Geomijip

Attention, two films with the same name are circulating from 2023. In this one, Korean heavyweights Kim Jee-won and Song Kang-ho work together again after a long time. That's promising and the result successfully fulfils any expectations. We get a film-within-a-film construct that certainly contains autobiographical traits. A director's lament about the difficulties of a production. Anyone who has ever dealt with the subject will have realised that filming can be hell. Stress, both physical and psychological at all points, constant time and budget pressure, trouble with producers, actors' sensitivities and general problems on set. And here in particular, we are in South Korea in the 70s, dealing with state authorities. All at the expense of artistic freedom! But don't worry, the film is far less heavy and dramatic than it is humorous. Subliminal humour, but very catchy despite the cultural differences. The highlight is certainly the grand finale, which also provides the most interesting part in terms of insights into the making of a film. Nevertheless, there is a catch and that is the length of the film. I can't even specifically accuse the film of having much potential for cuts, but around half an hour turns a pen into a stone. There's no such thing as perfect, and director Kim has to realise that all the time. And after the film is before the film. For us viewers, too, this film is amusing, but quickly forgotten.

No pun intended - this can be seen as a love letter. I would argue not just for Korean cinema (movie making that is), but any all over the world. But of course there are certain things that may be particular and just more on point there. It does play in the 70s, so I assume some things may have changed since then - one would hope so at least.

All that said, great acting - within acting - and movie within movie and all that. Though as is true with almost all movies that have a movie as central theme ... you have to suspend your disbelief ... as in making it non existent, if you catch my drift.

You could argue that we do not see the movie, but a spectator perspective ... fair point, but you mostly do not see the work that has to be done between shots. But that would kind of make the movie a drag ... this is about something else ... about a dream .. about showing critics that things are not as easy as they may think they are. Plus a lot of personal stories of course! May be a bit too long - and I was a bit surprised with the ... let's call it addition in the end ... but I reckon it was necessary ... to give us something back.

Well done to say the least - and realistic in a way (relationship wise), in a very unrealistic way - gotta love it. Also not to be confused with the American Cobweb ... renamed Knock Knock Knock in Germany ...

I saw only two reviews on this title and I felt compelled to write mine too :) The movie is good fun, a comedy about making movies, inspiration, failure, and the big massive problem of creating another masterpiece after you made one in the past. The movie is maybe a bit too long, it has some slow moments. And then in the last 20 minutes it picks up rhythm and energy for the gran finale ! Lots of surprises. All the time, for a moment you might think Homer Simpson wrote the script. Maybe there are other layers of meaning in the black and white movie. I enjoyed the actors and the music and the clothes. It has a very nice vibe, it is able to transmit the passion, love and energy necessary to make a movie and the happy atmosphere on set. Go watch it! Give it a go :)

I mistakenly bought tickets for the session with Danish subtitles in the Copenhagen Cinematek. Fun fact: I don´t speak Danish, nor Korean. So my impression about it is rather limited.

Cobweb is a comedy, the tale of a director trying to produce his masterpiece in the South Korea seventies. During the production, he has to manage actors, staff conflicts, censorship, and ghosts from the past. All situations presented in a light way.

Ultimately, it is a movie about movies and there are many opportunities during the film to nerd out about photography and production. Most of it takes place on a film set and there are several moments when you can enjoy this atmosphere. This happens, for example, in a very-well made and interesting climax scene.

Cobweb cast is high level. The main character is played by Song Kang-ho from Parasite, and there is some great acting from the supporting characters, especially Krystal Jang and Jeon Yeo-been, both performances won awards in Korea.

Overall, the movie is a nice, not pretentious comedy with a good story behind it. I was able to follow in spite of my language barrier. I absolutely recommend it, especially if you speak the language that it is being played in, and if you don´t, you can still watch it for the pure joy of the cinema.

A beautiful and sensitive picture about filmmaking.

Overall, it's understandable why the film has such a low rating. Not many people will like it or even want to watch a movie about how films are shot and created. Especially one from Korea. Particularly in 2023.

In a time when superheroes and superficial "works of art" have captured and corroded young minds, and in the era of short vertical videos, a rating of 6+ doesn't seem that low.

I didn't point this out for no reason. The film is packed with characters, actions, and events over its two-hour runtime. Because of this, it might feel drawn-out: so much happens, and only ten minutes have passed. But for me, it had the opposite effect-complete immersion in the story and the events, to the point where you feel like you're part of the film crew, and something depends on you too.

There's little point in discussing the shooting quality, framing, or acting in detail, as it's all clearly visible in the trailer. It's a high-quality production by all standards and in all aspects. So much so that you could quote both the visual moments and the dialogues.

Although Koreans have long been famous for their masterful blending of two genres, I still must note the excellent combination of drama and comedy here. While drama is generally straightforward and hard to surprise with, comedy is always a risk and a matter of taste. The humor here is excellent, as much as it possibly can be. There's no vulgarity, overacting, or leaning too heavily in one direction. Everything feels close to reality but slightly embellished for greater comedic effect. Especially within the film they are making inside this movie.

At some point, I caught myself thinking that this strongly resembles Soviet cinema. Just as grand and beautiful. And it's not just because the Stanislavski method is mentioned in the film, but because of the overall impression and atmosphere.

The main distinguishing feature of this film is that it doesn't just talk about the filmmaking process; it immerses the ordinary viewer (the person on the set) into everything. It shows how and what can happen on set. Moreover-we literally watch the creation of a film within a film and see the final result.

A scene shot in one take is particularly memorable. Everything about it is perfect: from the moment of its preparation to the final realization on the cinema screen. A double pleasure.

If you miss old films or pictures that leave you feeling warm and good inside, and you want to get genuine pleasure from watching-this is definitely what you need.