Acidman

Firstly, I'd just like to point out how beautiful this film looks, especially with its opening establishing shots. The camerawork and mise-en scene are on point throughout and really give an accurate sense of place and time.

However, whilst entertaining (if not a little slow) this movie does have some flaws baked into its script. For me, the Father is a well acted character with a lot to be uncovered, but his arc just doesn't progress as the film goes on, and too much is left unsaid about what is actually going on with him. Its arguable that the director leaves this up to the viewer to decide, but considering the films runtime and lack of any other subplots, its hard to excuse this lack of character development and closure by the time the credits roll.

I'd recommend this movie to anyone who likes a slower paced character driven drama, but isn't expecting too much by the films conclusion. Acidman is a perfect lazy Sunday watch when things to do are light on the ground.

What a waste of an hour and 30 mins. Nothing paranormal about this which left me disappointed.

Nothing happens in this movie. It's very dry and serious. The cinematography is dark and depressing.

The storyline is a father and daughter relationship and her denability of his illness which isn't actually investigated. He is a loner who is obsessed with communicating with aliens/paranormal beings. Communication is never found and leads the viewer wish there was at least some contact so that you can actually like the character.

Just a really dull film. Dull acting. Dull photography and Dull story.

Prior to fine rom-com "Meet Cute" Alex Lehmann directed the intimate, weighty yet sluggish dramas "Blue Jay", "Paddleton" & "Acidman". In the latter 20-something Dianna Agron (Alicia Vikander-esque) visits a remote, craggy, forested Oregon coast to try connecting with her estranged, reclusive & possibly mentally ill dad Thomas Haden Church (likeable as ever) who lives alone with his dog 'communicating' with UFOs. Plot-wise Lehmann & Chris Dowling's script is disappointingly thin, but as a dual character study it's rich enough (helped by the great two central performances (especially Agron)) - whether that's enough to entertain most tho is debatable.

Let's get that out of the way so that people don't spend 1.5 hours thinking they will see something Sci-Fi in this move when in fact there is nothing.

There should be a law against mis-labeling movies like this. It's the third movie I've seen that claims to be a Sci-Fi, and I wind being disappointed.

Some dude spending his life in the Oregon woods looking at the night sky for signs of UFO's does not qualify as a Science Fiction movie. This is frustrating and needs to stop.

On other hand, it was a decent drama about a daughter reuniting with her estranged father, which is why I gave it 6/10.

Dear filmmakers, please, please stop mislabeling your movie genres.

Started off ok , then turned into a very slow paced tragedy ! With a very awkward vibe throughout.

We never get to see why the dad was always going into stares , depersonalising- de realising etc . Found it odd , uncomfortable, hated the dog scene , which i found pointless , animal death will always kill a film , why ? Because there are too many animal lovers out here that just do not tolerate it , no matter what it gives to the scene - story line , in this instance gave nothing . He didnt even seem bothered about it .

We also never got to see what the whole sc fi was about ??? Soooo long winded , dissatisfying and strange !

I mean was he mad , did he have psychosis ?

Dementia ? Gah ... frustrating .

2 star for the dog only.