IMDb रेटिंग
5.6/10
4.6 हज़ार
आपकी रेटिंग
भारतीय अदालत में शैतानी कब्जे पर आधारित पहली हत्या का मुकदमा. इस असाधारण कहानी में पुनर्नायनों और वीडियो का उपयोग करते हुए एक युवा लड़के के पास शैतान के होने की जांच की गई है.भारतीय अदालत में शैतानी कब्जे पर आधारित पहली हत्या का मुकदमा. इस असाधारण कहानी में पुनर्नायनों और वीडियो का उपयोग करते हुए एक युवा लड़के के पास शैतान के होने की जांच की गई है.भारतीय अदालत में शैतानी कब्जे पर आधारित पहली हत्या का मुकदमा. इस असाधारण कहानी में पुनर्नायनों और वीडियो का उपयोग करते हुए एक युवा लड़के के पास शैतान के होने की जांच की गई है.
Carl Glatzel Jr.
- Self - David's Eldest Brother
- (as Carl Glatzel)
Maximos McIntyre
- Self - Russian Orthodox Priest
- (as Father Maximos)
Debbie Glatzel
- Self - David's Sister
- (आर्काइव फ़ूटेज)
Judy Glatzel
- Self - David's Mother
- (आर्काइव फ़ूटेज)
Carl Glatzel Sr.
- Self - David's Father
- (आर्काइव फ़ूटेज)
Ed Warren
- Self - Paranormal Investigator
- (आर्काइव फ़ूटेज)
Lorraine Warren
- Self - Paranormal Investigator
- (आर्काइव फ़ूटेज)
Alan Bono
- Self - Debbie's Boss
- (आर्काइव फ़ूटेज)
Merv Griffin
- Self - Host, The Merv Griffin Show
- (आर्काइव फ़ूटेज)
Walter Flanagan
- Self - State's Attorney
- (आर्काइव फ़ूटेज)
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
It was a very interesting and beautiful documentary. I really enjoyed watching it. When you watch it, you think you're watching a documentary, but you think you're watching a horror movie. In my opinion, this is the first documentary that brought the world of summoning into question. I want to say that this documentary was one of the beautiful supernatural documentaries that I saw. I wish they would make a documentary about the rest of the Summoning series so that the world would be more aware of supernatural events and realize that demons and demons exist just as we do. And finally, if you think that there are no demons and that the movies that start with a lie to make more money, watch this documentary, that all these movies are not like this, and some of the movies and series are really true stories.
A young boy is apparently being possessed by a demon. David sees visions, hears things, sounds demonic, and needs an intervention from the Catholic church. A murder happens, and an interesting defence is put forward.
I'm not totally convinced here, it was a watchable hour or so, but it didn't really have a lot of meat on the bone as it were. Sure it's out in time for Halloween, but the wonderfully imagery doesn't quite tell the whole story, yes it's about possession, but it's very talky.
Your enjoyment level is going to depend on where you sit on the whole debate of demons and possessions being real or not. I looked for a plausible solution, for me it felt as though were presented with a very credible one.
Let's applaud it for not being made into a six part series, it's pretty brief, and there is some interesting content, and some startling footage. You will see heavy influences for horror films, those were interesting to spot.
Sominex, wow that advert was quite something, that was a pretty unexpected twist.
6/10.
I'm not totally convinced here, it was a watchable hour or so, but it didn't really have a lot of meat on the bone as it were. Sure it's out in time for Halloween, but the wonderfully imagery doesn't quite tell the whole story, yes it's about possession, but it's very talky.
Your enjoyment level is going to depend on where you sit on the whole debate of demons and possessions being real or not. I looked for a plausible solution, for me it felt as though were presented with a very credible one.
Let's applaud it for not being made into a six part series, it's pretty brief, and there is some interesting content, and some startling footage. You will see heavy influences for horror films, those were interesting to spot.
Sominex, wow that advert was quite something, that was a pretty unexpected twist.
6/10.
The Devil On Trial might be interesting for people that liked The Conjuring. I'm one of them that enjoy that kind of stories. Do I believe all those things really happened? To be honest, not really, and this documentary turns more towards that way towards the end. Overall it's well made, the re-enactment looks believable, but I doubt that The Warrens are what they say they are. To me they look like conmen in this documentary and because of that all The Conjuring movies look more unrealistic from now on. The Devil On Trial is just for people that like easy entertainment, in this case a horror story based on true or false events. That's up to you to decide.
There seems to be 2 divided sets of opinion on this documentary. It mainly comes down to preconceptions regarding the reality of the supernatural. Conformation bias will have some people getting near the end, hearing the oldest brother's recollection of events and concluding 'it was all a big lie from the start' and consider the first ¾ of the documentary a waste of time.
Those people who do believe in the supernatural or have had personal experience with the supernatural will find the first ¾ of the documentary a fascinating account of demonic influence and possession.
There's really no conclusive evidence for either viewpoint as we can only base our opinions on what has been described by the those who were there and the audio recordings that were made. The viewer will decide who they believe is the most trustworthy in their retelling of events. Who they consider trustworthy will most likely be the party who mirrors the viewer's own worldview most closely.
Those people who do believe in the supernatural or have had personal experience with the supernatural will find the first ¾ of the documentary a fascinating account of demonic influence and possession.
There's really no conclusive evidence for either viewpoint as we can only base our opinions on what has been described by the those who were there and the audio recordings that were made. The viewer will decide who they believe is the most trustworthy in their retelling of events. Who they consider trustworthy will most likely be the party who mirrors the viewer's own worldview most closely.
The entire first hour of this documentary plays out like a horror film, and when I realized early on that it's a re-imagining of the third Conjuring film, the events were less impactful. I'd read about the Glatzel case at the time, and while it seemed interesting from a cinematic perspective, I doubt there was enough material for it to be explored as a matter-of-fact documentary. But here, the makers chose not to go that route and spent almost 55-60 minutes detailing supernatural events that may or may not have happened, with scenes re-created in the style of a typical horror flick (replete with jumpscares).
It's only the final 20 minutes or so, that the titular case comes under question. The demonic possession plea was never accepted to begin with, and therefore, it really has no value in any of the proceedings. What did surprise me is how Netflix also decided to question the Warrens' approach to media and money-making when it has several films from The Conjuring universe in its catalog. That, to me, was an interesting take.
It's only the final 20 minutes or so, that the titular case comes under question. The demonic possession plea was never accepted to begin with, and therefore, it really has no value in any of the proceedings. What did surprise me is how Netflix also decided to question the Warrens' approach to media and money-making when it has several films from The Conjuring universe in its catalog. That, to me, was an interesting take.
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाThe Warrens are the couple that The Conjuring are based on.
- भाव
David Glatzel: [Possessed speaking to the priest] Fat dick, pork chop
- कनेक्शनFeatured in Zodiac Killer Project (2025)
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
विवरण
- रिलीज़ की तारीख़
- कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
- आधिकारिक साइटें
- भाषा
- इस रूप में भी जाना जाता है
- Суд над Дияволом
- उत्पादन कंपनी
- IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें
- चलने की अवधि1 घंटा 21 मिनट
- रंग
- ध्वनि मिश्रण
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 2.35 : 1
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें