Popeye's Revenge

Popeye's Revenge opens with an animated backstory to the film's killer which looks like it has been drawn by a ten year old. And not a very talented ten year old. The slipshod nature of this introduction is a very good indication of the film's overall quality: it's cheap, amateurish garbage.

The plot, for what it's worth, sees the young Popeye bullied by his peers until he snaps and retaliates with lethal force. An angry mob pursues Popeye, leaving him for dead at the bottom of a lake. Fifteen years later, a group of friends arrive at Popeye's old home to renovate the place and come face to face with the homicidal sailor.

Borrowing from A Nightmare on Elm Street and Friday the 13th, there isn't an ounce of originality or invention in the script: it's a series of unimpressive kills, punctuated by scenes of sheer banality, most of which feature unattractive silicone-enhanced bimbos in various states of undress.

I have no problem with dumb, brainless horror in general, only when it is executed in such an uninspired fashion. Popeye is just some dude in a cheap sailor suit, and what little prosthetic make-up has been used on the actor is so poorly applied that it can be seen dangling off his face. The writers of this trash miss the opportunity to have the killer deliver amusing one-liners, the acting all round is atrocious and the characters are all thoroughly obnoxious.

The film's kills are the biggest letdown, completely lacking in creativity and devoid of cartoonish over-the-top splattery special effects. Popeye's nautical background could have resulted in some really inventive death scenes, but the obvious lack of budget means that most of the victims are simply splashed with a bit of blood. It's all very underwhelming.

I rate Popeye's Revenge 2/10.

Ahh, Popeye's Revenge. A movie that I picked up based on it's fantastic cover and gimmick of turning a beloved children's character into a sadistic murderer. But is it any good? Let's talk about it.

The movie addresses the circumstances of Popeye's birth, the tragedy of his youth and subsequent disappearance in a convenient animated sequence at the start, so the movie can chuck us straight into the sex and violence, which I appreciated.

Tara, her sad boyfriend, and a bunch of her totally unlikeable and shallow friends (who are self obsessed and/or cheating on each other) take a Twelve hour car journey to Popeye's house. Tara plans on taking advantage of the place by turning it into some kind of spooky tourist attraction. Her parents, the owners of Popeye's house via inheritance, are unaware that their daughter has decided to become an amateur entrepreneur for the weekend.

Unfortunately for Tara and her "friends", Popeye is on the loose and they're sitting ducks.

Much like the movie Alice in Murderland, one has to question why Tara would hang around with a bunch of people that she clearly has nothing in common with.

These are people who would rather look at Instagram than do any work. There's even a stereotypical outcast/stoner character called Beanie who literally NOONE likes, yet he is still there for some reason.

When the killings begin they're alright. Nothing over the top or incredible like the Terrifier movies, but they'll do. It's a shame the film didn't have more of a budget to create some really gruesome practical effects given that the whole reason we're watching is to see Popeye murder people. There was (I believe) a kill which paid homage to Zombie Flesh Eaters, which was pretty cool.

The movie doesn't outstay it's welcome at only 77 minutes long, yet the dialogue and delivery feels awkward from the irritating characters, making it hard to watch at times. I took comfort knowing that Popeye would be along shortly to murder one of them.

Popeye himself is a gigantic grinning beast of a man, impossible to take seriously but absolutely perfect in his role.

The acting talent is low, but it's acceptable for a small budget horror of this nature. Tara's dad was absolutely clueless throughout. He reminded me of Ian Beale from Eastenders. Near the end of the movie, he gets out of the car and says something like "Are you going to tell me what the hell is going on?!" to the Mother character. Like we're supposed to believe that the parents sat there in Silence during the TWELVE hour car journey to the cabin and didn't address this. Lol.

Anyway, Popeye's Revenge is certainly not a classic but it's competently made, the sets look good, and the cinematography doesn't look too amateur. Fans of trashy horror need only apply.

I'm telling you it just gives you a whole new understanding about the character. I would never look at spinach the same again in my life. WTF did I just watch? If they started having the bootleg awards, this movie definitely would win. I mean, as far as the cinematography and visuals, it was kind of interesting, don't get me wrong. But just all the way around it was just preposterous.. I don't remember none of this when I was coming up as a kid. But come to find out the same people who made this other people who made like Winnie the Pooh horror, movies, and all kinds of other stuff. What's next the jungle book?

Of course I was not expecting much of anything from this movie, as I sat down to watch it. Why? Well, seriously? Just look at the title and the contents of the movie. Doesn't exactly scream stellar entertainment. But still, on account of it being a movie that I hadn't already seen, I opted to give director William Stead's 2025 movie a fair chance.

Writer Harry Boxley didn't really put together a particular thrilling or overly entertaining script. And basing a horror movie such as this on the work of E. C. Segar just was a far stretch. Sure, I made it through the movie, but I have to say that "Popeye's Revenge" feels like it is a movie that is mostly suitable as a background movie; you know, the kind that plays while you're doing something else and only pay half an ear and eye on the movie. There isn't a proper storyline to follow, and it feels like you just watch a whimsical Popeye going from one random scene to the next, killing whomever happens to be in that scene.

I have to say that "Popeye's Revenge" comes off more as being a comedy than an actual horror movie. Why? Well, because everything was just so comically stupid and a horror movie based on the Popeye character is just silly. It just makes no sense whatsoever that the killer had to be Popeye.

The only face on the screen that I was familiar with was actress Danielle Scott. Yeah, I've seen enough shoddy low budget horror movies to be familiar with her. The acting performances in the movie were actually fair enough.

The effects in the movie were fair, but nothing extraordinary really.

The production level of the movie was actually rather good, taking into consideration the premise of the movie in general.

"Popeye's Revenge" is not a movie that I would recommend you to waste 79 minutes on watching. It just simply wasn't worth the effort. Just like the "Winnie the Pooh" horror movies, Popeye was something that never needed to be blended in with horror.

My rating of "Popeye's Revenge" lands on a generous two out of ten stars.

Popeye's Revenge is complete nonsense. Turning our childhood's spinach-loving sailor into a cheap horror figure is neither creative nor interesting. The movie tries to be scary but ends up being unintentionally funny, and its attempt at building an eerie atmosphere is so weak that even the jump scares are predictable. The script feels like it was written by an AI trained on "how to make a horror movie" and then printed out without any editing. Add in terrible CGI and awful acting, and you get a film that's nothing but a waste of time. Instead of resurrecting Popeye, they should have made a documentary about the benefits of spinach-it would've been scarier. But to be fair, it's still better than Snow White.