Trainwreck: The Real Project X

Netflix's Trainwreck documentary series has previously covered festivals that went wrong, such as Woodstock '99 and the Astroworld tragedy. Project X, however, was not an official festival; it was a Facebook event.

It began as a birthday party for a 16-year-old girl, but the Facebook event was set to public. This regrettably enabled other users to send out invites, and thousands were sent. Faced with an unmanageable number of guests, the family cancelled it. However, the idea had already gone viral, and copycat events were quickly created on Facebook, attracting ever more attendees.

It was too late. No sooner had one event page been removed than another popped up. This was in 2012, when Facebook was still a relatively new phenomenon. There appeared to be no mechanism to contact the platform directly, and the local municipal authorities and police didn't appreciate the potential for a viral event to attract huge numbers of people. Ultimately, hundreds of thousands of invites were sent out.

I know that part of the Netherlands quite well. When people think of the Netherlands, they often picture Amsterdam's nightlife and party scene. However, much of the country, especially in the north-east, is very rural, with picturesque but sleepy small towns. They are conservative with a small 'c' and, as mentioned in the documentary, places where literally nothing happens.

The documentary draws a direct line from the 2012 American film Project X (about a high-school party that spirals into a destructive riot) to the events in Haren. The copycat Facebook events were explicitly named "Project X Haren," which primed attendees to expect chaos and a wild time.

The police, the mayor, and local authorities were simply not prepared. They took no measures to divert people, such as closing roads, and turned down an eminently sensible offer to host a party in a field just outside the town.

A lot of people turned up. Holland has an excellent railway and road network, and Haren is only a couple of hours from Amsterdam. You can get to most places in the country in under three hours, and the town is also very close to the German border.

Before 2014, the legal age to buy alcohol in the Netherlands was 16. Unfortunately, when you have a large number of young people turning up somewhere wanting to have a good time with nothing provided, it's a recipe for disaster. The police got a bit heavy-handed, and a riot ensued.

Of course, watching the show, you feel sorry for the residents and the young girl's family, but it's hard not to see the darkly comedic side of how a simple Facebook event caused thousands of partygoers to descend on a tiny Dutch town. Fortunately, unlike Astroworld, nobody died, so the programme makers were able to present the documentary with a more light-hearted tone.

They didn't get any comment from Facebook about the event, which is a notable omission. In my opinion, Facebook bears significant responsibility for allowing the event to be repeatedly republished with no apparent way for the family or authorities to get it taken down permanently. When the show finished, I said, "I hope they sent Mark Zuckerberg the bill."

This feels like another superficial attempt by this Trainwreck series to only talk to the participants of what happened, without having a deeper dive or actually any experts who were not involved included in this thing to explain how this happened.

It is extremely clear how illiterate the participants are with technology and don't have a good grasp on how tech, social networks or algorithms work, however the showrunners thought it would be best just to blame this as a human behavior problem and not a technology problem, which is how this problem started in the first place: On Facebook.

This whole event was triggered when one user made the mistake of not setting a birthday party invite to private, saw her mistake, then tried to fix it on Facebook's mobile UI but couldn't because of its limitation to edit invites, and then the FB algorithmic took control to maximize reach to as many users as possible and turned this one mistake into a huge riot.

Additionally, Meta would not remove posts which were promoting the fake event, which multiple people and government officials were saying was not a real party and would also cause major safety concerns.

None of this was discussed during the documentary, and there's appears to be no attempt by the show's producers to out to Meta for a comment. Instead, all the blame was shifted to the people involved, and not the tools or platforms they were using.

Some entitled Dutch kids shared a Facebook event invite, two loser YouTubers incited aggression in the crowd for profit (they're still proud of that cause they are still losers "it was like being in a videogame" says this 52 year old narcissist), then the kids threw some guardrails around, then some police stopped it. 90% of who they spoke to were doing a lot of superficial uptalk about this willfully moronic 5 hour street-drinking event like it was years long war-time and their golden years of achievement. I've never been less impressed by people talking about something so utterly pointless with so much pride.

Merthe planned a 16th birthday party for about seventy people at her home in the small town of Haren. Unfortunately, the Facebook invite status was set to public, not private. Project X came to Haren.

Project X, that's a film I had all but forgotten about, not really my kind of thing as I'm getting older, but I understood the urge to party; however, I did not understand the urge to cause carnage and destruction.

There was lots of interesting and shocking footage, and some of the scenes were unbelievable. One thing, though, it mentioned two deaths yet told us absolutely nothing about the two young women; that was a bit off.

Merthe came across incredibly well; what an intelligent and hugely likeable person-respect. Some of the 'people' that took part, you can imagine the kind of personality traits they have; we all know the type. The tooth, of course there had to be the tooth.

I visited Holland several times in the early 2000s; I don't remember it being a shy and retiring place that some are making it out to be; the smaller towns and villages, of course, would have been. I'd question if the cities were so quiet as was suggested.

The authorities appeared to be less than useless and Facebook played a massive part, both were to blame.

7/10.

I don't understand why society is so soft on anarchy. If we set a standard that says we won't tolerate anarchy, society will be a better place. The way to indicate that standard is serious is to debilitate offenders.

That is what should have been done in this case. Why was there no tear gas or rubber bullets? Or real bullets?

Anarchy should not be tolerated, and in this case it was well known to be a potentiality many many days in advance. Let's do better as a society.

ABOUT MY REVIEWS:

I do not include a synopsis of the film/show -- you can get that anywhere and that does not constitute a meaningful review -- but rather my thoughts and feelings on the film that hopefully will be informative to you in deciding whether to invest 90-180 minutes of your life on it.

My scale: 1-5 decreasing degrees of "terrible", with 5 being "mediocre" 6- OK. Generally held my interest OR had reasonable cast and/or cinematography, might watch it again 7 - Good. My default rating for a movie I liked enough to watch again, but didn't rise to the upper echelons 8- Very good. Would watch again and recommend to others 9- Outstanding. Would watch over and over; top 10% of my ratings 10 - A classic. (Less than 2% receive this rating). For Lifetime Movies for Chicks (LMFC), drop the above scale by 3 notches. A 6 is excellent and 7 almost unattainable.