Who Killed Angel Adams?

A film that ended up being a beautiful disaster, is my best description of WHo Killed ANgel Adans. I mean, for a low budget film it was bad and kept me asking questions throughout the entire film, wondering who the killer was and how it actually happened. One thing I definitely like was the fact you could not see her actual face which caused me to use my imagination on what she may have looked like. Of course finding out what truly happened what was a bit interesting but the film in its entirety was worth a watch. A complete dysfunctional successful presentation, not sure if it was intentional but it definitely worked.

You will learn nothing about anything in this thing. A lot of talking circles. If you read the description, that is all you'll know when it's over. The whole show is one large silhouette, probably the director/writer, who does nothing but talks about nothing and a guy acting like a cop who is giving super secret info to some lady and doesn't want his name used so he is not exposed and then his name is blasted in this thing. Dumb! I am more stupid now than I was before watching this thing. This is awful. I do not recommend watching this and thinking it is some true crime case analysis because it is not!

Was this a true story? Clive Christopher keeps you thinking. Great who dunn it. Everyone is thinking, will there be a sequel? I want to know what happened at the large estate? Clive develops the subjects with a keen insight. Clive gives a ride through the lives of people caught up in the dark side of society. Erotic lifestyles, nightlife, drugs, and mass murder. Will Clive do it again? One can only hope. Right when you think you have it figured out another twist comes along and the whole story changes. Martin Scorses, Tim Burton, Quentin Tarantino all could rethink their style of story telling. Clive Must make more movies!