IMDb रेटिंग
4.5/10
6 हज़ार
आपकी रेटिंग
कॉलेज के दोस्तों का एक समूह पार्टी के सप्ताहांत के लिए एक स्मार्ट घर किराए पर लेता है. द में, उन्हें एहसास होने लगता है कि घर के सुपर एडवांस्ड एआई सिस्टम मार्गॉक्स में उनके लिए भयावह डिजाइन ... सभी पढ़ेंकॉलेज के दोस्तों का एक समूह पार्टी के सप्ताहांत के लिए एक स्मार्ट घर किराए पर लेता है. द में, उन्हें एहसास होने लगता है कि घर के सुपर एडवांस्ड एआई सिस्टम मार्गॉक्स में उनके लिए भयावह डिजाइन हैं.कॉलेज के दोस्तों का एक समूह पार्टी के सप्ताहांत के लिए एक स्मार्ट घर किराए पर लेता है. द में, उन्हें एहसास होने लगता है कि घर के सुपर एडवांस्ड एआई सिस्टम मार्गॉक्स में उनके लिए भयावह डिजाइन हैं.
- पुरस्कार
- 3 कुल नामांकन
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
This would have been better if they didn't include CGI/VFX robot arms and white liquid. It would have made the movie more realistic and more fun to watch. With the ridiculous robot arms it was just distracting because they were just poorly done and made the whole thing seem silly instead of funny.
The characters also didn't even react much to freaking CLONES in front of them at the beginning of the movie. How can you just dismiss that and continue partying? I know some of them were stoned, but not all of them. They just giggled and continued talking like nothing fantastic happened. I know it's supposed to be a horror-comedy movie, but they should have put a bit more effort to make it less ridiculous.
The characters also didn't even react much to freaking CLONES in front of them at the beginning of the movie. How can you just dismiss that and continue partying? I know some of them were stoned, but not all of them. They just giggled and continued talking like nothing fantastic happened. I know it's supposed to be a horror-comedy movie, but they should have put a bit more effort to make it less ridiculous.
A litany of putrefied cinematic sins, sloppily contained in a thin polymer skin:
Lawnmower man eat your heart out (this filmgives instructions).
- Inane story
- Cardboard acting
- Self indulgent slo-mo interstitial sequence
- Infuriating dialogue
- Terrible effects
- Anachronistic technology with no explanation
- Strange scoring choices
- Deranged casting/geriatric 20-somethings
- Technobabble
- Non-existent cast chemistry
- Molecule-thin disposable stereotyped characters
- Redundant plot devices
- Inconsistent character behaviours
- Painfully unrewarding predictability
- Trying sooo hard for that 'R', not deserving it
Lawnmower man eat your heart out (this filmgives instructions).
As I had the opportunity to watch the 2022 horror / thriller "Margaux", of course I opted to do so. Sure, I had not even heard about this movie from writers Chris Beyrooty, Chris Sivertson and Nick Waters prior to watching it. But I found the synopsis to be alluring.
And now having watched it, I have to say that this movie was definitely unique. Yeah, there were parts of the storyline and script that had appeal, and the movie was watchable enough for what it turned out to be. But if you step back and look at the things that goes on throughout the movie objectively, then it just makes zero sense and the whole concept is actually not a great thing. But hey, the movie made for a semi-adequate viewing experience, so there was that.
So many things that happened throughout the movie were ludicrous, and why would someone create a house with the ability to kill people, or even have a ceiling that can slide all the way down to the floor? And so many other things just didn't make any logical sense if you think about it.
The acting in the movie was fairly good, taking into consideration the limitations imposed by the script. It was a relatively small cast ensemble, so the actors and actresses had to perform all the more convincingly to carry the movie. And they did that well enough. I was only familiar with actors Richard Harmon and Lochlyn Munro.
Visually then "Margaux" was enjoyable enough. The special effects in the movie were good and helped to distract from the ludicrous concept holes of the storyline.
"Margaux" is the type of movie that you watch once, then shelf it and never return to it a second time.
My rating of director Steven C. Miller's 2022 movie "Margaux" lands on a bland five out of ten stars.
And now having watched it, I have to say that this movie was definitely unique. Yeah, there were parts of the storyline and script that had appeal, and the movie was watchable enough for what it turned out to be. But if you step back and look at the things that goes on throughout the movie objectively, then it just makes zero sense and the whole concept is actually not a great thing. But hey, the movie made for a semi-adequate viewing experience, so there was that.
So many things that happened throughout the movie were ludicrous, and why would someone create a house with the ability to kill people, or even have a ceiling that can slide all the way down to the floor? And so many other things just didn't make any logical sense if you think about it.
The acting in the movie was fairly good, taking into consideration the limitations imposed by the script. It was a relatively small cast ensemble, so the actors and actresses had to perform all the more convincingly to carry the movie. And they did that well enough. I was only familiar with actors Richard Harmon and Lochlyn Munro.
Visually then "Margaux" was enjoyable enough. The special effects in the movie were good and helped to distract from the ludicrous concept holes of the storyline.
"Margaux" is the type of movie that you watch once, then shelf it and never return to it a second time.
My rating of director Steven C. Miller's 2022 movie "Margaux" lands on a bland five out of ten stars.
Not Terrible, but not great either. The concept is interesting and the production is pretty good, some of the effects weren't great but they were passable. The acting for the most part was decent.
This film feels like a dress rehearsal of the movie, it has all the right elements and you get the idea and feel for it but it's just not quite all there.
The kills, again, are respectable but it doesn't quite hit the spot.
It's not amateurish but it's not quite big league. There are a lot of horror movies that are bad, this isn't one of them but again, it's not great. It's not scary but it could've been, it has the all elements but misses the mark. Watch it but don't expect much from it.
This film feels like a dress rehearsal of the movie, it has all the right elements and you get the idea and feel for it but it's just not quite all there.
The kills, again, are respectable but it doesn't quite hit the spot.
It's not amateurish but it's not quite big league. There are a lot of horror movies that are bad, this isn't one of them but again, it's not great. It's not scary but it could've been, it has the all elements but misses the mark. Watch it but don't expect much from it.
This is a very comfortable movie for those who enjoyed the commercial resurgence of horror in the 90s and early noughties.
The opening scenes are very reminiscent of Kevin Williamson's I Know What You Did Last Summer and Drew Goddard's Cabin in the Woods, with a definitive nod to the original Scream at the very beginning.
Pretty people of various stereotypes gather before Spring Break to hit a surprise location. It's all pretty cookie cutter but that doesn't make it any less enjoyable.
The thrills are real and deaths are unique, given the antagonist is a house (no spoiler here; that's in the preview).
There are some forgivable timing issues but the BIG lost opportunity here was to expand on what was found in the mainframe. I sincerely felt that that was the right time to delve into the origin story of Margaux and build to a more worthy conclusion.
All in all though, a worthwhile effort for what it was meant to be. Very decent 6/10
#31DaysOfHalloween2022.
The opening scenes are very reminiscent of Kevin Williamson's I Know What You Did Last Summer and Drew Goddard's Cabin in the Woods, with a definitive nod to the original Scream at the very beginning.
Pretty people of various stereotypes gather before Spring Break to hit a surprise location. It's all pretty cookie cutter but that doesn't make it any less enjoyable.
The thrills are real and deaths are unique, given the antagonist is a house (no spoiler here; that's in the preview).
There are some forgivable timing issues but the BIG lost opportunity here was to expand on what was found in the mainframe. I sincerely felt that that was the right time to delve into the origin story of Margaux and build to a more worthy conclusion.
All in all though, a worthwhile effort for what it was meant to be. Very decent 6/10
#31DaysOfHalloween2022.
क्या आपको पता है
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
- How long is Margaux?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
विवरण
- रिलीज़ की तारीख़
- कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
- आधिकारिक साइटें
- भाषा
- इस रूप में भी जाना जाता है
- 驚魂派對
- फ़िल्माने की जगहें
- उत्पादन कंपनियां
- IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें
- चलने की अवधि1 घंटा 44 मिनट
- रंग
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 2.39:1
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें