VALUTAZIONE IMDb
5,1/10
655
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Un piccolo gruppo di scienziati britannici strettamente sorvegliati, testa il loro primo razzo tra indicazioni di conflitti matrimoniali nella comunità.Un piccolo gruppo di scienziati britannici strettamente sorvegliati, testa il loro primo razzo tra indicazioni di conflitti matrimoniali nella comunità.Un piccolo gruppo di scienziati britannici strettamente sorvegliati, testa il loro primo razzo tra indicazioni di conflitti matrimoniali nella comunità.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
Leo Phillips
- Sergeant Peterson
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Marianne Stone
- Mrs. Rogers
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Jean Webster-Brough
- Mrs. Daniels
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Recensioni in evidenza
Much more of a melodrama murder mystery, and a not very good one, than a Sci-Fi film so a bit of a let down, it's no surprise that it was received poorly at the time of release. Eva Bartok is as always a great watch as she was a classic beauty and really suited the hair style she had in this. The interior of the space ship was impressively large especially when compared to the very cramped Apollo mission capsules. How they survived the g forces on take off while sitting on an office chair was a mystery.
Not really worth watching especially by Sci-Fi fans as not much happens Sci-Fi wise, best to skip it.
Not really worth watching especially by Sci-Fi fans as not much happens Sci-Fi wise, best to skip it.
Despite the disclaimers from both the director and producer, this is a fairly entertaining little movie. True, the space stuff struck me as dated, dull and not particularly interesting (aside from a shipboard explosion which is very deftly contrived), and the action is further handicapped by the colorless presence of Eva Bartok who, aside from her very last scene, does little to engage the viewer's attention. Admittedly, the script is weak in this respect and often gave me the feeling the heroine's role had been needlessly expanded simply to give Miss Bartok more screen time.
However, once the murder sub-plot rears its head and the talented Alan Wheatley makes his presence felt, interest picks up considerably. Andrew Osborn and Cecile Chevreau also deliver charismatic portrayals which help to counterbalance disappointing characterizations by Michael Medwin and (to a lesser extent) Philip Leaver. As for the hero, Howard Duff seems adequate enough, though he doesn't really pull a great deal of weight.
I must admit that, despite his cult following, I've never regarded Terence Fisher as one of the giants of the British film industry, but I thought he actually handled parts of this movie with a fair amount of savvy. Wheatley's scenes are directed (and edited) at a such an agreeably smart pace, one wishes that the Duff-Bartok-Medwin episodes were handled with at least an equal degree of expedition and dispatch.
And, despite the tight budget, I thought production values were more than adequate by "B"-picture standards.
So, all in all, I disagree with the claims of both producer Carreras and director Fisher that Spaceways has little or nothing to offer.
However, once the murder sub-plot rears its head and the talented Alan Wheatley makes his presence felt, interest picks up considerably. Andrew Osborn and Cecile Chevreau also deliver charismatic portrayals which help to counterbalance disappointing characterizations by Michael Medwin and (to a lesser extent) Philip Leaver. As for the hero, Howard Duff seems adequate enough, though he doesn't really pull a great deal of weight.
I must admit that, despite his cult following, I've never regarded Terence Fisher as one of the giants of the British film industry, but I thought he actually handled parts of this movie with a fair amount of savvy. Wheatley's scenes are directed (and edited) at a such an agreeably smart pace, one wishes that the Duff-Bartok-Medwin episodes were handled with at least an equal degree of expedition and dispatch.
And, despite the tight budget, I thought production values were more than adequate by "B"-picture standards.
So, all in all, I disagree with the claims of both producer Carreras and director Fisher that Spaceways has little or nothing to offer.
I like Spaceways, but it is a pretty average movie on all fronts (for the fifties). Even though it does have the lovely Eva Bartok in it, and was directed by Hammer Film's legendary Terence Fisher, the film's main problem is that it can't decide what type of genre film it is, with all the various story elements running around. We've got a early British science fiction (hence the title, of course), a murder mystery, and a bit of early Cold War thriller all tumbled together.
The performances by all are solid if stereotypical, but the effects consist primarily of using the same stock footage of V-2 experiments that viewers would come to know and sometimes loathe in many movies later on (Fire Maidens From Outer Space, King Dinosaur, etc., etc.). The movie also seems to end a bit abruptly.
Luckily, the DVD of the movie is available at mall music/video stores for about $6 (I got my in a double pack with Kronos for $10), so it is at least affordable for the 50's Sci-Fi Completest out there.
The performances by all are solid if stereotypical, but the effects consist primarily of using the same stock footage of V-2 experiments that viewers would come to know and sometimes loathe in many movies later on (Fire Maidens From Outer Space, King Dinosaur, etc., etc.). The movie also seems to end a bit abruptly.
Luckily, the DVD of the movie is available at mall music/video stores for about $6 (I got my in a double pack with Kronos for $10), so it is at least affordable for the 50's Sci-Fi Completest out there.
This movie was a lot better than I expected.While it was another short movie with extended periods of nothing and the plot wasn't the greatest, the acting is above average and the movie isn't boring.They do a good job of covering the bases and making sure there are no plot holes but the plot is so average that it doesn't help that much.A scientist is accused of killing his wife and another man and putting them in a rocket and sending it into space.Instead of telling them to look for the those people, he just jumps in a rocket to go get the other rocket and prove they aren't in it.The best thing about the movie is that their space program is realistic, it doesn't work.Four stars, give it a shot.
Many reviewers have unfairly criticised this film for lack of accuracy in the space portion of this yarn. Well, in 1953 we knew very little about space, so that must be forgiven.
As so little was known about space in those days, the writers had to fill out a good proportion of the film with a fairly standard love/mystery story, including a nice little plot twist.
I enjoyed this film as it had good performances from all the actors. It's definitely worth a view.
As so little was known about space in those days, the writers had to fill out a good proportion of the film with a fairly standard love/mystery story, including a nice little plot twist.
I enjoyed this film as it had good performances from all the actors. It's definitely worth a view.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizPrincipal photography on Spaceways took place at Bray Studios, Windsor, England from mid-November 1952 to early January 1953.[1] Some of the scenes of the spaceship taking off were special effects shots taken from the Lippert film, Rocketship X-M (1950).
- BlooperAt the beginning of the movie, when Howard Duff exits the van inside the base, the whole filming crew is reflected against the side of the van.
- ConnessioniEdited from Destinazione Luna (1950)
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is Spaceways?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
- Tempo di esecuzione
- 1h 16min(76 min)
- Colore
- Mix di suoni
- Proporzioni
- 1.37 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti