अपनी भाषा में प्लॉट जोड़ेंA tornado, infested with prehistoric monsters, has formed in the Bermuda Triangle, and is making its way towards land. Now the city must fight to survive against these deadly creatures.A tornado, infested with prehistoric monsters, has formed in the Bermuda Triangle, and is making its way towards land. Now the city must fight to survive against these deadly creatures.A tornado, infested with prehistoric monsters, has formed in the Bermuda Triangle, and is making its way towards land. Now the city must fight to survive against these deadly creatures.
Amanda Jane York
- Robed Woman
- (as Amanda York)
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
Plot
A tornado, infested with prehistoric monsters, has formed in the Bermuda Triangle, and is making its way towards land. Now the city must fight to survive against these deadly creatures.
Cast
Usual suspects Danielle Scott and May Kelly ham it up and Jase Rivers is just terrible.
Verdict
It appears Sharknado has started it's own sub-genre, as if Clownado wasn't bad enough now we have Monsternado and it's beyond abyssmal.
So to be clear there's no logical explanation for it, the "Monsters" are mostly animals or exaggerated versions of them and as you'd imagine the CGI ranges from bad down to Spectrum graphics.
The cast are weak, but our girls who play FBI agents oh dear that's next level cringe inducing levels of "Acting" and I couldn't use that word me loosely.
Monsternado is on par with Sharknado in that it's ugly, nobody in front of the camera is trying, nobody behind the camera knows what they're doing and it'll entertain you in the same way as a carrier bag blowing in the wind does. Namely you have no idea why you're even watching it.
Rants
You know instances where a person will defend someone who is entirely talentless and the reason is that they're attracted to them. Such as girls with boy bands or guys with the Kardashians! May Kelly is one for me, I like seeing in in films and appreciated seeing her here! Sadly the girl has the acting aptitude of a bag of farts.
Breakdown
Interesting premise CGI is very poor Acting is non-existent Oozes incompetence at every stage.
A tornado, infested with prehistoric monsters, has formed in the Bermuda Triangle, and is making its way towards land. Now the city must fight to survive against these deadly creatures.
Cast
Usual suspects Danielle Scott and May Kelly ham it up and Jase Rivers is just terrible.
Verdict
It appears Sharknado has started it's own sub-genre, as if Clownado wasn't bad enough now we have Monsternado and it's beyond abyssmal.
So to be clear there's no logical explanation for it, the "Monsters" are mostly animals or exaggerated versions of them and as you'd imagine the CGI ranges from bad down to Spectrum graphics.
The cast are weak, but our girls who play FBI agents oh dear that's next level cringe inducing levels of "Acting" and I couldn't use that word me loosely.
Monsternado is on par with Sharknado in that it's ugly, nobody in front of the camera is trying, nobody behind the camera knows what they're doing and it'll entertain you in the same way as a carrier bag blowing in the wind does. Namely you have no idea why you're even watching it.
Rants
You know instances where a person will defend someone who is entirely talentless and the reason is that they're attracted to them. Such as girls with boy bands or guys with the Kardashians! May Kelly is one for me, I like seeing in in films and appreciated seeing her here! Sadly the girl has the acting aptitude of a bag of farts.
Breakdown
Interesting premise CGI is very poor Acting is non-existent Oozes incompetence at every stage.
A movie called Monsternado will of course never win any awards, but I have seen a lot worse movies this year and if you have some drinks this is almost watchable. The acting is okayish, and the production value for a low budget trashy spoofy monster flick is not so bad. This is very amateurish, and you can tell from the bad CGi sure, but even more so comes to audio- and directing.
This is very generic, very basic, and as any of these 'nado movies you know what you get. Watching this movie is like eating at a bad McDonalds restaurant.
I cannot recommend this, and I give it a 3/10 because the film value and production etc it does not deserve anything higher. But this is also not complete trash and its sort of fun in a goofy way. I applaud the effort on the low budget, and I can see a few nuggets of light here and there.
This is very generic, very basic, and as any of these 'nado movies you know what you get. Watching this movie is like eating at a bad McDonalds restaurant.
I cannot recommend this, and I give it a 3/10 because the film value and production etc it does not deserve anything higher. But this is also not complete trash and its sort of fun in a goofy way. I applaud the effort on the low budget, and I can see a few nuggets of light here and there.
So apparently, the Director and producer got together and decided that they would approach a hotel in the backside of nowhere in the middle of London.
As far as I can see everything was filmed inside the hotel except hilariously for two shots which were in the street outside. I'm not kidding. I checked it out on Google Maps and it's right outside the front door.
My theory is that they persuaded somebody in the hotel that this would be great PR and they all had an absolute blast running up and down and sticking badly rendered CGI in the background, in return for a few free nights accommodation, and no doubt some epic drinking sessions.
One of the highlights of the film was the flyover Dublin city. Particularly the Liffey. I think they reversed the shot in order to try and hide it but they just flipped it over. The Dublin Civic offices were on the wrong side of the river. A stock shot which they bought no doubt.
Finally, I couldn't help, but notice that several of the women look like men in drag. I have no problem with that, but you'd have to ask yourself the question why? I would say hangovers.
In conclusion, this is worth the five minutes I spent fast forwarding through it and laughing heartily throughout. Fair play guys. You did it and enjoyed it and some people watched it. Destined to be a cult classic. If you can get this thing made, you can do anything! It.
As far as I can see everything was filmed inside the hotel except hilariously for two shots which were in the street outside. I'm not kidding. I checked it out on Google Maps and it's right outside the front door.
My theory is that they persuaded somebody in the hotel that this would be great PR and they all had an absolute blast running up and down and sticking badly rendered CGI in the background, in return for a few free nights accommodation, and no doubt some epic drinking sessions.
One of the highlights of the film was the flyover Dublin city. Particularly the Liffey. I think they reversed the shot in order to try and hide it but they just flipped it over. The Dublin Civic offices were on the wrong side of the river. A stock shot which they bought no doubt.
Finally, I couldn't help, but notice that several of the women look like men in drag. I have no problem with that, but you'd have to ask yourself the question why? I would say hangovers.
In conclusion, this is worth the five minutes I spent fast forwarding through it and laughing heartily throughout. Fair play guys. You did it and enjoyed it and some people watched it. Destined to be a cult classic. If you can get this thing made, you can do anything! It.
Inspired by one of the worst, although knowingly stupid, film franchises of recent years and brought to you by the production team of that awful Winnie the Pooh movie earlier in the year and countless other low budget, soft 'prawn' movies.
Everything is terrible. The acting, the plot , the script, the CGI, the direction......everything.
So why give it a two. Well at least they tried. They did succeed in getting a movie movie produced and released ( although I do think that this one actually escaped).
Also, why did a mostly British cast in a movie filmed in the UK speak with American accents. I know it was set in the states but clearly was filmed in London.....whatever.
Everything is terrible. The acting, the plot , the script, the CGI, the direction......everything.
So why give it a two. Well at least they tried. They did succeed in getting a movie movie produced and released ( although I do think that this one actually escaped).
Also, why did a mostly British cast in a movie filmed in the UK speak with American accents. I know it was set in the states but clearly was filmed in London.....whatever.
I typically enjoy cheesy monster and disaster sci-fi movies. I think I have probably seen all of them in the past 20 or 25 years. This one, however, is awful! It is the worst of the worst. I stopped watching it after about 30 minutes because it was a complete waste of time. The plot at that point was utterly ridiculous. The acting was laughable at best. The script was mostly expletives with very little actual dialogue. This is supposed to be in the Action and Horror category. Comedy of Errors would be a better category. I have watched a lot of bad movies all the way through. This one I chose not to because it wasn't getting any better and I wasn't wasting anymore time.
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाAt about 15 minutes, for a movie set in the US, this car with right side steering would be seen on roads in the United Kingdom where they drive on the left.
- गूफ़This is supposed to be taking place in the US, but in the meeting with FEMA (an American federal agency) at the beginning, you can clearly see London's iconic Gherkin building out the window.
- साउंडट्रैकEyes on Me
Performed by Inas
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
विवरण
- चलने की अवधि
- 1 घं 21 मि(81 min)
- रंग
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 2.39:1
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें