Quando re Giorgio III impazzisce, i suoi luogotenenti cercano di modificare le regole per governare il paese senza il suo coinvolgimento.Quando re Giorgio III impazzisce, i suoi luogotenenti cercano di modificare le regole per governare il paese senza il suo coinvolgimento.Quando re Giorgio III impazzisce, i suoi luogotenenti cercano di modificare le regole per governare il paese senza il suo coinvolgimento.
- Vincitore di 1 Oscar
- 16 vittorie e 19 candidature totali
Trama
Lo sapevi?
- QuizMany historians believe that George III's mental state was caused by porphyria, a metabolic imbalance that can cause blue urine. However, recent research into his written correspondence suggests bouts of mania, and a common type of medicine at the time could have caused blue urine, leading some to conclude that he had a psychiatric illness.
- BlooperIn the film, all the daughters of George III and Charlotte are portrayed as young children. However, in 1788 the daughters were ages 22, 20, 18, 12, 11, and 5.
- Citazioni
[Pitt has given the King some papers to sign]
George III: What is this? America, I suppose.
Pitt: No, sir.
George III: Oh, America's not to be spoken of, is that it?
Pitt: For your peace of mind, sir. But it's not America.
George III: Peace of mind! I have no peace of mind. I've had no peace of mind since we lost America. Forests, old as the world itself... meadows... plains... strange delicate flowers... immense solitudes... and all nature new to art... all ours... Mine. Gone. A paradise... lost.
Most often I watch a movie for the whole experience, taking in the plot, characters, acting, scenes and scenery, location, action, intrigue, comedy, tragedy, as a blend of the whole product. All of these weigh in and affect how much I enjoy the film. But half way through this film, I became aware that I was more engrossed in the lead character himself, and the great diversity and excellence of acting on display.
Others have commented that Hawthorne should have won the Best Actor Academy Award for his role in 1994. While I like Tom Hanks as an actor, I agree that his role in Forrest Gump wasn't anything exceptional. Certainly not on the order of "Mr. King" in "The Madness of King George." Indeed, Hawthorne must have had to work on his role -- even as a consummate actor, if not for the variations of mood and portrayals, at least for the vast amount of lines he had to speak in the film. By comparison, the Forrest Gump role had a very small amount of lines, and those were far less taxing to an actor. Hanks' was a role that seemed more fun and easygoing than a challenge or demand.
I'm not one to complain about Hollywood (except for the low quality and volume of attempts at humor in the past 20 years), but once in a while I think that many others who make the same observation are right on. Hollywood flops big time in its Oscar choice of an actor, actress or film once in a while. It seems to me that the California-based Academy at times doesn't look as objectively and honestly at films produced outside the U.S. Nothing else produced in 1994 even came close to the outstanding acting by Hawthorne in this first rate film.
I più visti
Everything New on Prime Video in February
Everything New on Prime Video in February
- How long is The Madness of King George?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paesi di origine
- Lingua
- Celebre anche come
- The Madness of King George
- Luoghi delle riprese
- Arundel Castle, Arundel, West Sussex, Inghilterra, Regno Unito(Windsor Castle: exterior)
- Aziende produttrici
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
Botteghino
- Budget
- 65.897.768 USD (previsto)
- Lordo Stati Uniti e Canada
- 15.238.689 USD
- Fine settimana di apertura Stati Uniti e Canada
- 65.226 USD
- 2 gen 1995
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 15.238.689 USD