the start, and you're in for a well made, old-school horror flick, maybe not life-changing but absolutely entertaining for those who can apprciate this kind of movie (like me!).
I originally watched this film as an introduction to Mia Goth's acting, which I must say is incredible this film. I was thrilled to see such a star studded cast including Jenna Ortega and Brittany Snow. That being said I think the writing did not live up to the casts potential. If you are looking for a nostalgic 70's/80's style slasher film, this might fit the bill. Motives of characters in this film left a lot to be explained and fell short in my eyes. That being said, this film serves as the introductory film to the prequel, "Pearl" which is far more better excecuted and "X" is totally worth the watch just to experience "Pearl" in all it's glory. Overall, his film was good but not great. However, I look forward to the character development in the partner films surrounding this plot line.
Not really a jump scare sort of deal and like if you read the little description about the movie it has all the spoilers in it already.
First point, I thought it was really funny when kid Cudi was standing in the door frame and you could only see his shadow
Secondly For a movie about making a porno, there were adequate number boobs shown.
And the prosthetics used to make the main actor look older we're great. In all worth a watch like most things above 5 stars
Little note to IMDB -Not only do I not want to write a 500 word essay I also would not like reading other peoples 500 word essays. Make it like 200 easy.
First point, I thought it was really funny when kid Cudi was standing in the door frame and you could only see his shadow
Secondly For a movie about making a porno, there were adequate number boobs shown.
And the prosthetics used to make the main actor look older we're great. In all worth a watch like most things above 5 stars
Little note to IMDB -Not only do I not want to write a 500 word essay I also would not like reading other peoples 500 word essays. Make it like 200 easy.
Pros.
It has some decent gore Mostly good acting Lots of 70s horror Easter eggs/references Martin Henderson doing what has to be the best Matthew McConaughey impression I've heard in a long time (seriously I really expected him to say "alright alright alright) The early Eaten Alive nod and final payoff are both hugely effective Really solid soundtrack
Cons.
It's very slow to get started. And not in the gradual suspenseful build up of tension sense, but that very little happens for close to an hour.
Despite wanting to be a really smart horror, the film still falls into the standard tropes of characters being morons who make dumb decisions and doesn't really bring anything original to the table besides better quality (but not perfect) cinematography When the carnage begins, the lighting gets very dark and sometimes obscures the shots and detail which may be a creative choice but does somewhat reduce the enjoyment
Overall, very decent but not a game changer Worth watching.
It has some decent gore Mostly good acting Lots of 70s horror Easter eggs/references Martin Henderson doing what has to be the best Matthew McConaughey impression I've heard in a long time (seriously I really expected him to say "alright alright alright) The early Eaten Alive nod and final payoff are both hugely effective Really solid soundtrack
Cons.
It's very slow to get started. And not in the gradual suspenseful build up of tension sense, but that very little happens for close to an hour.
Despite wanting to be a really smart horror, the film still falls into the standard tropes of characters being morons who make dumb decisions and doesn't really bring anything original to the table besides better quality (but not perfect) cinematography When the carnage begins, the lighting gets very dark and sometimes obscures the shots and detail which may be a creative choice but does somewhat reduce the enjoyment
Overall, very decent but not a game changer Worth watching.
An interesting slow burn, but without enough to make it stand against the countless other slasher films, X is a fine film and another tribute to the iconic genre that made horror so popular in the first place. Granted, I do enjoy myself a slasher film from time to time- I'm quite fond of films like Nightmare on Elm Street and My Bloody Valentine, but where X faults among the others is through using a rather familiar formula without any true unique purpose. Throughout the film the characters often talk about an X factor, something that makes Mia Goth's character special and starworthy- but unlike its mentionings- this film just doesn't have that. The acting is really good, I love the underrated Mia Goth as always- as well as Brittany Snow, Martin Henderson, and even Kid Cudi did a rather impressive job. The cinematography is fantastic and perfectly fits the amitpshere and tone the film is going for. The music is enjoyable and tense, and its pacing can be a bit slow at times, but does allow for an interesting point of view. Its main problem lies solely in its script, which revolves largely around a smut film production- but takes too many elements and formulaic tendencies from other horror films like Evil Dead, Friday the 13th, The Visit and most obviously Texas Chainsaw Massacre to really stand out on its own and become its own thing. In the end, its not a bad watch, I wouldn't watch it again, but I certainly didn't mind watching it. It isn't the most memorable, but I certainly don't have any disdain for it. It just could have been more, especially given the talent involved, but ironically it settled for less.
My Rating: 5.8/10.
My Rating: 5.8/10.
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाThe day after X (2022)'s South by Southwest premiere, writer/director Ti West revealed that during a mandatory two-week COVID-19 quarantine in his New Zealand hotel, before production could begin on this film, he wrote a prequel, Pearl (2022). A24 saw the script and greenlit the movie even before production on "X" had wrapped. He asked star Mia Goth if she wished to remain in New Zealand and film "Pearl," and she readily accepted. The prequel released later in 2022.
- गूफ़The film set in 1979 makes reference to missing persons ads on milk cartons. However, the first usage of milk cartons for missing persons was not until 1984.
- क्रेज़ी क्रेडिटThere are no opening credits. The title doesn't even appear on screen until the end.
- साउंडट्रैकAct Naturally
Performed by Loretta Lynn
Written by Vonie Morrison, Johnny Russell
Courtesy of Geffen Records under license from Universal Music Enterprises
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
- How long is X?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
विवरण
बॉक्स ऑफ़िस
- बजट
- $10,00,000(अनुमानित)
- US और कनाडा में सकल
- $1,17,69,469
- US और कनाडा में पहले सप्ताह में कुल कमाई
- $42,75,126
- 20 मार्च 2022
- दुनिया भर में सकल
- $1,47,45,049
- चलने की अवधि
- 1 घं 45 मि(105 min)
- रंग
- ध्वनि मिश्रण
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 1.90 : 1
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें