2030 में मिलान, वैश्विक जासूसी एजेंसी सिटाडेल का एक अंडरकवर एजेंट, शक्तिशाली दुश्मन सिंडिकेट मंटिकोर में एक गुप्तचर के रूप में दुश्मन की रेखाओं के पीछे फंस गया है।2030 में मिलान, वैश्विक जासूसी एजेंसी सिटाडेल का एक अंडरकवर एजेंट, शक्तिशाली दुश्मन सिंडिकेट मंटिकोर में एक गुप्तचर के रूप में दुश्मन की रेखाओं के पीछे फंस गया है।2030 में मिलान, वैश्विक जासूसी एजेंसी सिटाडेल का एक अंडरकवर एजेंट, शक्तिशाली दुश्मन सिंडिकेट मंटिकोर में एक गुप्तचर के रूप में दुश्मन की रेखाओं के पीछे फंस गया है।
एपिसोड ब्राउज़ करें
सारांश
Reviewers say 'Citadel: Diana' has mixed reception with praise for Matilda De Angelis' performance and action scenes. The international direction and Italian setting are appreciated. However, criticisms include a convoluted plot, lack of character development, and poor writing. Many find the series formulaic with predictable tropes and lackluster action. Dubbing and lip-sync issues are noted, alongside distractions from the main character's hairstyle. While some find it entertaining, others consider it a disappointing addition to the 'Citadel' franchise.
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
Jobs.
While Citadel: Diana had the potential to be a captivating international thriller, it falls totally flat in almost every aspect - except for Matilda. This feels like a low-budget series from the '90s. The storyline feels recycled, lacking any depth and complexity- unlike the first season. The pacing is uneven, with predictable twists that don't land anywhere. The show struggles to create meaningful tension or character development. The Amazon executives who approved these scripts should consider changing jobs.
Matilda, however, is the standout. She is the ONLY reason to keep watching the entire episodes which are painful to watch. She has a natural screen presence that captivates, and it's clear she's destined for greater roles. Hopefully, we'll see her in a major U. S. production soon, where her talent can truly shine.
In the end, while Citadel: Diana may not live up to expectations, it's worth watching just for Matilda- an amazing talent.
While Citadel: Diana had the potential to be a captivating international thriller, it falls totally flat in almost every aspect - except for Matilda. This feels like a low-budget series from the '90s. The storyline feels recycled, lacking any depth and complexity- unlike the first season. The pacing is uneven, with predictable twists that don't land anywhere. The show struggles to create meaningful tension or character development. The Amazon executives who approved these scripts should consider changing jobs.
Matilda, however, is the standout. She is the ONLY reason to keep watching the entire episodes which are painful to watch. She has a natural screen presence that captivates, and it's clear she's destined for greater roles. Hopefully, we'll see her in a major U. S. production soon, where her talent can truly shine.
In the end, while Citadel: Diana may not live up to expectations, it's worth watching just for Matilda- an amazing talent.
Another cliched mess offering nothing original just a rehash of better movies. Good actors does not make good video when all the other aspects are so lazy.
This is the sort of quality which makes me think AI has taken over Hollywood. So unoriginal just a scrap board of film and TV which has done well over the years.
There is also something strange about the audio. Like nothing was shot on site but all done latter in ADR and ADR done by someone who has no idea what they are doing.
Scenes are eerily quiet with so much background noise missing, voice has no inflections and sounds like in a studio.
Maybe it gets better in later episodes but it has too many problems for me.
This is the sort of quality which makes me think AI has taken over Hollywood. So unoriginal just a scrap board of film and TV which has done well over the years.
There is also something strange about the audio. Like nothing was shot on site but all done latter in ADR and ADR done by someone who has no idea what they are doing.
Scenes are eerily quiet with so much background noise missing, voice has no inflections and sounds like in a studio.
Maybe it gets better in later episodes but it has too many problems for me.
One person is obsessed over a haircut and the other is upset because it wasn't in English? Lmao gtfo. This is a good follow up to the original with a solid story line. Watch it for yourself and be the judge and PLEASE disregard these children who are close minded. From the original it was stated that Manticore was manipulating the world from the shadows. So not really sure why someone is upset because we got a story from Italy. When we know that manticore was formed from families around the world....
Like I said give it a watch and you be the judge. Too many people these days act like they are movie critics online because they know no one will listen to them in real life. I said what I said.
Like I said give it a watch and you be the judge. Too many people these days act like they are movie critics online because they know no one will listen to them in real life. I said what I said.
Maybe it is not a great history or a great production. I did not expected it to be, and I am not knowledgeable enough to be a critic. I have enjoyed a few hours of an action/ scifi/ spy tv show, and, not the least, the beautiful Matilda de Angelis.
I agree with the reviewer that one should watch and make their own judgment. It should not be a problem being in Italian, or centered in Italy, or using very long guns, or the tech that would make a secret cafe conversations impossible (unless they also have a tech to cover the conversation, which I believe is a reasonable expectation).
I do have an issue with picturing cold assassins as heroes. A more realistic character development would improve the show. But that is just me.
I agree with the reviewer that one should watch and make their own judgment. It should not be a problem being in Italian, or centered in Italy, or using very long guns, or the tech that would make a secret cafe conversations impossible (unless they also have a tech to cover the conversation, which I believe is a reasonable expectation).
I do have an issue with picturing cold assassins as heroes. A more realistic character development would improve the show. But that is just me.
Another unnecessary spin-off/show that relies on an unoriginal spy plot, stock characters, tropes, and cliffhangers, with the same a-young-protagonist-with-dead-parents-pretty-enough-to-be-mentored-to-seek-revenge story reminiscent of even better works such as the Hanna movie (not so much the TV Show).
I'm still unsure why this franchise from the Russo Brothers was pitched as a "global sci-fi event series," as it offers little that feels fresh or innovative. However, it might work for a one-day binge since it only has six episodes. The action sequences are also somewhat decent, and Matilda De Angelis delivers a semi-sold performance.
I'm still unsure why this franchise from the Russo Brothers was pitched as a "global sci-fi event series," as it offers little that feels fresh or innovative. However, it might work for a one-day binge since it only has six episodes. The action sequences are also somewhat decent, and Matilda De Angelis delivers a semi-sold performance.
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाItalian installment of the Russo Brothers' global thriller/spy event series Citadel (2023).
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
- How many seasons does Citadel: Diana have?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
विवरण
- चलने की अवधि
- 50 मि
- रंग
- ध्वनि मिश्रण
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें