अटलांटा के एक रियल एस्टेट मुगल का अनुसरण करता है क्योंकि उसे अचानक दिवालियापन का सामना करना पड़ता है, और अपने साम्राज्य को उन लोगों से बचाने की कोशिश करता है जो उसके अनुग्रह से गिरने का फायद... सभी पढ़ेंअटलांटा के एक रियल एस्टेट मुगल का अनुसरण करता है क्योंकि उसे अचानक दिवालियापन का सामना करना पड़ता है, और अपने साम्राज्य को उन लोगों से बचाने की कोशिश करता है जो उसके अनुग्रह से गिरने का फायदा उठाने की कोशिश कर रहे हैं.अटलांटा के एक रियल एस्टेट मुगल का अनुसरण करता है क्योंकि उसे अचानक दिवालियापन का सामना करना पड़ता है, और अपने साम्राज्य को उन लोगों से बचाने की कोशिश करता है जो उसके अनुग्रह से गिरने का फायदा उठाने की कोशिश कर रहे हैं.
- पुरस्कार
- कुल 1 जीत
एपिसोड ब्राउज़ करें
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
The series builds up the story and characters pretty good. As tensions rise it's hard to know on which side you stand.
Acting by Jeff Daniels is superb.
And Tom Pelphery manages to make you see his POV and hate him at the same time.
I was just about to say what a great series it was, when the last episode ruined the whole series for me.
Not only was it 100% Deusex Machina but the last 10 minutes was a crude amateur-like attempt to surprise the watcher with an end twist.
It almost felt as if the last episode and specially the last 10 minutes of the series were written by a different person or team, one without experience.
Unlike excellent twists such as in The Usual Suspects or in Fight Club, this "twist" was so unlikely and ridiculous it not only fails to surprise but mocks the development.
I was so unimpressed and angered by the ending that the last 10 minutes de series went from a solid 9 to a 5. From a "you guys have to watch this!" to a "don't even bother".
Such a pity that the great acting and initial story was ruined by the last episode.
Acting by Jeff Daniels is superb.
And Tom Pelphery manages to make you see his POV and hate him at the same time.
I was just about to say what a great series it was, when the last episode ruined the whole series for me.
Not only was it 100% Deusex Machina but the last 10 minutes was a crude amateur-like attempt to surprise the watcher with an end twist.
It almost felt as if the last episode and specially the last 10 minutes of the series were written by a different person or team, one without experience.
Unlike excellent twists such as in The Usual Suspects or in Fight Club, this "twist" was so unlikely and ridiculous it not only fails to surprise but mocks the development.
I was so unimpressed and angered by the ending that the last 10 minutes de series went from a solid 9 to a 5. From a "you guys have to watch this!" to a "don't even bother".
Such a pity that the great acting and initial story was ruined by the last episode.
Charlie Croker sits at the top of his business empire, but it's crumbling, debts are being called in, and the vultures circle. In a position of relative weakness, Charlie is played by those in power.
This series has gained notoriety, mainly for a flash in episode six, but there's been a lot of positive chat, and for the most part, it's a decent series.
Episodes one and two build up Charlie as this huge, divisive, charismatic figure, Jeff Daniels plays him perfectly, but as the series develops, the focus comes away from him, and the story meanders somewhat.
Conrad's story takes over, and comes out of nowhere, it really does detract from Charlie's story.
It's watchable enough, I had just hoped for so much more, without the powerhouse performance form Jeff Daniels, I think it would have fallen flat.
Perhaps I should have read the book.
6/10.
This series has gained notoriety, mainly for a flash in episode six, but there's been a lot of positive chat, and for the most part, it's a decent series.
Episodes one and two build up Charlie as this huge, divisive, charismatic figure, Jeff Daniels plays him perfectly, but as the series develops, the focus comes away from him, and the story meanders somewhat.
Conrad's story takes over, and comes out of nowhere, it really does detract from Charlie's story.
It's watchable enough, I had just hoped for so much more, without the powerhouse performance form Jeff Daniels, I think it would have fallen flat.
Perhaps I should have read the book.
6/10.
I read the novel when it came out in the mid '90s and enjoyed it very much. This series took a 700something page book and tried to shoehorn it into six 45minute episodes. The result seems disjointed and basically just incomplete. The first episode opens as if it assumes no character development is needed; that all of the viewers are already aqcuainted with the players and how they came to be who we now see. The novel has several sub-plots that intertwine well throughout, but this Netflix series offers us only two which really seem to have little connection with the other, other than some characters moving back and forth between them. My take is the series was budgeted much to small to spend the time and money to do Tom Wolfe's novel the justice it deserves.
Once again we have a case of 'the book is better than the film/miniseries'.
I've read the book twice, and believe me, the book is better than this 6 episodes series.
My biggest critique about the mini series is that the dialogues are really poor, and of little substance. And thus not believable. Short scenes with few information are put behind each other. This also means that we don't get much to know about the main protagonists, nor about how Charlie Croker ended up in such financial perils.
It is strange to see that a man so affluent as Charlie Croker has not many staff members (1 attorney, 1 secretary and 1 accountant). It is strange to see when he shows up at decisive meetings he doesn't have a lot to say, but huff and bluff and puff. Same goes for the bank accountants too actually. Their case is not well built up. These business scenes don't come across as very believable. It all feels a bit grotesque, cartoonesque... The best episode is the last episode, in which there is a long court scene in which the attorney brings a strong plea for justice, and later a memorable speech of Charlie in Georgia Tech Stadium. There should have been more scenes like this. Maybe my expectiations were a bit too high, but I was a bit dissapointed all in all.
I've read the book twice, and believe me, the book is better than this 6 episodes series.
My biggest critique about the mini series is that the dialogues are really poor, and of little substance. And thus not believable. Short scenes with few information are put behind each other. This also means that we don't get much to know about the main protagonists, nor about how Charlie Croker ended up in such financial perils.
It is strange to see that a man so affluent as Charlie Croker has not many staff members (1 attorney, 1 secretary and 1 accountant). It is strange to see when he shows up at decisive meetings he doesn't have a lot to say, but huff and bluff and puff. Same goes for the bank accountants too actually. Their case is not well built up. These business scenes don't come across as very believable. It all feels a bit grotesque, cartoonesque... The best episode is the last episode, in which there is a long court scene in which the attorney brings a strong plea for justice, and later a memorable speech of Charlie in Georgia Tech Stadium. There should have been more scenes like this. Maybe my expectiations were a bit too high, but I was a bit dissapointed all in all.
It was interesting to note the script for this new limited series was written by David E. Kelley, the guy responsible or who'd participated in so many series over the years. A lot were vanilla but all very watchable.
This one was very watchable, and thankfully no messing around with incremental releasing of episodes, so we're able to binge the whole thing now if we wish. My style for sure.
It's not as representative of the "underbelly" of political goings on in Atlanta as I'd had hoped, or America for that matter. It sort of forgot about itself on the way and ended up too vanilla. And it then has an ending. Which is good. Most series don't.
Most importantly, I did appreciate some of the unmistakable nods to the current political situation in the USA in very small ways which hit the mark and made me smile each time. When you watch, or if you've seen it, you'll know what I mean. Funny. I hope there's more of this type of thing coming on films soon. We need more humour.
This one was very watchable, and thankfully no messing around with incremental releasing of episodes, so we're able to binge the whole thing now if we wish. My style for sure.
It's not as representative of the "underbelly" of political goings on in Atlanta as I'd had hoped, or America for that matter. It sort of forgot about itself on the way and ended up too vanilla. And it then has an ending. Which is good. Most series don't.
Most importantly, I did appreciate some of the unmistakable nods to the current political situation in the USA in very small ways which hit the mark and made me smile each time. When you watch, or if you've seen it, you'll know what I mean. Funny. I hope there's more of this type of thing coming on films soon. We need more humour.
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाCharlie Croker was Michael Caine's character's name in The Italian Job.
- क्रेज़ी क्रेडिटThe title card, 'A MAN IN FULL', gradually crumbles as the series progresses.
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
- How many seasons does A Man in Full have?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
विवरण
- रिलीज़ की तारीख़
- कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
- आधिकारिक साइट
- भाषा
- इस रूप में भी जाना जाता है
- Справжній чоловік
- फ़िल्माने की जगहें
- उत्पादन कंपनियां
- IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें
- चलने की अवधि
- 45 मि
- रंग
- ध्वनि मिश्रण
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 16:9 HD
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें