तीन खिलाड़ी जो किशोरावस्था के दौरान एक-दूसरे को जानते थे, वह विश्व प्रसिद्ध ग्रैंड स्लैम विजेता बनने के लिए एक टेनिस टूर्नामेंट में भाग लेते हैं.तीन खिलाड़ी जो किशोरावस्था के दौरान एक-दूसरे को जानते थे, वह विश्व प्रसिद्ध ग्रैंड स्लैम विजेता बनने के लिए एक टेनिस टूर्नामेंट में भाग लेते हैं.तीन खिलाड़ी जो किशोरावस्था के दौरान एक-दूसरे को जानते थे, वह विश्व प्रसिद्ध ग्रैंड स्लैम विजेता बनने के लिए एक टेनिस टूर्नामेंट में भाग लेते हैं.
- पुरस्कार
- 74 जीत और कुल 151 नामांकन
Shane T Harris
- Art's Security Guard
- (as a different name)
A.J. Lister
- Lily
- (as AJ Lister)
सारांश
Reviewers say 'Challengers' is a visually striking film with intense performances by Zendaya, Mike Faist, and Josh O'Connor. Its non-linear narrative and use of tennis as a metaphor for personal struggles are noted. The cinematography and soundtrack by Trent Reznor and Atticus Ross are praised, though some find the script lacking and characters underdeveloped. The ambiguous ending sparks debate, with mixed reactions to its narrative and character development.
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
This was my first Luca Guadagnino film, so I'm not sure if any of these criticisms can be explained by "it's just his style" but who knows. The trailer makes the movie look fun, and while there are humorous moments, these are few and far between.
We have two young tennis players - one successful and the other is not for various reasons - both in love with the same woman who seems to jump between them in what makes for a complicated love triangle. Add in electronic music played loudly over scenes where not much is happening, gratuitous nudity (so many penises), and neverending slo-motion in an overlong running time and you have Challengers.
I liked Zendaya when she was playing the role of mature mother and retired tennis professional, but she all too easily slips into an angsty teen who feels too young to play the character.
My favourite moments were the two male leads just hanging out (they had more chemistry than Zendaya with either one), but I wasn't exactly sure what the seemingly homoerotic moments added to the story.
Despite the above points, this movie held my interest and had me wondering exactly where it was going. When it landed, however, I felt cheated of 2 hours by watching a movie that thought it was smarter than it really was. Severely lacking payoff.
We have two young tennis players - one successful and the other is not for various reasons - both in love with the same woman who seems to jump between them in what makes for a complicated love triangle. Add in electronic music played loudly over scenes where not much is happening, gratuitous nudity (so many penises), and neverending slo-motion in an overlong running time and you have Challengers.
I liked Zendaya when she was playing the role of mature mother and retired tennis professional, but she all too easily slips into an angsty teen who feels too young to play the character.
My favourite moments were the two male leads just hanging out (they had more chemistry than Zendaya with either one), but I wasn't exactly sure what the seemingly homoerotic moments added to the story.
Despite the above points, this movie held my interest and had me wondering exactly where it was going. When it landed, however, I felt cheated of 2 hours by watching a movie that thought it was smarter than it really was. Severely lacking payoff.
I went to see this yesterday although it was not my choice.
I tried to disregard that tennis mostly bores me.
Usually perceptive, but I did not get the point of the film.
A love triangle spanning 13 years with Zendaya as the master manipulator. What was she doing? Making the chaps better tennis players, making them grow up, making them aware that their long time friendship was more than just that. I do not know and then you ask yourself, why?
On the plus side, Josh O'Connor was mesmerising, turning in a good performance. The music was good, if on occasion a tad overdramatic for the scene being played out. Some titters.
On the minus side, the tennis montages grew tedious, the time jumps a little too often, particularly towards the end of the film.
There was one scene in a locker room, where I could not understand a word that was being said, I thought it was not in English, but I could not understand the gist or the purpose. Very frustrating.
The film was too long (I saw people leave) and, dare I say it, a little pointless.
I tried to disregard that tennis mostly bores me.
Usually perceptive, but I did not get the point of the film.
A love triangle spanning 13 years with Zendaya as the master manipulator. What was she doing? Making the chaps better tennis players, making them grow up, making them aware that their long time friendship was more than just that. I do not know and then you ask yourself, why?
On the plus side, Josh O'Connor was mesmerising, turning in a good performance. The music was good, if on occasion a tad overdramatic for the scene being played out. Some titters.
On the minus side, the tennis montages grew tedious, the time jumps a little too often, particularly towards the end of the film.
There was one scene in a locker room, where I could not understand a word that was being said, I thought it was not in English, but I could not understand the gist or the purpose. Very frustrating.
The film was too long (I saw people leave) and, dare I say it, a little pointless.
I had very high expectations for this movie to come out and planned weeks in advance to see it. Perhaps that was unfair to factor in for my rating, but overall it missed the mark.
I had trouble following the timelines of certain scenes and felt confused throughout. Also, the movie basically has only three characters that have any role of significance which I felt was odd. Perhaps the umpire would be considered the fourth character that you see and he has a very small part.
I thought Zendaya was brilliant, but I didn't particularly like her character or the two competitors. There was nobody that you wanted to root for. For a tennis movie, rather go for Wimbledon than this one unfortunately.
I had trouble following the timelines of certain scenes and felt confused throughout. Also, the movie basically has only three characters that have any role of significance which I felt was odd. Perhaps the umpire would be considered the fourth character that you see and he has a very small part.
I thought Zendaya was brilliant, but I didn't particularly like her character or the two competitors. There was nobody that you wanted to root for. For a tennis movie, rather go for Wimbledon than this one unfortunately.
The only reason I went to see this movie was to see if Zendaya could hang with the big dogs. To see if she can carry a film all by herself. She has the talent, she has the looks. She has it all. I think this movie is a good start to launch her career as a bonfide movie star. That being said, the movie itself was okay. Just okay. Not great, not bad but okay. I thought Zendaya was good. Her performance was something I expected, which I guess is a good thing. Didn't blow me out of the water but overall good. The actor who played Patrick, in my opinion did a great job. However everything else about this movie just fell short for me. Too much style and not enough substance.
This is a tough one. I liked the concept and the overall story. However i feel like it missed the mark on occasions.
The acting was decent. Felt like each character was built upon chemistry and realism. It kept me entertained for the most part.
The times jumps at the beginning worked and created suspense. Leaving the viewer unsure of what the history our 3 characters share however, the time jumps became a bit too rapid and i personally found it harder to keep up with where we are in the story. I feel like they could've left out a few scenes to make the story flow smoother.
The soundtrack was interesting. Not sure if it suited the mood of the film. But my biggest gripe is the ridiculously slowed down ending. Not sure what the director was thinking with that one.
The conclusion felt like it was going on for 1 hour and i felt it a little cheesy with the last scene of the film.
Overall I see a lot of influence from the film "Match Point" starring Scarlet Johansson. In my opinion that film was far more successful in what "challengers" was attempting.
Overall, bit hit and miss. Some decent moments but nothing to get you excited about or talk about after.
The acting was decent. Felt like each character was built upon chemistry and realism. It kept me entertained for the most part.
The times jumps at the beginning worked and created suspense. Leaving the viewer unsure of what the history our 3 characters share however, the time jumps became a bit too rapid and i personally found it harder to keep up with where we are in the story. I feel like they could've left out a few scenes to make the story flow smoother.
The soundtrack was interesting. Not sure if it suited the mood of the film. But my biggest gripe is the ridiculously slowed down ending. Not sure what the director was thinking with that one.
The conclusion felt like it was going on for 1 hour and i felt it a little cheesy with the last scene of the film.
Overall I see a lot of influence from the film "Match Point" starring Scarlet Johansson. In my opinion that film was far more successful in what "challengers" was attempting.
Overall, bit hit and miss. Some decent moments but nothing to get you excited about or talk about after.
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाPatrick taking a bite of the churro and letting Art take one was unscripted. Josh O'Connor was starving and it was the first time he ever had churros.
- गूफ़After Patrick loses the second set in his final round match against Art and smashes his racket, the chair umpire declares a code violation point penalty; however, it should have been a game penalty, as Patrick had already received a point penalty earlier in the match (the scoreboard at the bottom accurately reflects the correct score).
- भाव
Tashi Donaldson: [after Patrick notices her engagement ring] It was his grandmother's.
Patrick Zweig: How is she?
Tashi Donaldson: She died. Stroke.
- क्रेज़ी क्रेडिटOn the United States release of the film, the MGM logo appears after the brief opening prologue, and the roar of studio mascot, Leo the Lion, is silenced.
- कनेक्शनFeatured in The 7PM Project: 26 मार्च 2024 को प्रसारित एपिसोड (2024)
- साउंडट्रैकSound the Trumpet
Written by Henry Purcell
Performed by The Toronto Children's Chorus
Courtesy of Marquis Classics
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
- How long is Challengers?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
विवरण
- रिलीज़ की तारीख़
- कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
- आधिकारिक साइटें
- भाषाएं
- इस रूप में भी जाना जाता है
- Desafiantes
- फ़िल्माने की जगहें
- उत्पादन कंपनियां
- IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें
बॉक्स ऑफ़िस
- बजट
- $5,50,00,000(अनुमानित)
- US और कनाडा में सकल
- $5,01,19,408
- US और कनाडा में पहले सप्ताह में कुल कमाई
- $1,50,11,061
- 28 अप्रैल 2024
- दुनिया भर में सकल
- $9,61,19,408
- चलने की अवधि2 घंटे 11 मिनट
- रंग
- ध्वनि मिश्रण
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 1.85 : 1
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें