A Real Pain

I just finished this film and I have to say I'm surprised reading some of the bad reviews about it, I know film perception is subjective but I don't understand how someone could dislike this film. It was so interesting to me, and the thing is, nothing big really happens, you just follow these two cousins along their trip, it's normal, it's almost casual. There are not going to explain everything to you because there's no need for it. We have access to the superficial, to the bare minimum because that how the characters relate to each other, there so much they don't understand and so much that they don't say. The performances are all incredibly, especially Culkin. I was left crying by the end. Maybe you need to have dealt with depression to connect with it more. Maybe you need to have seen someone you love survive (or not) this painful illness. But I'm happy for this type of movies to exist. This stories also need to be told. As rare and unfitted for some people may seem.

Jesse Eisenberg's second effort as writer-director sets out to be something unconventional. There's something of Richard Linklater's BEFORE trilogy in the DNA of A REAL PAIN, with some recognizable inheritance from Michael Winterbottom's TRIP series also apparent. The perambulatory pacing, the languorous cinematography that asks you to look beneath the surface of touristy sights, the dialogue that meanders through an unpretentious and unstructured unpacking of the meaning of life, the total absence of any "bad guys," the near total absence of any outright conflict, the barest hint of any goal guiding the plot aside from the completion of a simple itinerary... A Real Pain shares all these realistic features with those earlier, more spirited, life-affirming films. Yet somehow... it doesn't quite work.

I'm not sure what was at fault with why I never really got into this movie. I think a large part of it has to do with all the supporting characters (i.e. Everyone besides the cousins played by Eisenberg and Kieran Culkin). Will Sharpe's non-Jewish tour guide, the Rwandan convert, the old couple, the sexy divorcee... the characters are all very basic, very conventional, very boring. The actors who play them are fine, but there's not much they're given to do, and so they seem unnatural and lifeless, more like set decorations than people. Eisenberg knows how to direct a camera, I think; he knows how to put the proper cinematic elements in place. But perhaps he doesn't know how to direct actors, or maybe he just doesn't know how to write characters. There's never anything to suggest that these people exist beyond the moments we see them in, which perhaps could've been fixed with some more spontaneous improvisation from the actors.

Eisenberg and especially Culkin are better in this regard, but there's still something rather stilted and "written" about a lot of what they say and do. Eisenberg's "workaholic salesman with OCD" is largely one-dimensional, and the few times where his character expands beyond that facade seem more like forced acting than any kind of genuine glimpse into something deeper. Culkin is wonderful--a glimpse perhaps of his Succession character if Roman Roy actually cared about people--but I think that's just a credit to Culkin's talent; he somehow manages to transcend what he's been given to work with.

This is a decent indie film with a few good laughs, a couple of interesting ideas, a memorable tour of Poland, and a solid performance from Culkin. From the trailer and the reviews, I was expecting something much funnier and emotionally impactful, but I'd still recommend the movie to anyone interested in it.

In 2022, Jesse Eisenberg's directorial debut, 'When You Finish Saving the World,' was released. A comic drama about the contentious relationship shared by a mother and son, it was not exactly a commercial success, though garnered some critical acclaim. Time's Stephanie Zacharek noted Eisenberg as "a thoughtful filmmaker, devoted to showing his characters as multi-dimensional, flawed human beings," while The New Yorker's Anthony Lane opined that the film was "taut with unhappiness but allows itself to be funny."

Those same observations could also easily be applied to his second feature 'A Real Pain'. It follows two Jewish Americans, cousins Benji and David, who embark on a trip to Poland to visit their ancestral home. Benji is outspoken and free-spirited, standing in stark contrast to the reserved David. As they explore Poland with their tour group, they are forced to confront their relationship, revealing deep-seated pain and insecurity on both sides.

On paper, it doesn't sound like a comedy- in fact, it sounds rather dour. However, to describe the film as such would be to do a disservice to Eisenberg's nuanced direction and screenplay. It is a bittersweet examination of family, both funny and heartbreaking, as well as a sharply written character-study tackling important themes. Through his deceptively simple, straightforward story, Eisenberg crafts a universal tale that many will find relevant.

It is a film about family, about navigating the ties that bind- perhaps about the need to maintain connections with those we love. It is about more than that, though. It is a story about the past, and how we, as people, deal with it- past mistakes, past histories, shared past experiences. Through their journey, Benji and David confront not only their own personal histories but also the collective memory of their family and their cultural heritage. As they uncover layers of their shared past, they are forced to grapple with the weight of generational trauma and the impact it has on their present lives.

The film is beautiful in its subtlety, Eisenberg weaving these story-threads unostentatiously. Moreover, he has a great ear for dialogue, and the conversations between the characters sound like just that: conversations. The film is not just a barrage of quips heavily laced with sarcasm, as many comedies are today. Although at times hilarious, the dialogue isn't insincere: characters actually have discussions and debates about topics of import.

Furthermore, Eisenberg's characterisation is deft. Benji and David feel like real people, not cardboard cut-outs with one aspect to their personalities. They're not drawn in black and white, but in shades of grey. Practically every character in the film is a multi-dimensional one, and their interactions with one another brim with authenticity. It's a testament to Eisenberg's screenwriting prowess that every character, no matter how small or inconsequential, feels fully fleshed out; with a life going on after the screen fades to black.

The film is also a technical achievement. Director of photography Michal Dymek's cinematography is as subtle and unassuming as the tale itself. He captures some haunting imagery, from Poland's cobble-stone streets and grim, post-Soviet architecture to the cold cruelty of a concentration camp. These visuals not only ground the narrative in a palpable reality but also evoke a deep emotional response, underscoring the film's themes of trauma and history.

In addition, the music of Frédéric Chopin is interwoven cleverly into the film, becoming a character in itself, his melancholy melodies seeming to heighten the drama and power of proceedings. Further, Robert Nassau's editing ensures the film has a good pace, never wanting for momentum.

Kieran Culkin and Jesse Eisenberg star as Benji and David, respectfully. Culkin is utterly terrific, playing Benji with a winning blend of charm and charmlessness, masterfully displaying his vulnerabilities and complexities. As Kris Kristofferson wrote, "he's a walking contradiction," who can light up a room as easy as he can drain all the life from it. Compelling and multi-faceted, Culkin's may be the best performance of 2024; so completely does he embody the damaged, charismatic character.

Eisenberg is the straight man to Culkin's gregarious charmer, underplaying it expertly. David is the stable one of the two, but not without his own issues. Eisenberg brings a lot of nuance to the role, capturing the subtleties of a character whose outward composure belies an internal pain. Their supporting cast do equally strong work, from the likes of Will Sharpe as the cousins' tour guide to Jennifer Grey as one of the tour group; none can be faulted.

In conclusion, Jesse Eisenberg's 'A Real Pain' is an extremely accomplished piece of work. Through its blend of humour and heartache, the film offers a poignant exploration of family, heritage and the complexities of human relationships. Eisenberg's strong direction and screenplay, combined with stellar performances from the cast, make it an unforgettable piece. A beautiful and thought-provoking journey resonating on multiple levels, 'A Real Pain' is a real joy.

I was really impressed by this movie. In my opinion it's a really original story. It's strength lies in it subtlety. It very accurately depicts the duality of people's character. The beauty and the shadow. I found it very interesting to see how what looked like "negative" behavior turned out to have some positive effect. How nothing is black and white. How being very direct also means being honest for example. It really makes you think.

The dynamics in the group were also interesting and heart-warming to watch. It shows how people can really connect over a short period of time.

Definitely worth the watch for those who are interested in the complexity of humans.

I saw this film at the AFI film festival in Hollywood last week. By the time I got to this film, I was suffering from a bit of filmgoing overload, and chatting with someone in the audience before the film began, I almost forgot what I was I going to see! But I was so glad I got to see this one! As you know from the synopsis, Jesse Eisenberg wrote, directed and stars in this great film about 2 cousins' journey to Poland to see the land of their beloved grandmother. Eisenberg perfectly plays a role that he seems made for - an uptight, nervous and dedicated family man who always wants to do the right thing. Joining Eisenberg is Kieran Culkin who plays the polar opposite of Eisenberg - he is garrulous, open, and willing to break the rules, much to Eisenberg's chagrin. Culkin's character easily makes friends with his fellow travelers and guide - again much to Eisenberg's amazement (and sometimes annoyance). The story itself is very involving, and you will find yourself wanting to join them on their tour. Culkin may be in the running for an Oscar on this one and Eisenberg may get a nomination for screenwriting and/or direction. So, I highly recommend you check this one out as soon as you can.