अपनी भाषा में प्लॉट जोड़ेंA woman's body is discovered. She has been brutally murdered during the night. Veteran Police officer Pamela believes only a man could have done this. But in a world where men are bound by a... सभी पढ़ेंA woman's body is discovered. She has been brutally murdered during the night. Veteran Police officer Pamela believes only a man could have done this. But in a world where men are bound by a curfew from 7pm to 7am, her theory is rejected.A woman's body is discovered. She has been brutally murdered during the night. Veteran Police officer Pamela believes only a man could have done this. But in a world where men are bound by a curfew from 7pm to 7am, her theory is rejected.
- पुरस्कार
- 3 जीत और कुल 3 नामांकन
एपिसोड ब्राउज़ करें
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
The concept definitely had potential to be very interesting and for the most part it lived up to expectations.
Narratively, it could've been stronger. There were too many sub-plots established as attempts at red herrings. Credit where it's due, the ending was unexpected, but the constant red herrings made it hard for viewers to follow along and as usual, opened up a lot of plot holes.
I have no gripes with the performances from the main cast. And the main characters were all fleshed out well and consistent. It seems as though audiences are encouraged to dislike the main two women (played by Mandip Gill and Alexendra Burke) or at the very least dissaprove of their divisive actions, but simultaneously we also found ourselves rooting for them.
Overall, a good watch and would be interested in a second season.
Narratively, it could've been stronger. There were too many sub-plots established as attempts at red herrings. Credit where it's due, the ending was unexpected, but the constant red herrings made it hard for viewers to follow along and as usual, opened up a lot of plot holes.
I have no gripes with the performances from the main cast. And the main characters were all fleshed out well and consistent. It seems as though audiences are encouraged to dislike the main two women (played by Mandip Gill and Alexendra Burke) or at the very least dissaprove of their divisive actions, but simultaneously we also found ourselves rooting for them.
Overall, a good watch and would be interested in a second season.
This is a good drama with interesting themes being explored.
Its suspicious to me that the bad reviews focus simply on accusing this of being man hating. It brings up themes around violence on women and what could be done to improve this. It also turns some views back around to men, perhaps to get them to think about the learned culture they have been brough up in.
If its not obvious it is a work of fiction and of course could not really happen in real life...........!
As a murder mystery its alright - but its the rest of it that is the bigger message. The last ep is well paced with a suitable conclusion.
Its suspicious to me that the bad reviews focus simply on accusing this of being man hating. It brings up themes around violence on women and what could be done to improve this. It also turns some views back around to men, perhaps to get them to think about the learned culture they have been brough up in.
If its not obvious it is a work of fiction and of course could not really happen in real life...........!
As a murder mystery its alright - but its the rest of it that is the bigger message. The last ep is well paced with a suitable conclusion.
Watching the 2024 TV show Curfew, what I experienced instead was a slow-moving storyline that took its time to build momentum, which was disappointing. More significantly, though, the show seemed to embody a troubling trend that has become all too common in contemporary media: the demonization of men. This portrayal, one that I found deeply offensive, points to a broader problem in modern storytelling, where gender politics increasingly shape the portrayal of characters in an unbalanced and often harmful way.
Curfew starts with a slow, methodical approach, setting up a world where the government has imposed a curfew, ostensibly to protect women from "evil" men, which is all men (of course). While the world-building is intriguing, the show quickly becomes bogged down in its own political and social commentary. As the story unfolds, it becomes clear that the male characters in the series are painted with broad, negative strokes, a symptom of the growing trend in media that seeks to marginalize or villainize men in a misguided attempt to uplift women.
In Curfew, many of the male characters are portrayed as either villains, buffoons, or otherwise morally compromised individuals. They are often impulsive, aggressive, or driven by selfish desires, while the women are presented as morally superior, more competent, and more compassionate. The contrast is stark and, frankly, unrealistic.
In particular, the male characters seem to be used as narrative tools to highlight the strength and virtue of the women around them. It reinforces divisive stereotypes, perpetuating a zero-sum game where one gender must be diminished for the other to shine.
What's more concerning is that this misandrous undercurrent is symptomatic of a broader cultural shift in media. Many modern shows and films seem preoccupied with deconstructing traditional notions of masculinity, often presenting men as toxic, oppressive, or inherently flawed. This not only harms male representation but also limits the depth of female characters, who are often written as flawless, infallible, or unrealistically perfect.
This trend has real-world implications. Media, especially in the form of television and film, plays a crucial role in shaping cultural attitudes. When shows like Curfew repeatedly present men in negative, one-dimensional roles, they contribute to a skewed understanding of gender dynamics. The idea that men must be either the oppressor or the fool seeps into our collective consciousness, reinforcing harmful gender binaries and sowing division. It also alienates male viewers who feel that they are not represented fairly or sympathetically on screen.
In addition to its slow pace, Curfew ultimately suffers from a lack of balance in its gender portrayals. The overemphasis on portraying men as antagonists detracts from what could have been a more compelling exploration of its dystopian world.
If you're a self respecting man, avoid this (in my opinion)
Curfew starts with a slow, methodical approach, setting up a world where the government has imposed a curfew, ostensibly to protect women from "evil" men, which is all men (of course). While the world-building is intriguing, the show quickly becomes bogged down in its own political and social commentary. As the story unfolds, it becomes clear that the male characters in the series are painted with broad, negative strokes, a symptom of the growing trend in media that seeks to marginalize or villainize men in a misguided attempt to uplift women.
In Curfew, many of the male characters are portrayed as either villains, buffoons, or otherwise morally compromised individuals. They are often impulsive, aggressive, or driven by selfish desires, while the women are presented as morally superior, more competent, and more compassionate. The contrast is stark and, frankly, unrealistic.
In particular, the male characters seem to be used as narrative tools to highlight the strength and virtue of the women around them. It reinforces divisive stereotypes, perpetuating a zero-sum game where one gender must be diminished for the other to shine.
What's more concerning is that this misandrous undercurrent is symptomatic of a broader cultural shift in media. Many modern shows and films seem preoccupied with deconstructing traditional notions of masculinity, often presenting men as toxic, oppressive, or inherently flawed. This not only harms male representation but also limits the depth of female characters, who are often written as flawless, infallible, or unrealistically perfect.
This trend has real-world implications. Media, especially in the form of television and film, plays a crucial role in shaping cultural attitudes. When shows like Curfew repeatedly present men in negative, one-dimensional roles, they contribute to a skewed understanding of gender dynamics. The idea that men must be either the oppressor or the fool seeps into our collective consciousness, reinforcing harmful gender binaries and sowing division. It also alienates male viewers who feel that they are not represented fairly or sympathetically on screen.
In addition to its slow pace, Curfew ultimately suffers from a lack of balance in its gender portrayals. The overemphasis on portraying men as antagonists detracts from what could have been a more compelling exploration of its dystopian world.
If you're a self respecting man, avoid this (in my opinion)
This series sets out two stories that overlap:
The first being a gruesome murder. Who done it?
The second being a ludicrous idea of locking all men up from 7pm to 7am everynight whilst being monitered by an ankle tag.
Good acting and well filmed. However I do find some of the accents very harsh and grinding, whilst they murder the english language.
Obviously giving men ankle tags and locking them inside at night would not work in a democratic society such as the UK, however there are so many other reasons why this would never work and I think the series shows this.
I like programs like this that are thought provoking, before the mad politicians and fanatics come up with the idea.
One thing that I think would have been good and helpful is to highlight the abuse and murder statistics at the start of each episode. I personally have no idea.
Yes sadly there is a portion of men that need to be improsoned, monitered and watched, but I hope there are decent men walking our streets. I know a few. So in a civilised society this would not work, however this issue of violence against any innocent cannot be ignored.
Back to the drawing board!
The first being a gruesome murder. Who done it?
The second being a ludicrous idea of locking all men up from 7pm to 7am everynight whilst being monitered by an ankle tag.
Good acting and well filmed. However I do find some of the accents very harsh and grinding, whilst they murder the english language.
Obviously giving men ankle tags and locking them inside at night would not work in a democratic society such as the UK, however there are so many other reasons why this would never work and I think the series shows this.
I like programs like this that are thought provoking, before the mad politicians and fanatics come up with the idea.
One thing that I think would have been good and helpful is to highlight the abuse and murder statistics at the start of each episode. I personally have no idea.
Yes sadly there is a portion of men that need to be improsoned, monitered and watched, but I hope there are decent men walking our streets. I know a few. So in a civilised society this would not work, however this issue of violence against any innocent cannot be ignored.
Back to the drawing board!
I'm really open minded, but this show didn't make much sense to me. I only gave it a try because I like Sarah Parish, but I couldn't get past two episodes. It felt like it was made for people who don't like men at all, and there was so much misandry in it. Femcels would probably enjoy it. I don't know why they decided to create a show like this. Sarah talents could have been used elsewhere. Pure nonsense. If you think millions of men would allow this is laughable. I don't know why any man signed up to be in this show. Also, I didn't understand why they made Sarah's character so masculine when she was clearly attracted to men.
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाIn episode 4, around 20mins in, when James video calls Billy, he brings up some pictures of Helen's social media. One picture can be seen of Helen with another lady. This is Alexandra Burke's real life sister, Sheneice Burke.
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
विवरण
- रंग
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें