#Unknown

Wel I'm not sure how this movie has a rating of 6.3. It was that rating that made me choose to watch it. To be fair it should be a 3.5. More like a b movie. And certainly not anywhere near a six. I'm guessing the last person knows the people that made this middle of the night tv b movie. The acting is ok I guess. I felt like I was waiting for something to happen. It's like the film keeps going like a broken old car engine. Really, it's just not very good. It's a poor attempt at horror. While the acting isn't awful. It isn't good either. I'm still here still waiting for it to get better.

Honest advice. Don't waste your time. You'll be sorely disappointed. The lady in it reminds me of some comedy film. Her expressions jsut don't go with the scenes. And the guy. Well he just gets angry for no reason. The "jump" scenes are just poor. It's a really bad attempt at a horror movie. Writer has block. Then gets haunted by ghosts of murder victims so he's out to solve the crime because the police closed the case and aren't interested. Oh m geee.

It just doesn't make sense at all. I was generous giving it a 3.5.

And I really did try to give it a chance.

I really don't understand the crazy plot. Maybe you'll do better if you, like me are brain dead and bored enough to sit through it.

Poor poor poor

Disappointed in IMDB fir allowing this one to slip through with such a false high rating. It's utter Tosh.

So the lead is battling his addiction (alcohol) with his new wife. He struggles with writing a new novel after great success with his first, written when he drank. Then, he starts to be plagued by intrusive phone calls and the sense of harrassment increases, interfering with their sleep, security in their home, and the lead's mental stability. This brings questions his sanity or maybe it's ghost! This leads to a serial killer! Everything is slow steps with questionable motivations for the lead and his behavior. Acting is passable, but with poor characterization and standard plotting with obvious twists, #unkown needs to remain that way, unknown.

This movie had so much potential. I can say honestly the acting is decent, but I expect so much more from Judd Nelson. He seemed bored in this movie. I love when he goes full method and kind of over acts. I suppose those days are over. I still love him as an actor. The movie was a good watch and I enjoyed it although I was hoping for more mystery and at least one good jump scare. I got nothing. I wonder was this suppose to be a thriller and not horror? The movie was hardly scary, it was suspenseful and the pacing was well. I wish the plot and storyline were not so predictable. I was able to predict the ending in the first 20 minutes.

It was a very interesting and unique kind of horror movie. You won't be disappointed!

Lets just say, I did not like this childlish screen play. Guy writes book, I guess some people buy it. So he is writing book number two about a KNIGHT, first featured in book number one. Really? When were knights in shining armor movies the latest thing? I guess in my 76 years, I forgot. Obviously, writer has drinking issues. When was the last time I saw a movie about a writer with dinking problems? That has been done ad infinitum. It will come to no surprise that I decided to stop watching after the woman said I want to have a baby for the upteen time to a former (yeah, right) drunk writer, with zero imagination. I say more but I may get lucky and guess the right conclusion. (I know of at least three movies with that same name.)