amits-998
जुल॰ 2025 को शामिल हुए
नई प्रोफ़ाइल में आपका स्वागत है
हमारे अपडेट अभी भी डेवलप हो रहे हैं. हालांकि प्रोफ़ाइलका पिछला संस्करण अब उपलब्ध नहीं है, हम सक्रिय रूप से सुधारों पर काम कर रहे हैं, और कुछ अनुपलब्ध सुविधाएं जल्द ही वापस आ जाएंगी! उनकी वापसी के लिए हमारे साथ बने रहें। इस बीच, रेटिंग विश्लेषण अभी भी हमारे iOS और Android ऐप्स पर उपलब्ध है, जो प्रोफ़ाइल पेज पर पाया जाता है. वर्ष और शैली के अनुसार अपने रेटिंग वितरण (ओं) को देखने के लिए, कृपया हमारा नया हेल्प गाइड देखें.
बैज2
बैज कमाने का तरीका जानने के लिए, यहां बैज सहायता पेज जाएं.
रेटिंग3
amits-998की रेटिंग
समीक्षाएं2
amits-998की रेटिंग
One of the most well researched documentaries on this controversial double murder case.
The team has gone to great length to cover all aspects of the case including reaching out to present location of key figures in the case, getting experts to analyze footage, body languages, etc. Once you go over it, you understand why the botched investigation and personal bias by the investigating teams (and fuelled by media wars), resulted in a case which might bever actually be solved, even if we may find a culprit(s), we may never be able to convict him(them).
A great job and how I wish our investigators had put in as much effort.
The team has gone to great length to cover all aspects of the case including reaching out to present location of key figures in the case, getting experts to analyze footage, body languages, etc. Once you go over it, you understand why the botched investigation and personal bias by the investigating teams (and fuelled by media wars), resulted in a case which might bever actually be solved, even if we may find a culprit(s), we may never be able to convict him(them).
A great job and how I wish our investigators had put in as much effort.
The documentary falls way below expectations due tobseceral factors.
Like the police investigation and the 2 cbi teams, this documentary falters, not because it does not present facts, but because it selectively presents facts which suit the narrative which indicates a clear bias.
Without divulging the details, I would mention that the director has decided on his version of truth, which might be prejudiced by his assistants, because of his being a foreigner to the case.
A clear proof is how the typographic error (which the high court has sounded as a key evidence being likely forged in its judgement), has been just mentioned as a side note.
I would suggest viewers to watch beyond reasonable doubt - a CNA documentsry on the same subject, for a more thoroigh understanding of the case.
Like the police investigation and the 2 cbi teams, this documentary falters, not because it does not present facts, but because it selectively presents facts which suit the narrative which indicates a clear bias.
Without divulging the details, I would mention that the director has decided on his version of truth, which might be prejudiced by his assistants, because of his being a foreigner to the case.
A clear proof is how the typographic error (which the high court has sounded as a key evidence being likely forged in its judgement), has been just mentioned as a side note.
I would suggest viewers to watch beyond reasonable doubt - a CNA documentsry on the same subject, for a more thoroigh understanding of the case.