'Twas the Text Before Christmas

The last GAF movie I watched had over the top autumn decorations and annoying background music. Fast forward to this Christmas movie and now we have over the top Christmas decor and more distracting background music. I'm not sure who thinks this adds to the movies but please stop!

Other than these distractions, I thought it was a good movie although the pace was slow, especially the romance between Addie and James. The leads, Merritt Patterson and Trevor Donovan, worked well together and I liked the interactions with Jayne Eastwood's "Nana". Probably not a movie I'd watch again but enjoyable for a one time view.

The GAF movies I wave watched so far have improved a little this year but the decorations & set design are awful to look at; too much just lumped on and it appears its recycled into several movies. It takes away from the improved story telling. Even the snow is visibly fake, no care is taken to create a convincing illusion of it. Someone is a sleep on the job and could do so much better with some effort Please please do not let your audiences and cast down with this lack of attention to the canvass on which the stories are told. Without which we are better off listening and not watching and that's a real let down.

This movie is supposed to span a period of 2 years, and 3 Christmases. But amazingly, none of the characters change in any way during this 2 year span. They wear the same clothes, I think Trevor has maybe 2 shirts during the whole movie, one of which looks very very cheap and poorly made. The character's hair, all of them, doesn't change one iota. A 11-12 year old girl, an age at which there are normally TONS of changes, does not change one little bit.

The restaurant scenes with the female lead and her father are exactly the same all 3-4 times. Same table, same background people, everything the same. Even though the several scenes take place over this 2 year period.

The movie itself is pretty boring. The actress playing the elderly mom would be more suited to play the grandmother, she has to be at least 75. She's fine, but unless Trevor is 50+, too old to play his mother.

Merritt Patterson is exactly the same in every role. Shiny happy face, no depth. Neither her nor Trevor are given much to work with here, just so so boooring, no chemistry at all. He is so wasted here.

GAF need to tone down their set decoration for these movies. It's always over the top and unrealistic. And doesn't anyone use other types of Christmas tree decorations? Why just large shiny balls everywhere? A women who loves Christmas and is 65+ in age would have a ton of more vintage looking stuff.

The idea is not bad, leading actors i usually find likeable and the supporting ones were all pleasant, but it's like the writer and director tried to keep it as primitive as possible. Nor was there a hint of chemistry between the leads. Till the last moment they were willing to give up on each other, then he decides her happiness means so much to him that he's willing to follow her to another country... (when it makes a lot of sense to stay in his new home now, near his mom they both love...)

To offer a half-baked product that has all the potential of being a satisfying and original story with good actors must be ...sad.

I really like both leads as I've seen them in other movies where they've shone. This wasn't the case. The premise was nice enough but the characters lacked credibility and depth.

After the meet cute, their chemistry seemed lacking as another reviewer said there was no angst. There was no pining, no emotions or longing just gestures. Found this a tiresome, boring watch to be honest even for this genre. I think the use of year in the life was wasted and could have been better captured though I understand the time limitations.

I loved the family feel to the movie and the settings which were beautiful. The acting wasn't too bad too though contrived at times.