Mumbaikar

In addition to the technical aspects, the movie itself was a bit dull and disconnected. The storyline failed to establish a strong connection between the characters, resulting in a lack of chemistry among the artists. However, the movie managed to capture its message effectively in the last 10 minutes. It beautifully portrayed the essence of Mumbai, where people selflessly help one another, regardless of their names or relationships. Conversely, they also unknowingly form enemies without any real reason. The film depicted a city where everyone is constantly on the move, yet they manage to form complex relationships, exhibit acts of humanity, and even cultivate enmity, all without knowing each other's names.

A simple word short review - by - itsbymayank Mayank Louteriya

Firstly it's a mix of individuals Mumbaikar's story.

All the characters have done a good work.

Director have to be like this, he can work in any genre.

A simple one time watch good movie.

A actual life of Mumbai people with some masala in it.

There is a song but in background that's the best thing I believe because makers didn't want to make movie Lengthy.

Unnecessarily makers didn't make it Lengthy and didn't put anything anytime.

Every part and scene is OK and set there.

If you don't know about the makers of the film just go and search it.

To be honest I Mayank Louteriya - Select films not because of only actors but makers..

Thanks - go watch it once.. Review of Mumbaikar by itsbymayank.

Really nice and cool movie, I don't know why this movie is getting so low rating, there is no porn scene, we can watch this movie with family, the ending is so beautiful, the actors played their role very well. Yet people are giving such low ratings, people are used to watching only pornographic relationships so such a beautiful movie is getting such low ratings.. Sachin Khedekar, Vikrant Massey, Vijay Sethupathi, Ranveer Shorey, Sanjay Mishra, Hridh Haroon, Tanya Manikatala have all done an amazing job.

But anyway I like the movie very much and I request the director to make the movie... All the best.

Sameer lodaya

The movie is wrongly based and titled as mumbaikar as no instances shown occurs in mumbai

The main content is said to be inspired by some south movie but the title of mumbaikar and the city which is described is absolutely not mumbai..there spirit of mumbai is very high and positive the elements shown like acid attack ,kidnapping,looting,etc happens very less in mumbai ..more of negativity shown rather than good qualities of mumbai..unnecessary connections were developed and showcased

Only Vijay was good in the movie in compare to all big stars

This is not expected from great Santosh sivan.

This was so soulless, and Vijay Sethupathi role did not suit him in Tamil Maanagaram Munishkanth, Nailed that role, being a person who is totally silly and innocent and it did not suit Vijay Sethupathis personality, over a massive soulless movie that should have not been made. Lokesh K's first movie, and impressed the audience with his style of storytelling, and the issue with Mumbaikar is that it was just a copy-paste without the right emotions. As a big fan of Vijay Sethupathis, I just wish his entry to Hindi film should have been with some great role, and not with this role. I think as the rule goes leave the original as original and don't mess with it.