Tillsammans 99

This sequel is for people who get Lukas Moodysson, and who understands and entertains the dismantlement of stereotypes and enjoys seeing amazing actors, acting amazingly and being in themselves in their roles.

If you do this - you will be in for an amazing film, that simply is up there.

Touching, very funny and delicate. The way emotions can be abound, and emerge in people that meet again later in life, after sharing a part of an unique part of their life.

If you like Richard Linklater, Lars von Trier and want to enjoy their swedish equivalent - then this is the movie that'll throw you that, in a ultra swedish and warm, human manner.

After the fantastic Together (2000) that I gave an 8, Moodyson returns with this sleeping pill of a sequel. It would seem there is nothing interesting that can be said about these people as Moodyson didn't bother to come up with much of a story and instead focuses the energy into actor experimentation that goes nowhere neither revealing any actor skills nor depth of anything.

Everything feels like a second thought and scenes are like short films very loosely connected to each other. There's a framing timeline but it has no real meaning. I just wish he would had been quiet and hadn't made this pile of crap.

Unfortunately there have been signs in other films he's made that he's not as skilled as he tell himself as do some of his apologists that thinks he could do nothing bad. This is worse than bad. This is boring. Bye Lukas.

I loved the original movie, which can be regarded as a masterpiece. It was full of warmth and wit, and with engaging, talented actors. This follow-up, made 25 years later, unfortunately lacks everything that the original movie could offer. The actors seem tired and bored. If you loved the original movie, you will hate this one, it's really that bad. So, don't waste your time on this. It seems that it was made purely to milk some money. Once upon a time, Lukas Moodysson made exciting movies and Tillsammans (2000) was the best one in my opinion. But this one I think most people would prefer to forget.

This is is a textbook example of how not to do a sequel. It squanders the potential of its premise and cast with bad acting and a storyline that bewilders more than it entertains.

This film serves as a reminder that a successful follow-up requires more than just riding on the coattails of its predecessors-it needs a heart, something Tilsammans 99 sorely lacks. Fans of the original would do well to temper their expectations or perhaps skip this installment altogether, lest they tarnish their memories of a the first installment.

Moreover, the sequel fails to capture the original's charm and depth, coming off as a hollow imitation. Where its predecessor skillfully balanced action, character development, and thematic depth, "tillsammans 99" leans too heavily into spectacle without the substance to back it up. It's a classic case of style over substance, with flashy visuals and action sequences that momentarily dazzle but ultimately leave the viewer feeling empty.

Wow , how is it even possible to fail this one ? Really, there are so many different ways to do this movie thats it must basicly be harder to write a bad script than a good one

Its so simple, bring the characters back , now they are older, change their minds and after a good start with laugh and hugs let the drama begins and repeat same situations from 75 in different angles

But no ,, let it be a strange and boring manus without humour and let the viewer keep wondering in the whole movie why ,, why even bother to put toghetter this garbage

Some joker did a review with 10 stars, guess he mixed this one with the first because that one is brilliant, and loved the idea to do a new one 99 but what a disaster it went and Im not even disapointed, Im angry , what a missed oppurtunity and so much potential that throwned away , this should had been suffocated in its cradle , it should not have been borned.