Red Forrest

Don't waste your time. Acting, horrible, story horrible. I'm still trying to figure out what the Knights Templar are doing fighting Indians in the old west. Wrong century dude! As a reviewer stated earlier, someone must have a lot of friends for a 9.6 rating. False ratings do more harm than good in the long run.

I am going to give my honest opinion I think the movie was good considering a lot of factors. Got an email from a really good friend the other day asking anyone with an IMdB account to please watch the feature and review the movie also on Amazon. Or start an account or even start a prime membership and cancel to watch the film and get the actors paid.

I think this is the first use of IR photography in any horror film. Saw the other reviews and feel they are nonsense. There are so many bad movies out there and this is not one of them. Hell even checked a few of these guys out seems like trolls. All bad reviews come on guys!! It isn't great by any means but it is good. I got to say any indie filmmaker is going to have to work with what was given.

In the email I did see the budget they worked with, and going back in forth with my buddy who knows the guys doing it told me of all the problems they encountered. So I am giving it 8/10 stars. I think with no money in the budget and giving a percent to all actors, crew, and people involved deserves some recognition. I am going to check out a few other titles some friends told me about, and give a review on those and hopefully take nights and weekends to start working on doing some reviews for some indie filmmakers.

To the other reviewers saying how did they get stars or reviews? I guess I am proof they have ask thousands of people to give an honest review and even took time to to respond to my questions about how they even pulled off a film like this with no budget. So there you go I hope a few others right in that got the email request to do a review, instead of taking the easy road and just giving a quick pick rating. A quick pick rating doesn't help anyone out people should take some time and do a quick review!!

Read a review here that said "the acting wasn't bad". In what planet? Modern day people acting mostly okay. People from the early 1500's acting beyond laughable. Or to put it mildly extremely lousy! Among my favorites was the guy with a deep southern accent playing a person from Spain. So why the high review, laughed through most of the movie, especially when the devil was talking to the priest.

From some of the review comments I read, I was expecting a real dog of a movie. The truth is, the plot left something to be desired, but the acting wasn't bad, the dialog flowed well, and the camera work was smooth. The story itself was interesting, but I couldn't figure out the 'family dynamics' and I thought the 'dad' character was a bit of an a-hole. In all, I'd watch more from this group. I was not solicited to provide a review. I'm just a regular guy throwing in his two cents.

This review does not contain spoilers: This movie is so bad that nothing can spoil it .

When I started watching it this movie had rating 8.0. I am sure it's going to drop dramatically. Someone manipulating the rating.

Don't wait your time! There is nothing to see there. Looks like movie was filmed in 1 take, because acting is so horrible, that I can't believe this is the best actors can do after multiple attempts.

Only thing is good about this movie is that there are no plot holes, but that because there is no plot what's so ever.