VALUTAZIONE IMDb
6,8/10
18.454
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Tratto dal libro "The Little Broomstick" di Mary Stewart, narra la storia di uno strano fiore che conferisce poteri magici a una ragazza.Tratto dal libro "The Little Broomstick" di Mary Stewart, narra la storia di uno strano fiore che conferisce poteri magici a una ragazza.Tratto dal libro "The Little Broomstick" di Mary Stewart, narra la storia di uno strano fiore che conferisce poteri magici a una ragazza.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
- Premi
- 8 candidature totali
Hana Sugisaki
- Mary
- (voce)
Ryûnosuke Kamiki
- Peter
- (Japanese version)
- (voce)
Fumiyo Kohinata
- Doctor Dee
- (Japanese version)
- (voce)
Ken'ichi Endô
- Zebedee
- (voce)
Eri Watanabe
- Miss Banks
- (voce)
Ikue Ôtani
- Tib
- (voce)
Ruby Barnhill
- Mary
- (English version)
- (voce)
Kate Winslet
- Madam Mumblechook
- (English version)
- (voce)
Jim Broadbent
- Doctor Dee
- (English version)
- (voce)
Ewen Bremner
- Flanagan
- (English version)
- (voce)
Lynda Baron
- Great-Aunt Charlotte
- (English version)
- (voce)
Louis Ashbourne Serkis
- Peter
- (English version)
- (voce)
Morwenna Banks
- Miss Banks
- (English version)
- (voce)
Recensioni in evidenza
These reviews here lead me to believe the movie was going to be boring or something. It's entertaining the entire way through. Best movie I've seen in the cinema in over a year.
Sure it's not as good as Spirited Away, but that was rated as the best animated film of the 2000s so of course it's going to be hard to beat.
The soundtrack in this film is great, lots of recurring themes in the right times. The animation is lush and looks like it came from Ghibli. I really don't see why anyone wouldn't like this movie, it was really good.
Go see it for yourself, don't listen to the reviews. The story was good, the animation was good, the sound was good.
Sure it's not as good as Spirited Away, but that was rated as the best animated film of the 2000s so of course it's going to be hard to beat.
The soundtrack in this film is great, lots of recurring themes in the right times. The animation is lush and looks like it came from Ghibli. I really don't see why anyone wouldn't like this movie, it was really good.
Go see it for yourself, don't listen to the reviews. The story was good, the animation was good, the sound was good.
Didn't look into this film deeply enough to find out it's not a "real" Ghibli, and that didn't impede upon my watch. The animation is beautiful, the characters are visually unique and fun, and the story and setting held my attention the full length of the film. My only complaint would be that this is definitely a movie for kids, and there wasn't any complexity or depth that would make me keen to rewatch this several times. Still a good watch, and one I'd definitely recommend!
A lot of of low rated reviews based on the film being a Ghibli rip off, but it was created by many of THE SAME ANIMATORS from Ghibli so it is to be expected to be similar.
Anyway the film was decent, visually stunning great soundtrack and very creative. Could have been a better story and better character development but it's based on a book anyway so they couldn't really help that.
Looking forward to seeing more films from Studio Ponoc, they seem to have picked up from where Hayao Miyazaki left off.
Worth a watch.
Anyway the film was decent, visually stunning great soundtrack and very creative. Could have been a better story and better character development but it's based on a book anyway so they couldn't really help that.
Looking forward to seeing more films from Studio Ponoc, they seem to have picked up from where Hayao Miyazaki left off.
Worth a watch.
Just came back from the one time only screening of this movie in Austin TX. I'm a bit confused by the super-negative reviews of this film. I guess people were expecting a film on par with past Studio Ghibli movies? Lets be real here, as sad as it is, the age of Studio Ghibli is over, unless Hayao Miyazaki decides to return to the directors seat and make another full-length feature film. Which at this point seems unlikely. The fact that we have a studio like Ponoc to carry on the torch of 2D animated projects in the style of Gibli should be celebrated I think.
I went into this movie not expecting it to be on par with any of Studio Ghibli's past works, yes it's no Howl's Moving Castle or Spirited Away. I did enjoy Mary and the Witch's Flower more so than Miyazaki's last two films, The Wind Rises and Ponyo. The only other Hiromasa Yonebayashi films I've seen was Arriety, never saw When Marine Was There. I do think this film is better than Arriety was.
Mary and the Witches Flower looks like a Studio Ghibli film, the character animation is really great, the backgrounds, while reminiscent of past Ghibli works are nice, but not on the same level of detail, which was fine to me. The characters and the story is good, again, not as solid as past Ghibli works, but I enjoyed it overall. The biggest thing lacking to be was a musical score from Joe Hisaishi, but he has never done music for a Hiromasa Yonebayashi film. The last film he composed music for was The Princess Kaguya, which was a big deal.
I'm getting off-track here, but the last I will say is that is if you are a fan of Studio Ghibli, and are yearning to see a full-length feature film in traditional 2D animation, go see this film if you are able to, just don't go in expecting it to be as good as one of the Studio Ghibli classics.
I went into this movie not expecting it to be on par with any of Studio Ghibli's past works, yes it's no Howl's Moving Castle or Spirited Away. I did enjoy Mary and the Witch's Flower more so than Miyazaki's last two films, The Wind Rises and Ponyo. The only other Hiromasa Yonebayashi films I've seen was Arriety, never saw When Marine Was There. I do think this film is better than Arriety was.
Mary and the Witches Flower looks like a Studio Ghibli film, the character animation is really great, the backgrounds, while reminiscent of past Ghibli works are nice, but not on the same level of detail, which was fine to me. The characters and the story is good, again, not as solid as past Ghibli works, but I enjoyed it overall. The biggest thing lacking to be was a musical score from Joe Hisaishi, but he has never done music for a Hiromasa Yonebayashi film. The last film he composed music for was The Princess Kaguya, which was a big deal.
I'm getting off-track here, but the last I will say is that is if you are a fan of Studio Ghibli, and are yearning to see a full-length feature film in traditional 2D animation, go see this film if you are able to, just don't go in expecting it to be as good as one of the Studio Ghibli classics.
Studio Ponoc, heir apparent to Studio Ghibli, makes a decent start with Mary & the Witch's Flower.
Animation is lush and gorgeous to look at, and is very reminiscent of the work we're used to from Studio Ghibli - and as anyone who's familiar with Ghibli's work can tell you, that is a pretty high bar to meet. I saw the English dubbed version, and the voice acting was excellent as well - especially Ruby Barnhill as Mary. Background score was quite good too.
Story, however, was a bit disappointing. Not saying that it was bad, it just felt a bit devoid of heart and there were quite a few plot holes which were hard to overlook. Character motivations were hard to explain, and the wizarding world Mary stumbles into feels empty, though it is supposed to be a thriving world. Then again, I complain because I was expecting something of Ghibli standards.
It was a fun movie to experience, and I'm glad Studio Ponoc exists - not only because I expect bigger and better things from them in the future, but also because something as beautiful as the tradition of Ghibli animated movies needs be kept alive.
7/10
Animation is lush and gorgeous to look at, and is very reminiscent of the work we're used to from Studio Ghibli - and as anyone who's familiar with Ghibli's work can tell you, that is a pretty high bar to meet. I saw the English dubbed version, and the voice acting was excellent as well - especially Ruby Barnhill as Mary. Background score was quite good too.
Story, however, was a bit disappointing. Not saying that it was bad, it just felt a bit devoid of heart and there were quite a few plot holes which were hard to overlook. Character motivations were hard to explain, and the wizarding world Mary stumbles into feels empty, though it is supposed to be a thriving world. Then again, I complain because I was expecting something of Ghibli standards.
It was a fun movie to experience, and I'm glad Studio Ponoc exists - not only because I expect bigger and better things from them in the future, but also because something as beautiful as the tradition of Ghibli animated movies needs be kept alive.
7/10
Lo sapevi?
- QuizThe debut film of Studio Ponoc.
- BlooperIt is set in England, but the girl rehearsing arriving at her new but ordinary school bows to the teacher. Maybe normal in Japan, but not in modern Britain.
- ConnessioniFeatured in Chris Stuckmann Movie Reviews: Mary and the Witch's Flower (2018)
- Colonne sonoreRAIN
Music by Shin'ichi Nakajima (as Nakajin), Saori Fujisaki (as Saori) and Satoshi Fukase (as Fukase)
Lyrics by Saori Fujisaki (as Saori) and Satoshi Fukase (as Fukase)
Performed by Sekai no Owari (as SEKAI NO OWARI)
Courtesy of Toy's Factory
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is Mary and the Witch's Flower?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paese di origine
- Siti ufficiali
- Lingua
- Celebre anche come
- Mary and the Witch's Flower
- Aziende produttrici
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
Botteghino
- Lordo Stati Uniti e Canada
- 2.418.404 USD
- Fine settimana di apertura Stati Uniti e Canada
- 348.475 USD
- 21 gen 2018
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 42.170.708 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione
- 1h 43min(103 min)
- Colore
- Mix di suoni
- Proporzioni
- 1.85 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti