Bradthehobbit5
सित॰ 2024 को शामिल हुए
नई प्रोफ़ाइल में आपका स्वागत है
हमारे अपडेट अभी भी डेवलप हो रहे हैं. हालांकि प्रोफ़ाइलका पिछला संस्करण अब उपलब्ध नहीं है, हम सक्रिय रूप से सुधारों पर काम कर रहे हैं, और कुछ अनुपलब्ध सुविधाएं जल्द ही वापस आ जाएंगी! उनकी वापसी के लिए हमारे साथ बने रहें। इस बीच, रेटिंग विश्लेषण अभी भी हमारे iOS और Android ऐप्स पर उपलब्ध है, जो प्रोफ़ाइल पेज पर पाया जाता है. वर्ष और शैली के अनुसार अपने रेटिंग वितरण (ओं) को देखने के लिए, कृपया हमारा नया हेल्प गाइड देखें.
बैज4
बैज कमाने का तरीका जानने के लिए, यहां बैज सहायता पेज जाएं.
रेटिंग148
Bradthehobbit5की रेटिंग
समीक्षाएं53
Bradthehobbit5की रेटिंग
Thank goodness the Jackson trilogy exists. Don't get me wrong, this film wasn't terrible, but I'm so glad this isn't all the Lord of the Rings that we got. But I'm a HUGE sucker for Lord of the Rings, so I still had a great time watching this. Its great to see where the film journey of these movies began. It does suffer in some places, but it also really shines in some others. Here are the best and worst parts of this film!
POSITIVES: My number one favorite thing about this movie is the tone. The Jackson trilogy has a very different tone for the books themselves. I feel that this film captured Tolkien's vibes better than the 2000's movies. It feels like a sit down in Autumn by a fire and watch a movie story. I got a major "Its the Great Pumpkin Charlie Brown" feel from this film, especially the first half. And I think that's what this really excels in. From the opening scene in the Shire (I wasn't too fond of the opening) till when they left Rivendell, I found myself really enjoying this film. And surprisingly, it made me want to read the books more than want to re-watch Jackson's trilogy (I did both after). The portions from Fellowship are almost, keyword almost, more book accurate than Peter Jackson's films. Not in the long run, because they skip a lot, but in the tiny things. There is still stuff missing, like Crickhollow and Tom Bombadil. But the tiny details were more from the books. The animation was (mostly good). I liked most of the character designs, but I'm used to the 2000's cast so Aragorn not having a beard has a huge turn off for me. But the blending of 2-D and 3-D looking objects for the Nazgul was cool, and the surroundings were beautifully drawn. And of course the story is amazing, because it is still the greatest fictional story ever written. In my mind, the good outways the bad, as it does for most films, but since this is my favorite story ever told, the negatives are very passionate.
NEGATIVES: As an oxymoron to what I have said previously, there as some animation I really didn't like. It was probably because of the technology offed in 78', but still, my spoiled cinematic brain really didn't enjoy it. Especially the Flight to the Ford scene. I was watching at like 11 o'clock and the janky visuals were hurting my tired brain. This wasn't the only time, but it is an example. They don't do a good job of explaining at all, which isolates the non-nerds. But honestly if you were watching this in 1978, you had read the books. And having Two Towers in it really hurts this movie. The Fellowship parts are awesome, and then they start skipping around, and miss a lot of important story threads (like Faramir). And the combat is terrible. Those were the main scenes were I was so happy for the trilogy. And also the fact that there isn't an official sequel (1980 Return of the King kinda counts, but nobody knows it exists) really hurts the ending. And finally some petty things. Where Is Aragorn's beard??? Why does Gollum sound like that?? Why is Galderiel blue?? Isn't awful, but it isn't one I'll be going back to for a while.
I heard a lot of terrible things about this film, and I enjoyed it more than I thought I would. But there are some minor things that really dragged the experiences down for me.
"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like, and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."
Farewell!
POSITIVES: My number one favorite thing about this movie is the tone. The Jackson trilogy has a very different tone for the books themselves. I feel that this film captured Tolkien's vibes better than the 2000's movies. It feels like a sit down in Autumn by a fire and watch a movie story. I got a major "Its the Great Pumpkin Charlie Brown" feel from this film, especially the first half. And I think that's what this really excels in. From the opening scene in the Shire (I wasn't too fond of the opening) till when they left Rivendell, I found myself really enjoying this film. And surprisingly, it made me want to read the books more than want to re-watch Jackson's trilogy (I did both after). The portions from Fellowship are almost, keyword almost, more book accurate than Peter Jackson's films. Not in the long run, because they skip a lot, but in the tiny things. There is still stuff missing, like Crickhollow and Tom Bombadil. But the tiny details were more from the books. The animation was (mostly good). I liked most of the character designs, but I'm used to the 2000's cast so Aragorn not having a beard has a huge turn off for me. But the blending of 2-D and 3-D looking objects for the Nazgul was cool, and the surroundings were beautifully drawn. And of course the story is amazing, because it is still the greatest fictional story ever written. In my mind, the good outways the bad, as it does for most films, but since this is my favorite story ever told, the negatives are very passionate.
NEGATIVES: As an oxymoron to what I have said previously, there as some animation I really didn't like. It was probably because of the technology offed in 78', but still, my spoiled cinematic brain really didn't enjoy it. Especially the Flight to the Ford scene. I was watching at like 11 o'clock and the janky visuals were hurting my tired brain. This wasn't the only time, but it is an example. They don't do a good job of explaining at all, which isolates the non-nerds. But honestly if you were watching this in 1978, you had read the books. And having Two Towers in it really hurts this movie. The Fellowship parts are awesome, and then they start skipping around, and miss a lot of important story threads (like Faramir). And the combat is terrible. Those were the main scenes were I was so happy for the trilogy. And also the fact that there isn't an official sequel (1980 Return of the King kinda counts, but nobody knows it exists) really hurts the ending. And finally some petty things. Where Is Aragorn's beard??? Why does Gollum sound like that?? Why is Galderiel blue?? Isn't awful, but it isn't one I'll be going back to for a while.
I heard a lot of terrible things about this film, and I enjoyed it more than I thought I would. But there are some minor things that really dragged the experiences down for me.
"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like, and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."
Farewell!
Im not a big fantastic four guy. I've never seen any of the other movies. But this one looked good, so I wanted to go see it. And gaw lee that was incredible. Here are the best and worst parts!
POSTIVES: It was just a moving film. It isn't dragged down by the lore of the other MCU movies, so it really gets its time to shine. The retro world has an absolutely amazing feel to it. Setting this in its own universe really helps it in my opinion. It also isn't really an origin. We've already had 2 orgins for these characters so I think that was a smart idea. All of the characters were very well down. Pedro Pascal does a pretty good job as Reed Richards, I just wish we got more of his stretch powers. Joseph Quinn got some amazing moments in this movie, and got to go further than his "dumb guy" cliché resulting in a very stasifying moment in the movie. The Thing deserved more screen time than what he got, but what we got of him was great. But the standout is Vanessa Kirby. She brings so much emotion and character to Sue. She really was a great fit. The story is pretty good. We got a lot more space adventure than I was expecting, which I throughly enjoyed. The space sequences really reminded me of Interstellar, which is always a win. Having the F4 be the only heros of their universe definitely added more stakes to the ending. And I love the desperate strategies they make to stop Galactuis. And the finale was amazing. There was a lot more emotion than normal finale's and the action was awsome. The nailed the Galactuis character design and voice. And the final way they stop galacticis is very staysfying. I like nothing is setup in this movie without great pay off. But the entire movie is worth it for the post credit scene. I started screaming. Overall much better than I thought it was going to be!
NEGATIVES: The beginning is really slow. It is important though, because it sets up everything that gets payed off later. The last hour definitely makes up for it though.
My expectations were blown out of the water. The sound design is BOOMING so I would definitely suggest a theater watch for this one. And you better stay for that post credit scene. It is really worth it!
"ITS CLOOBERIN' TIME!!!!"
Farewell!
POSTIVES: It was just a moving film. It isn't dragged down by the lore of the other MCU movies, so it really gets its time to shine. The retro world has an absolutely amazing feel to it. Setting this in its own universe really helps it in my opinion. It also isn't really an origin. We've already had 2 orgins for these characters so I think that was a smart idea. All of the characters were very well down. Pedro Pascal does a pretty good job as Reed Richards, I just wish we got more of his stretch powers. Joseph Quinn got some amazing moments in this movie, and got to go further than his "dumb guy" cliché resulting in a very stasifying moment in the movie. The Thing deserved more screen time than what he got, but what we got of him was great. But the standout is Vanessa Kirby. She brings so much emotion and character to Sue. She really was a great fit. The story is pretty good. We got a lot more space adventure than I was expecting, which I throughly enjoyed. The space sequences really reminded me of Interstellar, which is always a win. Having the F4 be the only heros of their universe definitely added more stakes to the ending. And I love the desperate strategies they make to stop Galactuis. And the finale was amazing. There was a lot more emotion than normal finale's and the action was awsome. The nailed the Galactuis character design and voice. And the final way they stop galacticis is very staysfying. I like nothing is setup in this movie without great pay off. But the entire movie is worth it for the post credit scene. I started screaming. Overall much better than I thought it was going to be!
NEGATIVES: The beginning is really slow. It is important though, because it sets up everything that gets payed off later. The last hour definitely makes up for it though.
My expectations were blown out of the water. The sound design is BOOMING so I would definitely suggest a theater watch for this one. And you better stay for that post credit scene. It is really worth it!
"ITS CLOOBERIN' TIME!!!!"
Farewell!
Summer time is here! You know what that means. Finding some random chain of movies to watch of course! So after Final Reckoning, I decided this years summer benge should be a Tom Cruise benge. I am at least a month into it now, which brought me to my second Spielberg film in this journey. War of the World's was a good film in my opinion. Nothing to crazy special. So I expected this movie to be all in the same. But oh my! This film is INCREDIBLE. Here are the best and worst parts.
POSTIVES: I am glad to *report* that this film is in the *minority* of Cruise films. And by that I mean, it perfectly balances humor, action, VFX, concept, execution, acting, world building, and so much more. This movie would be nothing without its official concept. The Pre-Crime concept is phenomenal, and everything that comes along with it. The initial world building is beautifully well done. Speilberg does a great job of telling us what we need to know, with still giving us room for fun reveals (I'll get there). But a great concept is nothing without execution. And the execution is extraordinary. It brings a believable, lived in cyberpunk sci-fi world that makes sense in the Pre-Crime concept. But the person who makes a lot if this movie what is, is TOM CRUISE!!! He is a great cast for the lead. He has his charisma, but also leaves he feeling his brokenness. He shows raw emotion in the Crow scene, and really makes you feel for him. Story wise this movie excels! The foreshadowing, by showing the Ann Lively murder before the main conflict even arises is perfect. And the conflict is so well done. You know Tom Cruise wants to kill the man who killed his son, so it makes you feel like you have everything figured out. But you definitely do not. Because the twist in this thing is crazy. I didn't see it coming at all, because the paint it in such a different way. Colin Farell was a great antagonist for the first part. I can't say everything that made tgis movie so incredible so go watch it for yourself!
NEGATIVES: There's really nothing other than some dumb technology (eyeball removing). So why didn't it achieve 10 stars you are asking? Because 10/10 is reserved for cinema changing films, that there is never a question about it being the best. So 9.8/10 so not quite there yet. But maybe on a rewatch!
Go watch this movie for yourself. It really is worth it. Even if you aren't a Cruise fan, it has a great concept and story. And if you are a Cruise fan you'll have a blast like me. Im glad to have found a new addition to my top 10 list!
"Everybody runs."
Farewell!
POSTIVES: I am glad to *report* that this film is in the *minority* of Cruise films. And by that I mean, it perfectly balances humor, action, VFX, concept, execution, acting, world building, and so much more. This movie would be nothing without its official concept. The Pre-Crime concept is phenomenal, and everything that comes along with it. The initial world building is beautifully well done. Speilberg does a great job of telling us what we need to know, with still giving us room for fun reveals (I'll get there). But a great concept is nothing without execution. And the execution is extraordinary. It brings a believable, lived in cyberpunk sci-fi world that makes sense in the Pre-Crime concept. But the person who makes a lot if this movie what is, is TOM CRUISE!!! He is a great cast for the lead. He has his charisma, but also leaves he feeling his brokenness. He shows raw emotion in the Crow scene, and really makes you feel for him. Story wise this movie excels! The foreshadowing, by showing the Ann Lively murder before the main conflict even arises is perfect. And the conflict is so well done. You know Tom Cruise wants to kill the man who killed his son, so it makes you feel like you have everything figured out. But you definitely do not. Because the twist in this thing is crazy. I didn't see it coming at all, because the paint it in such a different way. Colin Farell was a great antagonist for the first part. I can't say everything that made tgis movie so incredible so go watch it for yourself!
NEGATIVES: There's really nothing other than some dumb technology (eyeball removing). So why didn't it achieve 10 stars you are asking? Because 10/10 is reserved for cinema changing films, that there is never a question about it being the best. So 9.8/10 so not quite there yet. But maybe on a rewatch!
Go watch this movie for yourself. It really is worth it. Even if you aren't a Cruise fan, it has a great concept and story. And if you are a Cruise fan you'll have a blast like me. Im glad to have found a new addition to my top 10 list!
"Everybody runs."
Farewell!
