Labbra proibite

Constance Bennett brings vim and vigor to this soppy story of maternal longings. In Bennett's most recent hit movie, What Price Hollywood, she said, "I can't have a baby in every picture", but in that film, and in Rockabye, no kidding, there's a baby. In Bennett's private life, as all fan mag readers knew, between marriages Bennett had adopted a baby and was raising it as a single, working mom. This was unusual in 1932, but as fan mag readers also knew, Bennett did as she pleased. In Rockabye, Bennett, a celebrated Hollywood star with an adopted baby, plays Judy, a celebrated stage star adopting a baby. A case of art imitating life. Did Bennett's femme fan base vicariously see themselves in Bennett's character, a lone woman with child? Not likely, as Judy did not struggle alone to raise an adorable tyke but had multiple hands assisting - namely a nanny, nurse, governess, cook, and her own mother, plus a male presence in the person of her doting manager. Did Bennett's femme fan base wonder why Bennett didn't marry first and then pursue motherhood? Did the adoption agency wonder? Did audiences wonder why Bennett, at the peak of her Star Power, insisted on making this never produced and unproducible play?

Bennett is fabulous and gives a wonderful and lively performance. In films prior to What Price Hollywood Bennett was passive, even lethargic. In Rockabye she kicks up her heels, sings in a speakeasy with the pals of her youth, gets frisky with scrambled eggs and balloons, and has a rollicking good time with her new love. I suspect Bennett was playing herself, a free-spirit who thumbed her nose at conventions. Bennett too is believable in the script's hard-to-swallow scenes of sorrow and sacrifice. Variety's reviewer wrote, "This actress is one of the few who can somehow achieve conviction in just such stagey things" and "She is accountable for practically all its merits."

How did the public respond to Rockabye? After the opening in New York, Variety predicted it would do well, as all Bennett films had done. Bennett's biographer wrote that it was a colossal box-office flop. TCM wrote that RKO records showed it was a respectable hit and grossed slightly more than the very successful What Price Hollywood. So it was a flop and a hit? Maybe it was both. After a disastrous preview of Rockabye, the film was remade with a new director and costars. This would have doubled production costs and resulted in a loss, regardless of grosses. RKO then wised up - in future, no more babies.

10 stars for Bennett. 0 stars for story.

Rockabye is both the title of this film and the title of a play that society writer Joel McCrea wants Constance Bennett to star in. She's a hit in the play, the movie left a bit to be desired.

This movie is strictly Connie's show and she has three men panting after her. First is Walter Pidgeon who is a political fixer of sorts who is on trial for bribery. Her relationship with him causes her to be subpoenaed as a witness by District Attorney Charles Middleton. Though Pidgeon is acquitted both their reputations have suffered. As a result the baby she has adopted is taken from here by the blue noses who run the Bureau of Child Welfare. What this crowd might have done with Angelina Jolie or Madonna today is something to contemplate.

Her second man is agent Paul Lukas who suggests a nice long European trip till the scandal talk dies down which she does and where she meets McCrea. His character seems to be based on that real society playwright George Kelly, uncle of Grace. He writes a play that proves to be her biggest hit.

Connie's lucky in her career on stage, but singularly unlucky in love. The rest of Rockabye will show that should one care to view it.

Bennett and McCrea were a screen team of sorts doing four films including this one in the early Thirties. According to Tony Thomas in the films of Joel McCrea and THE authority on such matters Robert Osborne, the film was originally shot with Phillips Holmes in Joel's role, but Connie got George Cukor the director to re-shoot her scenes with McCrea. Personally in this somewhat maudlin film I think that Phillips Holmes might have been done the real favor.

George Cukor who usually had such a good touch in these 'women's' pictures went off the mark in this early work of his.

I believe this is the earliest Joel McCrea film I've seen thus far, though I am familiar with many of hislater films. By contract, I just discovered Constance Bennett this weekend, watching as I am all her Summer Under The Stars films featured on TCM.

I can now say without reservation that the charm-o-meter pointed entirely in McCrea's direction. He's ridiculously good-looking and has exquisite physical movement. Bennett, while not exactly a dog's behind like, say, Bette Davis, has no s3x appeal, no zip, no nothing. She's just a doll playing dressup. Maybe Depression-Era audiences were thrilled to see her change outfits every scene. Snoozerama for me.

There is one interesting pre-Code scene in the kitchen. Bennett slaps McCrea suggestively. McCrea gives her a playful shove back. They do this a couple more times. All thetime smiling. It's pretty clear what they were going for here. But that's where the thrills end.

When you are told that you must "do the right thing", who is the one that determines what the "right thing" is? If it affects your future happiness, shouldn't you be allowed to be the judge?? That is the moral question asked in this film and it holds up well today.

The film is worth watching for Constance Bennett alone. She is natural and plays the part perfectly. Joel McCrea is always charming and allows her to shine in each of her scenes by giving Bennett exactly the acting support she needs.

McCrea is a playwright who has written a play about a woman's quest to adopt a baby. It offers the leading role to Bennett, but he does not realize how much the play parallels her actual life. It is hinted at that the child she is seeking to adopt is her love child, but it is not certain that is the fact. McCrea is married and about to be divorced and free. They fall in love and she sees a future with him and their own children.

All seems so happy, but McCrea has an issue from his past that forces Bennett to make a life changing decision. I won't spoil the climax, but it is a good one and Bennett acts her role perfectly.

The film is "good" but it is made "great" because of Constance Bennett. She turns this into a Classy Classic!

This enchanting 1933 movie's series of remarkable moments -- a courtroom trial where a blonde Broadway actress actually defends a former "friend;" realistic playtime with a darling little girl; exuberance in a speakeasy, with old chums; a joyously funny, sexy scene in a kitchen; and much more -- are simply delightful. The plot doesn't do justice to the energy and excitement generated by Constance Bennett, Joel MacCrea, Paul Lukas and many others... she's a "Gashouse" neighborhood girl who has made herself into a lady, an actress who searches for love through family, children, travel, a new man, her work, etc., and he's an old-money college-boy playwright with a strong social conscience. And her agent loves her... But see the movie for its pleasures and overlook the occasional creakiness -- it's an unexpected treasure.