I due topolini si recano nel selvaggio entroterra australiano per aiutare un ragazzo che cerca di salvare una splendida aquila da un cacciatore senza scrupoli.I due topolini si recano nel selvaggio entroterra australiano per aiutare un ragazzo che cerca di salvare una splendida aquila da un cacciatore senza scrupoli.I due topolini si recano nel selvaggio entroterra australiano per aiutare un ragazzo che cerca di salvare una splendida aquila da un cacciatore senza scrupoli.
- Premi
- 6 vittorie
Bob Newhart
- Bernard
- (voce)
Eva Gabor
- Miss Bianca
- (voce)
John Candy
- Wilbur
- (voce)
Tristan Rogers
- Jake
- (voce)
George C. Scott
- McLeach
- (voce)
Wayne Robson
- Frank
- (voce)
Douglas Seale
- Krebbs
- (voce)
Frank Welker
- Joanna
- (voce)
Bernard Fox
- Chairman
- (voce)
- …
Peter Firth
- Red
- (voce)
Billy Barty
- Baitmouse
- (voce)
Ed Gilbert
- Francois
- (voce)
Carla Meyer
- Faloo
- (voce)
- …
Russi Taylor
- Nurse Mouse
- (voce)
Linda Gary
- Mother Koala
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Trama
Lo sapevi?
- QuizThe producers wanted to have all the voice actors from Le avventure di Bianca e Bernie (1977) reprise their roles for the sequel. However, in the original, Orville the albatross was voiced by Jim Jordan, who died two years before this film was released. The producers didn't want to replace Jordan, so Orville was replaced with the character's brother Wilbur, voiced by John Candy. This is a reference to Orville Wright and Wilbur Wright, the inventors and pilots of the first functional airplane.
- BlooperWhen the French bug, Francois, first greets Bianca at the fancy restaurant, he calls her "Mademoiselle Bianca." After they finish their conversation, he says, "Allow me, Madame." In French, "Mademoiselle" is used for a single woman, and "Madame" for a married or widowed woman (or for very formal address). A native French speaker, as Francois is meant to be, would never use them interchangeably.
- Curiosità sui creditiThis movie doesn't end with the Walt Disney Pictures logo, only the credits "This motion picture was created by Walt Disney Pictures" and "Distributed by Buena Vista Pictures Distribution, Inc."
- Versioni alternativeIn the French version of the movie (which was made in 1991), the beautiful Anne Meson-Poliakoff's Pop song "Bernard Et Bianca Au Pays Des Kangourous" can be heard during the ending credits with Patrice Tison on lead guitar, Bernard Paganotti on bass, Jean-Jacques Milteau on harmonica, Alex Perdigon, Kako Bessot and Patrick Bourgoin on brass ensemble and Charly Doll on drums & percussions. However she and the other musicians appear to be uncredited.
- ConnessioniEdited into Zenimation: Flight (2020)
- Colonne sonoreMain Title
Composed by Bruce Broughton
Recensione in evidenza
I have always been one of the, maybe, eight or nine big fans of this movie and I have only one small question about it.
WHY CAN'T THEY MAKE MORE LIKE THIS???
If you have not seen this movie yet, you must. It's the first Disney movie to use fully rendered CGI backgrounds throughout and you definately get the sense that the animators wanted to play with this new method. What I'm getting at is that some of you may want to down some motion sickness medicine first.
There are *no* song and dance numbers. Reason being that this is a surprisingly dark, more emotionally complex story for a Disney movie. They went out on a limb and chose not to break the tone up too much.
This is the number two Lost Disney Movie (number one, without a doubt, is "the Hunchback of Notre Dame", which I also love). It's own creators barely acknowledge its existance. The very best evidence of this is on the new video release box's plot summary, where a MAJOR character's gender is misidentified.
On the other hand, I sort of enjoy the idea of a "cult" Disney movie. Instead of marketing "Down Under" to death, Disney can only be accused of the opposite mistake.
So, anyway, here I go again running to this movie's defence. I'll tackle the one major critisism of it before I go. Many critics were expecting another "Rescuers". In my humble opinion, these two movies are two entirely different animals. The original "Rescuers" is an example of where Disney was in the sixties and seventies. "Down Under" is a time capsule of late eighties, early nineties Disney. In other words, you can't really say that one is better than the other as the only thing they have in common are three characters (what I'm getting at is that this should be thought of more as "Rescue Aid Society: the Next Generation").
By the way, I've got an idea that I'm just going to throw out to the proverbial wolves here. Why not make more "Rescuers" movies instead of sequels to Disney movies where follow-up stories make no sence? They are sitting on one heck of a potential franchise here. Just thought I'd let you know.
WHY CAN'T THEY MAKE MORE LIKE THIS???
If you have not seen this movie yet, you must. It's the first Disney movie to use fully rendered CGI backgrounds throughout and you definately get the sense that the animators wanted to play with this new method. What I'm getting at is that some of you may want to down some motion sickness medicine first.
There are *no* song and dance numbers. Reason being that this is a surprisingly dark, more emotionally complex story for a Disney movie. They went out on a limb and chose not to break the tone up too much.
This is the number two Lost Disney Movie (number one, without a doubt, is "the Hunchback of Notre Dame", which I also love). It's own creators barely acknowledge its existance. The very best evidence of this is on the new video release box's plot summary, where a MAJOR character's gender is misidentified.
On the other hand, I sort of enjoy the idea of a "cult" Disney movie. Instead of marketing "Down Under" to death, Disney can only be accused of the opposite mistake.
So, anyway, here I go again running to this movie's defence. I'll tackle the one major critisism of it before I go. Many critics were expecting another "Rescuers". In my humble opinion, these two movies are two entirely different animals. The original "Rescuers" is an example of where Disney was in the sixties and seventies. "Down Under" is a time capsule of late eighties, early nineties Disney. In other words, you can't really say that one is better than the other as the only thing they have in common are three characters (what I'm getting at is that this should be thought of more as "Rescue Aid Society: the Next Generation").
By the way, I've got an idea that I'm just going to throw out to the proverbial wolves here. Why not make more "Rescuers" movies instead of sequels to Disney movies where follow-up stories make no sence? They are sitting on one heck of a potential franchise here. Just thought I'd let you know.
- La Gremlin
- 2 nov 2000
- Permalink
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paesi di origine
- Sito ufficiale
- Lingua
- Celebre anche come
- The Rescuers Down Under
- Aziende produttrici
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
Botteghino
- Budget
- 30.000.000 USD (previsto)
- Lordo Stati Uniti e Canada
- 27.931.461 USD
- Fine settimana di apertura Stati Uniti e Canada
- 3.499.819 USD
- 18 nov 1990
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 27.931.461 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione1 ora 17 minuti
- Colore
- Mix di suoni
- Proporzioni
- 1.85 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti
Divario superiore
What is the Brazilian Portuguese language plot outline for Bianca e Bernie nella terra dei canguri (1990)?
Rispondi