1950 के दशक के वेस्ट एंड में लंदन में, क्रू के एक महत्वपूर्ण सदस्य की हत्या के बाद एक स्मैश-हिट नाटक के मूवी संस्करण की योजना अचानक रुक जाती है.1950 के दशक के वेस्ट एंड में लंदन में, क्रू के एक महत्वपूर्ण सदस्य की हत्या के बाद एक स्मैश-हिट नाटक के मूवी संस्करण की योजना अचानक रुक जाती है.1950 के दशक के वेस्ट एंड में लंदन में, क्रू के एक महत्वपूर्ण सदस्य की हत्या के बाद एक स्मैश-हिट नाटक के मूवी संस्करण की योजना अचानक रुक जाती है.
- 1 BAFTA अवार्ड के लिए नामांकित
- 4 कुल नामांकन
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
I found this a really novel and almost throwback film with loads of great laughs and twists but never takes itself too seriously.
There is a really good cast with great characters, all bringing different things to the film. Having real life characters add something to the film as well.
I laughed a lot during the film with some of the characters and some of the jokes being very well done.
Its a reminder that there can be a great film made without the need for huge amounts of cgi, huge budgets and massive casts. This is just well written, well portrayed and with brilliant camera work, and just works really well.
There is a really good cast with great characters, all bringing different things to the film. Having real life characters add something to the film as well.
I laughed a lot during the film with some of the characters and some of the jokes being very well done.
Its a reminder that there can be a great film made without the need for huge amounts of cgi, huge budgets and massive casts. This is just well written, well portrayed and with brilliant camera work, and just works really well.
Q. When is too much split screen too much?
A. See How They Run.
I was so looking forward to this that i can't help feeling a tinge of disappointment. Towards the end of See How They Run, i was feeling almost nauseous with the use of split screen. It's every 5 minutes, and i'm not joking.
The movie thinks it's a lot cleverer than it is (telling us how the movie will end, the clever wink winks all the time). Some of the humour is great, mostly involving Saoirse Ronan who shows she's gifted in physical comedy and slapstick as well as everything else she puts her mind too.
The movie, for a whodunit, fails to fill the story with credible suspects and towards the end i had mostly lost interest in who the murderer was even going to be. Adrien Brody is great for the amount of screen time he receives but whenever he, Sam Rockwell or Saoirse aren't on screen, the movie drags.
Tom George's direction isn't the best and it makes me wonder what the film could look like if in better hands. Outside of the split screen issues, quick cuts are another constant but just makes me think of better directors and the lifting Tom George is taking from superior movies.
I went in to this hoping for another Knives Out but sadly this is nowhere near it.
A. See How They Run.
I was so looking forward to this that i can't help feeling a tinge of disappointment. Towards the end of See How They Run, i was feeling almost nauseous with the use of split screen. It's every 5 minutes, and i'm not joking.
The movie thinks it's a lot cleverer than it is (telling us how the movie will end, the clever wink winks all the time). Some of the humour is great, mostly involving Saoirse Ronan who shows she's gifted in physical comedy and slapstick as well as everything else she puts her mind too.
The movie, for a whodunit, fails to fill the story with credible suspects and towards the end i had mostly lost interest in who the murderer was even going to be. Adrien Brody is great for the amount of screen time he receives but whenever he, Sam Rockwell or Saoirse aren't on screen, the movie drags.
Tom George's direction isn't the best and it makes me wonder what the film could look like if in better hands. Outside of the split screen issues, quick cuts are another constant but just makes me think of better directors and the lifting Tom George is taking from superior movies.
I went in to this hoping for another Knives Out but sadly this is nowhere near it.
This is one of those films that people have rubbished purely because it's primary purpose is to entertain. And that's a great shame, because in these troubled times that's perhaps exactly what people want. A good night out at the cinema.
Saoirse Ronan again proves what a huge career she could go on to have, this time adding light comedy to her range of skills, in this murder mystery caper.
These are ten a penny right now, both on the big and small screen, but 'See How They Run' manages to find its own style, with some clever tricks up its sleeve throughout.
There are lots of big or recognisable faces dotted throughout this fun film, but the stand-outs are Ronan and Sam Rockwell as her superior. I'd actually be happy if this led to another outing for the pair.
Overall, good fun.
Saoirse Ronan again proves what a huge career she could go on to have, this time adding light comedy to her range of skills, in this murder mystery caper.
These are ten a penny right now, both on the big and small screen, but 'See How They Run' manages to find its own style, with some clever tricks up its sleeve throughout.
There are lots of big or recognisable faces dotted throughout this fun film, but the stand-outs are Ronan and Sam Rockwell as her superior. I'd actually be happy if this led to another outing for the pair.
Overall, good fun.
This movie had a great potential to be a better one.
It was exciting in the beginning and it kept me entertained as it progressed, till some events happened that were strongly related to the plot and did not make any sense to me. That was disappointing in addition to the movie's ending.
The acting of the main characters was not perfect but was not bad either. There was a lot of sarcastic comedy some throughout the movie of which made me laugh.
I am sad that my rating had to drop from 7 to 6 as I liked the movie but I wish if it was executed in a better way.
After all, it was a fun experience and I do not regret watching it. If you are looking for a silly movie with a mystery to solve, watch it.
It was exciting in the beginning and it kept me entertained as it progressed, till some events happened that were strongly related to the plot and did not make any sense to me. That was disappointing in addition to the movie's ending.
The acting of the main characters was not perfect but was not bad either. There was a lot of sarcastic comedy some throughout the movie of which made me laugh.
I am sad that my rating had to drop from 7 to 6 as I liked the movie but I wish if it was executed in a better way.
After all, it was a fun experience and I do not regret watching it. If you are looking for a silly movie with a mystery to solve, watch it.
I try to avoid trailers and promos so much so that I thought this was going to be a movie involving trains somehow like a biopic of whoever invented them, all I knew was Saoirse Ronan was in it. She was one of the few upbeat characters in it so she lit up the screen whenever she was on.
It's a movie that talks about itself throughout, it's a whodunnit film and as mentioned in the movie, once you see one you've seen them all. The plot of the movie is the plot of the theatre play and movie, that's inside the movie, so when a clue is revealed in one story you know it's the same for the other.
It's suspenseful throughout but not really engaging enough to keep you on your seat. You're not really invested in any of the characters unless you're already a fan of the actors playing them, which I was. I've seen it compared to "knives out" but I don't think it's that good. Nothing really special about it because it just doesn't click, feels like it's supposed to though. There's a lot of funny bits that carry the film, but those feel like an accessory, not actually what the movie is supposed to be about, just something to elevate it. It's meant to be a mystery but the mystery doesn't do much.
It's made to be pretty simple and quirky, I think it would've been better if it took itself a little more seriously and maybe slowed down a bit. Funny and 1950's retro so there's things to love about it, but confused about what's it's meant to be so it feels all over the place.
It's a movie that talks about itself throughout, it's a whodunnit film and as mentioned in the movie, once you see one you've seen them all. The plot of the movie is the plot of the theatre play and movie, that's inside the movie, so when a clue is revealed in one story you know it's the same for the other.
It's suspenseful throughout but not really engaging enough to keep you on your seat. You're not really invested in any of the characters unless you're already a fan of the actors playing them, which I was. I've seen it compared to "knives out" but I don't think it's that good. Nothing really special about it because it just doesn't click, feels like it's supposed to though. There's a lot of funny bits that carry the film, but those feel like an accessory, not actually what the movie is supposed to be about, just something to elevate it. It's meant to be a mystery but the mystery doesn't do much.
It's made to be pretty simple and quirky, I think it would've been better if it took itself a little more seriously and maybe slowed down a bit. Funny and 1950's retro so there's things to love about it, but confused about what's it's meant to be so it feels all over the place.
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाRichard "Dickie" Attenborough greets the detectives as "Darling." This was a real-life quirk of Attenborough's which he admitted he would often use if he forgot someone's name.
- गूफ़At the end, Inspector Stoppard is awarded the King's Medal for police etc. This movie is set in 1953; while Queen Elizabeth ascended to the throne in February 1952, the name of the King's Medals were not changed to Queen's Medals until May 1954, so it is accurate that the award Stoppard received would be called "King's."
- भाव
Max Mallowan: Better make that eight for dinner, Fellowes, and let Agatha know.
Fellowes: Yes, sir.
Max Mallowan: And get a shovel to clear the path.
Fellowes: Yes, sir.
Max Mallowan: And do we have enough coal?
Fellowes: Yes, sir. Three bags full, sir.
- कनेक्शनFeatured in 2023 EE BAFTA Film Awards (2023)
- साउंडट्रैकPrendi, Prendi, Per me sei libero
From the opera "L'Elisir d'Amore"
Written by Gaetano Donizetti
Performed by Magyar Állami Operaház Énekkara és Zenekara (as Hungarian State Opera Chorus and Orchestra)
Conducted by Pier Giorgio Morandi
Courtesy of Naxos
By arrangement with Source/Q
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
- How long is See How They Run?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
विवरण
- रिलीज़ की तारीख़
- कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
- आधिकारिक साइट
- भाषाएं
- इस रूप में भी जाना जाता है
- Mira cómo corren
- फ़िल्माने की जगहें
- Freemasons' Hall, 60 Great Queen Street, Covent Garden, Westminster, Greater London, इंग्लैंड, यूनाइटेड किंगडम(The Ambassadors Theatre, bar)
- उत्पादन कंपनियां
- IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें
बॉक्स ऑफ़िस
- बजट
- $4,00,00,000(अनुमानित)
- US और कनाडा में सकल
- $95,86,237
- US और कनाडा में पहले सप्ताह में कुल कमाई
- $30,07,657
- 18 सित॰ 2022
- दुनिया भर में सकल
- $2,19,66,634
- चलने की अवधि
- 1 घं 38 मि(98 min)
- रंग
- ध्वनि मिश्रण
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 1.85 : 1
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें