अपनी भाषा में प्लॉट जोड़ेंWhen Maggie sets fire to the kitchen, her recently single son, Arthur, moves back into the family home where eccentric Maggie calls all the shots.When Maggie sets fire to the kitchen, her recently single son, Arthur, moves back into the family home where eccentric Maggie calls all the shots.When Maggie sets fire to the kitchen, her recently single son, Arthur, moves back into the family home where eccentric Maggie calls all the shots.
- पुरस्कार
- 4 कुल नामांकन
एपिसोड ब्राउज़ करें
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
Matt Okine should seriously apologise to the original cast of the original show. This is AWFUL in every sense of the word, it isn't funny, it has NO heart and takes everything away from the original, ABC should send out an apology to everyone that had to endure the first season... And apologize to the audience for the second season it's about to get.
I cannot believe this was greenlighted in the first place. It was one of the WORST shows that aired in 2023 and that's saying something there were some shockers but this one takes the cake.
Nothing good about this being tacky, with two main cast members who are actually good comedians but the terrible writing and script throws it for a loop and out the window.
Truly trash, watch the original instead because it is so much better then what this version served up.
I cannot believe this was greenlighted in the first place. It was one of the WORST shows that aired in 2023 and that's saying something there were some shockers but this one takes the cake.
Nothing good about this being tacky, with two main cast members who are actually good comedians but the terrible writing and script throws it for a loop and out the window.
Truly trash, watch the original instead because it is so much better then what this version served up.
If you never heard or watched any episodes of the classic iconic great Australian comedy from 1980s-1990s, then you will probably enjoy this series more. I personally wish this new reboot had nothing to attached itself to the old classic. Unfortunately they have taken characters names and well, the rest is completely new. In fact, I feel by using the same character names it somewhat offensive and will upset the older hardcore fans. They should have created new identities, and not even called a reboot.
The other problem I have with this show is a complete lack of understanding of dementia and carers. The writers did not do their homework. I myself am a carer for my elderly father. My dad has good days and bad days. And I do connect with Arthur'd frustration. But the writers are completely clueless of different issues affecting the elderly. And the writers certainly do not know about any of the financial assistance available and the different services out there to assist. They have created Arthur as the son who seems more like a freeloader bum by making out there is something wrong with Maggie who had an accident while cooking one day. Meanwhile, Robbie should be investigated for taking advantage of her Mother and have any powers limited. In all following episodes, there is actually nothing wrong with Maggie. Is this done on purpose?
I initially watch this new comedy thinking it was gping to be a possible laugh out enjoyment. Its not funny. But did enjoy it for Arthur's story. And for that I gave it caring 7/10.
The other problem I have with this show is a complete lack of understanding of dementia and carers. The writers did not do their homework. I myself am a carer for my elderly father. My dad has good days and bad days. And I do connect with Arthur'd frustration. But the writers are completely clueless of different issues affecting the elderly. And the writers certainly do not know about any of the financial assistance available and the different services out there to assist. They have created Arthur as the son who seems more like a freeloader bum by making out there is something wrong with Maggie who had an accident while cooking one day. Meanwhile, Robbie should be investigated for taking advantage of her Mother and have any powers limited. In all following episodes, there is actually nothing wrong with Maggie. Is this done on purpose?
I initially watch this new comedy thinking it was gping to be a possible laugh out enjoyment. Its not funny. But did enjoy it for Arthur's story. And for that I gave it caring 7/10.
Who thought this was a good idea?
If ever there was proof that Australian TV is a cultural desert, here it is. Also proof that you need a lot more than the inclusion of minorities and "box ticking" to make something memorable in a good way. Not a single laugh out loud moment in the first episode, or any tangible pathos or even a moment of authentic affection. All hallmarks of the original series. Why do we not have any directors who will play a straight bat with the "talent" and tell them that this is not Home And Away and you need to show some skills here. Denise Scott may have pulled it off with a proper script but the casting just didn't work.
If ever there was proof that Australian TV is a cultural desert, here it is. Also proof that you need a lot more than the inclusion of minorities and "box ticking" to make something memorable in a good way. Not a single laugh out loud moment in the first episode, or any tangible pathos or even a moment of authentic affection. All hallmarks of the original series. Why do we not have any directors who will play a straight bat with the "talent" and tell them that this is not Home And Away and you need to show some skills here. Denise Scott may have pulled it off with a proper script but the casting just didn't work.
I am a big fan of Denise Scott and was looking forward to this remake of the classic show. When it started I thought it was going to be ok....but as it went on the wheels well and truly fell off!
The story was all over the place and the story line was weird!
I don't think Matt Okene (?) is my sort of comedian and I just found it all very predictable and confused. He does seem to present as a natural comedic actor and has poor acting ability.
This could have been a great opportunity to present this classic to a new audience but this missed the mark.
We seem to think repeating past shows with a modern twist will work....this proves that it does not always work!
Give this a miss.
The story was all over the place and the story line was weird!
I don't think Matt Okene (?) is my sort of comedian and I just found it all very predictable and confused. He does seem to present as a natural comedic actor and has poor acting ability.
This could have been a great opportunity to present this classic to a new audience but this missed the mark.
We seem to think repeating past shows with a modern twist will work....this proves that it does not always work!
Give this a miss.
Whoever thought they could recreate this classic is ridiculous. I gave it a go, not sure how I sat through the first episode, appalling. Gary McDonald & Ruth Cracknell made these characters to perfection, no one could ever do it justice reinventing. Why can't they leave the classics alone! I certainly will not be watching another episode & telling everyone I know how dreadful this 2023 version is. Even down to the swearing & brief nudity. I'm not a prude by any means, and I know times have changed & this is a modern day version of M&S, however that was great about the show, no foul language & a family show everyone of all ages could watch.
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाIn a dedication to Garry McDonald, the original Arthur, a scene in the credits of episode 1 shows Okine's Arthur using tissues to help with some shaving knicks. One of McDonald's other renown characters was Norman Gunstan who always appeared with paper covering his shaving knicks.
- कनेक्शनRemake of Mother and Son (1984)
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
- How many seasons does Mother and Son have?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
विवरण
- रंग
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें