Seize Them!
- 2024
- 1 घं 31 मि
IMDb रेटिंग
5.1/10
1.3 हज़ार
आपकी रेटिंग
अपनी भाषा में प्लॉट जोड़ेंDark Ages Britain where Queen Dagan is toppled by a revolution led by Humble Joan. The Queen becomes a fugitive in her own land, and must face hardship and danger as she embarks on a voyage ... सभी पढ़ेंDark Ages Britain where Queen Dagan is toppled by a revolution led by Humble Joan. The Queen becomes a fugitive in her own land, and must face hardship and danger as she embarks on a voyage to win back her throne.Dark Ages Britain where Queen Dagan is toppled by a revolution led by Humble Joan. The Queen becomes a fugitive in her own land, and must face hardship and danger as she embarks on a voyage to win back her throne.
- पुरस्कार
- कुल 1 नामांकन
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
Billed as a comedy , this fell flat from start to finish , you could count the laughs on one finger .
Such a shame with stars such as Nick Frost & Jessica Hynes of Spaced & Shaun of the dead fame
It had the low budget feeling of horrible history but lacked the comic genius
It's really difficult to find anything positive to say about this except that it's good to see an English film make a cinema appearance but I doubt if this will last til week 2
147 characters to fill so not sure what else I can say except that it's really not worth seeing especially if you pay for it , such a shame
New paragraph from the next day & still wondering what did I see ? I wish it had been as good as Horrible Histories as they get away with the low budget by making up with humour , it's been over 13 years since Gnomeo & Juliet which seemed ok but the laughs here were lacking
The casting was interesting and that in itself was similar to Brigerton by breaking the mould which is do often done in Shakespeare too & good to have two strong female lead characters & a number of mixed race roles which is refreshing , it's just sad it missed the comedy , I'd say it was a farce & not on a good way & relied far too much on bad language & taboo subjects such as excrement to tease out a laugh , the only funny scene & possibly a rare spoiler here was the disposing of one of the key witnesses which used repetitive action to capture a laugh but for the most part the audience was silent in the cinema where I saw it
I couldn't recommend this to anyone
Sorry cast & crew
Pad. A 3/10.
Such a shame with stars such as Nick Frost & Jessica Hynes of Spaced & Shaun of the dead fame
It had the low budget feeling of horrible history but lacked the comic genius
It's really difficult to find anything positive to say about this except that it's good to see an English film make a cinema appearance but I doubt if this will last til week 2
147 characters to fill so not sure what else I can say except that it's really not worth seeing especially if you pay for it , such a shame
New paragraph from the next day & still wondering what did I see ? I wish it had been as good as Horrible Histories as they get away with the low budget by making up with humour , it's been over 13 years since Gnomeo & Juliet which seemed ok but the laughs here were lacking
The casting was interesting and that in itself was similar to Brigerton by breaking the mould which is do often done in Shakespeare too & good to have two strong female lead characters & a number of mixed race roles which is refreshing , it's just sad it missed the comedy , I'd say it was a farce & not on a good way & relied far too much on bad language & taboo subjects such as excrement to tease out a laugh , the only funny scene & possibly a rare spoiler here was the disposing of one of the key witnesses which used repetitive action to capture a laugh but for the most part the audience was silent in the cinema where I saw it
I couldn't recommend this to anyone
Sorry cast & crew
Pad. A 3/10.
Why?
This would have been a fun film for youg (ish) kids, so why add swearing - there really was no need and it's not the sort of film that would appeal to an older audience - although, because of the swearing, it's rated 15. Having said that I laughed twice.
I can confirm that there was a plot, there was acting and, possibly, some direction. It felt like a prolonged TV sketch - put in the rack and tortured, until it was mistakenly let go.
I am mystified why this was released into cinemas - maybe to test its commercial viability, but as I was the only person in the cinema the answer to that is clear.
This would have been a fun film for youg (ish) kids, so why add swearing - there really was no need and it's not the sort of film that would appeal to an older audience - although, because of the swearing, it's rated 15. Having said that I laughed twice.
I can confirm that there was a plot, there was acting and, possibly, some direction. It felt like a prolonged TV sketch - put in the rack and tortured, until it was mistakenly let go.
I am mystified why this was released into cinemas - maybe to test its commercial viability, but as I was the only person in the cinema the answer to that is clear.
3GB65
When I see a comedy with the names Nick Frost and Jessica Hynes I think I'm in for a good time. Don't be fooled, this is a truly awful film which I gave three stars simply because of the aforementioned duo. Enough good actors to make this work but the script is shocking, the jokes don't work and some of the characters are stupid beyond belief (the Scandi Kings). As for the 'good actors'; Lolly Adefope didn't look interested -possibly realising once filming started what she'd let herself in for- Nicola Coughlan continues to baffle me, Aimee Lou Wood looked like she was trying to summon the spirit of Miranda Richardson's wonderful Queen Elizabeth in Blackadder II and failing miserably and the less said about Paul Kaye the better. I've never even been close to walking out of a film in a cinema I was so close today.
Take it for what it is.
It's silly, it has some funny jokes, it evolves at good pace, the story-line is only slightly bonkers, ...
You can see the budget was not big. But it doesn't need it.
It's well crafted and it keeps you entertained the whole time.
It doesn't drag, and you get a funny joke now and then. Only one or two laugh out loud ones, but plenty chuckles.
That's the kind of movie it is.
No idea why some people seem focused on trying to compare every movie to Citizen Kane.
They don't seem to understand that different movies have different purposes, and they all can be good as long as they fulfil their purpose.
You don't know what to watch, you want something light and entertaining. You are quite happy to watch three adorable actors for a while.
This is it.
This one will work for you.
It's silly, it has some funny jokes, it evolves at good pace, the story-line is only slightly bonkers, ...
You can see the budget was not big. But it doesn't need it.
It's well crafted and it keeps you entertained the whole time.
It doesn't drag, and you get a funny joke now and then. Only one or two laugh out loud ones, but plenty chuckles.
That's the kind of movie it is.
No idea why some people seem focused on trying to compare every movie to Citizen Kane.
They don't seem to understand that different movies have different purposes, and they all can be good as long as they fulfil their purpose.
You don't know what to watch, you want something light and entertaining. You are quite happy to watch three adorable actors for a while.
This is it.
This one will work for you.
The worst film I've watched that I really rather enjoyed. What a strangeness this is. It felt as though the brilliant cast were making something else that didn't take all that long, so, in their lunchbreaks they made a film on the side. The budget must have been at least £12.50 (ironically the total takings for the 9 o'clock showing not including crisps and a coke) but all that aside, we quite enjoyed it. Sad to say we were the only two in the late showing at our local budget cinema, slightly shocking considering it was the opening night.
Can't see films like this being the saviour of the silver screen.
I think the unnecessary gore and swearyness could easily have been cut and the film could have been a PG rather than a 15 opening up a much larger Easter holiday audience.
Can't see films like this being the saviour of the silver screen.
I think the unnecessary gore and swearyness could easily have been cut and the film could have been a PG rather than a 15 opening up a much larger Easter holiday audience.
क्या आपको पता है
- साउंडट्रैकThe Queen's Treble
written by John Johnson
performed by Princes in the Tower
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
- How long is Seize Them!?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
विवरण
बॉक्स ऑफ़िस
- दुनिया भर में सकल
- $3,24,493
- चलने की अवधि1 घंटा 31 मिनट
- रंग
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें