IMDb रेटिंग
4.3/10
5.3 हज़ार
आपकी रेटिंग
अपनी भाषा में प्लॉट जोड़ेंA rogue Police Detective in search of his parents' killer is murdered and then reborn as the ultimate killer.A rogue Police Detective in search of his parents' killer is murdered and then reborn as the ultimate killer.A rogue Police Detective in search of his parents' killer is murdered and then reborn as the ultimate killer.
- निर्देशक
- लेखक
- स्टार
Dean Jagger
- Corbin Nash
- (as Dean S. Jagger)
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
Thankfully saw this on a pirated dvd n was able to fast forward some utterly boring scenes.
Got enticed into seeing this awful film due to some misleading fake reviews n the trailer.
What kinda vampire organizes ring fights?
The ring fights were boring too.
Our lead actor is bitten by hordes of vampires but i dont kno how n why he is healed miraculously n nursed by a stripper.
Malcolm McDowell n Rutger Hauer is totally wasted. They must b bankrupt to take part in this awful film.
Ther is no tension, ther is nothing scary in this film, the editing is awfully bad n the best was the ending man.
The cross dresser vampire tells the other vampire to take revenge n kill the lead guy. I expected some showdown but hohoho.
The movie was not good, the writing was poor. honestly this movie was not half as good as the worst lostboys movie, i think the worst one got a 4.6. like i said honest. its not the worst movie i've ever seen, but its like miles from being decent. feldman is poor, his trans-whatever vampire is just nonsense. what is wrong with him. how the producers ever got mcdowell and hauer to make cameos in this movie is beyond me. must have a slow decade.
The movie is low budget, the writing is shoddy and the acting is okay. It's nothing special. I tried very hard to watch this movie. I read the reviews that were very positive and took a chance on it and really regretted my decision to watch it.
It has a lot of promise, the sound effects were spot on, the B roll was excellent but the movie really disappoints in the A roll, the acting and the editing. I became really frustrated with the way the A roll was shot for this movie. In the first 10 minutes of the movie they don't consider framing to be important, so things that need to be wide angled are shot closely and things that are shot closely are wide angled. It makes no artistic or functional sense.
There's a dialogue scene in the first 10 minutes where the main character is speaking to another influential character and the acting is just....poor. There is no tension, there is no real emotion being shown, it's like they told the main actor to act conflicted and he took that to mean act as if he was constipated! The line delivery in that conversation was so poor, the timing so bad, I wonder if the person who cast these roles even cared!
Then there's the editing. Oh God, the editing. In that same conversation they switch the A roll (primary shots) between the two characters for every line they speak. For roughly 3 minutes you have the camera going right-left, left-right, back and forth for every....single....line of dialogue, without any transition, it's almost all straight cuts. They do use L and J cuts but sparingly. If you're epileptic and can be triggered, I'd avoid this movie at all costs.
I'll try to watch it again, because I've never felt the need to write such a negative review of a movie before. I want to be fair to the people who worked on this movie, but from my first watch, it was terrible.
It has a lot of promise, the sound effects were spot on, the B roll was excellent but the movie really disappoints in the A roll, the acting and the editing. I became really frustrated with the way the A roll was shot for this movie. In the first 10 minutes of the movie they don't consider framing to be important, so things that need to be wide angled are shot closely and things that are shot closely are wide angled. It makes no artistic or functional sense.
There's a dialogue scene in the first 10 minutes where the main character is speaking to another influential character and the acting is just....poor. There is no tension, there is no real emotion being shown, it's like they told the main actor to act conflicted and he took that to mean act as if he was constipated! The line delivery in that conversation was so poor, the timing so bad, I wonder if the person who cast these roles even cared!
Then there's the editing. Oh God, the editing. In that same conversation they switch the A roll (primary shots) between the two characters for every line they speak. For roughly 3 minutes you have the camera going right-left, left-right, back and forth for every....single....line of dialogue, without any transition, it's almost all straight cuts. They do use L and J cuts but sparingly. If you're epileptic and can be triggered, I'd avoid this movie at all costs.
I'll try to watch it again, because I've never felt the need to write such a negative review of a movie before. I want to be fair to the people who worked on this movie, but from my first watch, it was terrible.
There is nothing good to say about this movie. This movie is about as good as Feldman's music. Take my word & don't waste your time or you'll never get it back.
Awful does not start to tell you the let down. Where in the universe do these reviewers giving 9 and 10 come from? One even wrote "best movie of the year". You got to be kidding me!
I admit, the ploy is always the same: early on upon movie release, all these people show up with lots and lots of standard / non sensical praises extolling the worse movies. Technically, this trick is as old as online reviews: it fortunately should not fool anybody. Well, except me this time... I saw the IMDB average 6.something rating, thought why not? and went for it.
Well, that was a mistake: this movie was like a bad dream with nothing to redeem it. A bad movie with all the ingredients: the misfits vampires, the violent weirdos, a meh! vague story, a bout of MMA, lots of blood, a tiny touch of gothic atmosphere and above all, Ladies and Gentlemen, real baaaad acting. If you have 1:35 hour to waste, here is the occasion.
I admit, the ploy is always the same: early on upon movie release, all these people show up with lots and lots of standard / non sensical praises extolling the worse movies. Technically, this trick is as old as online reviews: it fortunately should not fool anybody. Well, except me this time... I saw the IMDB average 6.something rating, thought why not? and went for it.
Well, that was a mistake: this movie was like a bad dream with nothing to redeem it. A bad movie with all the ingredients: the misfits vampires, the violent weirdos, a meh! vague story, a bout of MMA, lots of blood, a tiny touch of gothic atmosphere and above all, Ladies and Gentlemen, real baaaad acting. If you have 1:35 hour to waste, here is the occasion.
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाCourtney Gains and Corey Feldman appeared in The 'Burbs (1989).
- गूफ़In the opening scene, the car is shown with license plate 4Q49901, but as the car comes to a stop it reads 4KZ0846.
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
- How long is Corbin Nash?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
विवरण
- चलने की अवधि
- 1 घं 34 मि(94 min)
- रंग
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 16:9 HD
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें