Happy Howlidays

I agree that the two leads took away too much from this story that otherwise had potential. The dogs were the attraction and Penny was the most likeable human. In this genre, most of the time the romantic leads start off antagonistically toward each other. Max did so a little too much. For example, I don't care how much you are trying to help someone, a man basically off the street doesn't walk into her bedroom while she shouts no, no, no, no. That is so far out of bounds it is a dealbreaker.

I can understand how a novice with dogs allows him to make a mess the first night, but any idiot would have made at least some changes before the second.

The backstories go part of the way to explain some of Mia and Max's behaviors, but don't nearly justify them. These backstories are obscured until later in the movie to the point of being a twist, at least Mia's. The viewer gets a few hints that all is not smooth at the shelter giving a slightly fresh approach to one of this genre's most common premises.

Shipping dogs, rather than people, is another fresh approach. Their antics were entertaining. And I wanted to see more of Penny. Jessica Lowndes, whom I normally love, had no chemistry with rookie actor and contest winner Ezra Moreland. This isn't that surprising that a veteran professional might not easily bond with the newcomer. This was bad enough that it was very hard to buy into the idea that they might be in love.

I think many viewers will be disappointed with the failure to capitalize on the potential here, especially when you have two likeable dogs getting so much attention. I give the movie way more stars than it probably deserves because of the dogs, Penny and some of the elements of the story.

6.1 stars.

What everyone else already said. But the actors both have screen presence. It's a weird feeling watching several bad actors in one film. It's deliberate they cast these awkward leads, for sure.

The producers see something in the male lead. He has potential, he's getting there. But yikes, he's off sometimes. Lowndes is who she is. All of her characters are generally the same. She needs help too. She creates too much tension and drama in characters, so we often get the wrong impression.

The male lead's little sister seems cool and maybe she will get more opportunities in the future. The woman who is Lowndes' character's boss and best friend is likable too. So this movie is not all bad for casting choices.

The "other" woman should have been the lead actress. She is a good actress. I am going to repeat that the male leads younger sister is actually pretty good and should have had a more prominent role.

Hallmark took an average script and made a cheap movie. You can see how inexpensive this was. There are no big city scenes or major sets or props and I'm sure the actors weren't paid much. It's a free plug for spreading the message of animal adoption and such.

Her parents seemed out of place as if they were three strangers in an uncomfortable way. We soon find out what the problem is with her character, and it's an emotional moment, but she doesn't fit the mold for who she's supposed to be. I think you'll see. I think her parents were portrayed well for the short screen time. A shame they got stuck in this dead-end story.

Why am I wasting so much time criticizing this film? All said, this movie is grossly underwhelming, but I still felt the need to finish it.

I liked the lead actor. Knowing iit was his first movie, I cut him some slack. He was actually pretty good. His character was exactly what he was - unhappy and grouchy after a bad breakup. Jessia Lowndes is as wooden as always. She seems to be awkward all the time. She is a beautiful woman, but not an actress. She is stiff and never seems invested in anything I've seen her in on Hallmark. The dogs were cute, and stole the scenes they were in together. I'd like to see Mr. Christmas with a different - less wooden - actress to see what he's got. It's hard to learn to act opposite someone who isn't very good at it - so I thought he did well for what he had to work with. He needs a seasoned actress to act with, someone more relaxed and more invested would help him loosen up and be more relaxed and invested as well. He's easy on the eyes and hope to see him again.

The storyline was cute. The dogs were cute. The male lead was not cute or compelling. While print model, Ezra Moreland's performance had flickers of authenticity, it was for the most part wooden & superficial. If he went to acting class and got some real training maybe it would help. That said, this was his first acting attempt, so he probably was anxious about his performance, but right now, he seems to be "modeling" through the role & not finding his character. Like several others, I was surprised when Ezra was given (yes, given) the Hallmark "Mr. Christmas" title over the more talented and charismatic, Hayden, who was always the stand-out; the one your eye was drawn to in every ensemble//group shot and every acting scene. Hopefully, Hallmark will rectify their original decision & sign Hayden to a contract, too.

Mia finds a dog in the rain one night so she takes to the shelter because she can't take him on. Max, the owner of the said rescue shelter rejects them. Because the world works in mysterious ways they meet again with their dogs who developed an instant attraction.

It's safe to say the dogs had more chemistry than the leads. Which is a shame. With a new face in Hallmark I was looking foward to this one but was disappointed. I'm not gonna judge Ezra because it's his first one, but maybe he should have started with a secondary role and the go from there. Like many leads nowadays did.

The plot of the movie is quite flat, maybe with other actors it could have worked. And it wasn't even necessary the Christmas factor. It could have been a summer movie.

I can't help but notice that this is the second actor to come back to Hallmark after the fail that is GAF. I just hope it ends there. And that's all I'm gonna comment about it.