Tokio Joe

Several years ago I stumbled upon a 35 cent biography of Humphrey Bogart written shortly after his death. In it he comments on many of his films, including Tokyo Joe. "Utterly worthless picture" he noted. Many critics agree as they dismiss this piece of hokum about what happens when a former soldier returns to what was his "home town" before the war. Thing have changed. It is not the paradise it once was to him and it is certainly no "Rick's" Instead of "As Time Goes By" we hear "These Foolish Things," a better song but not nearly as famous.

Tokyo Joe was made not long after Bogey had left Warner Brothers and it has more than a whiff of a "message picture" that strikes to find some meaning in postwar Tokyo. But like "House Of Bamboo" this film works not only as melodrama but as historical artifact of a period that is now forgotten. We don't think of the Japanese as a defeated power. Ever since the Honda Accord and the Toyota Camry started blowing away American competition we have thought of the Japanese as a superpower economically, not as a crippled defeated country. This film captures a mood that is rarely expressed in movies and it captures it with rather high production values. The rest of the cast isn't much but they play it straight and thus Tokyo Joe stands up even better after the initial viewing. The DVD transfer is very good and it remains a worthy addition to the Bogart canon.

"Tokyo Joe" from 1949 was the first film that was allowed to film in post-war Japan. Produced by Bogart's Santana Productions, it's just fair.

Bogart plays Joe Barrett, who returns to Japan after the war to start a business. While there, he discovers that his wife Trina (Florence Marly) is still alive. However, when he finds her, he discovers that she has divorced him and remarried a man named Mark Landis (Alexander Knox). Joe is determined to get her back and needs to extend his visa; he is approached by Baron Kimura (Sessue Hayakawa) who wants him to front an airline freight company for him. He would be importing frozen frogs. However, there is some additional freight, and for that, Kimura blackmails Joe by telling him what Trina was involved in during the war, which he will make public if Joe doesn't work with him.

This film bears a passing resemblance to Casablanca, and Bogart is clearly going through a transition which would lead to some of his greatest films and performances in the '50s. Rick of Casablanca is clearly pretty tired out. Being a small company, Santana Productions did not make big films or hire actors equal to Bogart, so the effect here is mediocre.

Florence Marly as Trina is a disaster - cold, very haughty looking, without much acting ability. It's impossible to see why Joe fell for her in the first place. She is no Ilse Lund, and she has no chemistry with Bogart. Her intentions are very unclear as well - as an actress, it doesn't look like she made any decisions about the character. Alexander Knox and Sessue Hayakawa are very good. Bogart, for my money, is always terrific.

Definitely worth seeing for the Japanese location and for Bogart. It's not horrendous, but considering that Bogart starred in so many classic films, it's not that good.

Did like the idea for the story, not an original concept but an intriguing one. Tokyo is a lovely location and an inspired and interesting one for this kind of film. The main reason for seeing the film was for me Humphrey Bogart, one of the best actors at that time (especially in the hard-edged kind of roles that require intensity) and it's most evident in one of the finest and most iconic screen performances there's ever been as Rick Blaine in the timeless 'Casablanca'.

'Tokyo Joe' is not one of Bogart's best though. If anything it's somewhere in the weaker end. Bogart himself is one of the best things about it actually and the main reason for anybody to see it, and some of the supporting cast are good. The problems were the female lead, the script, some of the story and direction, all of which heavily flawed. All of that will be elaborated upon soon. 'Tokyo Joe' is a long way from a bad film, but considering how interesting the story sounded and how good an actor Bogart was it could have been a lot more.

Good things are quite a lot. The best thing about it is Bogart, who brings his usual authority and hard-boiled intensity to a role that suits him perfectly. Also good are an appealing Alexander Knox and especially a sinister Sessue Hayakawa (Kimura is one formidable threat). Lora Lee Michel is cute without being overly so and her chemistry with Bogart is touching.

It is a stylishly and atmospherically photographed film too, the production values in general had an authentic grit. The first half an hour was very intriguing but it was the last twenty minutes and the climax where the film hit its stride and became exciting and had the edge that was missing in the middle. There is some intriguing scripting early on and when the film comes alive finally. Suitably ominous music from George Anthell as well.

Florence Marly however brings things down significantly, her performance isn't just bland and uncharismatic. At its worst, it was pretty inept. There is no chemistry between her and Bogart, which always looked awkward and distant, and her character is pretty sketchy. The rest of the supporting cast other than those already mentioned are fairly forgettable in come and go roles. The direction had its moments towards the end, but is generally undistinguished and doesn't bring out enough of the tension needed for such a story.

While not without its moments, the script could have been tighter on the whole with it tending to be bogged down by talk of the waffling kind. It could have done with more edge and purpose. The story starts off well and ends even better but what happens in between is rather derivative, with no real surprises, and at times drawn out when the story is especially thin. Some of the rear projection is obvious in a somewhat phony way.

Overall, decent but could have been a lot more. 5.5/10 (was very conflicted on what rating to give between the two)

This could have been a great movie. Post World War II location movies have an intriguing atmosphere. Post-war Japan offered a terrific setting, but the obvious backlot location, with cheesy process shots trying to pass for a Japanese location, ruins the effect.

Alexander Knox is great, sardonic but principled, and Sessue Hayakawa is deliciously malign. Florence Marly is a poor substitute for Lisbeth Scott -- or couldn't Bogey get his own wife Lauren Bacall to work for scale? Bogey himself looks a little shopworn. Even the love child is fat-faced and unappealing.

Compromise pervades the film, from the cardboard sets to the hack director. Because it was cheap, exterior shots were minimal, and so the action scenes, which could have made for a more exciting story, give way to lots of talky interior stuff.

As the studio system weakened, star-owned production companies, like Bogart's, Burt Lancaster's and Alan Ladd's, were in vogue. Stars can't resist the chance to star in a movie where they don't have to take direction, so they often hire weak directors, usually with dismal results. This is one of them.

Humphrey Bogart's lesser watched films are so often passed by because the standard for Bogart films is so incredibly high. Is this film as great as "To Have and Have Not"? No it isn't. On the other hand I guarantee you it is more sophisticated and interesting to watch than 90% of the films that came out last year.

People often seem to over look the unique virtues of this film as an interesting film in history. Coming so shortly on the heels of World War 2 one would expect to find a certain amount of racism towards the Japanese and yet (unlike slightly later films like Sayonara) it is almost devoid of any remarks of that kind.

Humphrey Bogart is a superb actor as always as is the rest of the cast. The plot is well written and the direction style suited well to the film. Over all I highly recommend that anyone who wants a sharp and fun movie check this one out just don't expect it to be the classic that "Treasure of the Sierra Madre" or that one of the many other "classic" films he made was. It is nonetheless worth watching and, to my mind at least, quite a bit better than the cookie cutter system they use for suspense films now.